TwiztedHeat
Registered User
- Feb 6, 2010
- 4,786
- 324
Shot in the dark: predicting Pat Wiercioch to MIN today
I...I really like this! Sign me up for wanting this to happen.
Shot in the dark: predicting Pat Wiercioch to MIN today
I...I really like this! Sign me up for wanting this to happen.
It would probably take a 2nd or two 3rds or something, if not more.
James Sheppard netted a 4th round pick for San Jose. This year they are pretty close, so that's probably the return for Brodziak.
What is Leopold's real value? 5th/6th rounder? I don't really like the notion of MN always "bringing everyone home" but if the cost is that low, maybe it doesn't make sense for us to bring in any other Dman
What is Leopold's real value? 5th/6th rounder? I don't really like the notion of MN always "bringing everyone home" but if the cost is that low, maybe it doesn't make sense for us to bring in any other Dman
Anyone else see this from Eklund?
Wild in on a “big name."
Just can't take this guy serious...
Maybe he means in the amount of letters used to spell the name?Anyone else see this from Eklund?
Wild in on a “big name."
Just can't take this guy serious...
Now I don't want a big name just so he's wrong again.
isn't he always or usually wrong anyways. Also do you have a link to where he said were in on a big name.
Thanks I also found this too
http://www.hockeybuzz.com/boards/thread.php?thread_id=124583&page=1
one of the posts on that forum said Unconfirmed from one of my sources, but it could also be Bozak, JVR, Gryba, or Wiercoch.
but again it's a hockeybuzz forum so not sure if I put any meat on what's being thrown out there.
The last "big" deal that I remember Eklund actually being right on was the Mike Richards deal to LA a few years ago. That tweet about a "big" name just feels like click bait.
The last "big" deal that I remember Eklund actually being right on was the Mike Richards deal to LA a few years ago. That tweet about a "big" name just feels like click bait.