SelltheTeamFrancesco
Registered User
- Aug 11, 2015
- 4,513
- 4,809
Trade Deadline Thread | Current Status: Medium Chaos
- Thread starter Vector
- Start date
- Status
I know he is but the complaining about what the market returned is crap too right?
The thing is that Calgary got burned that off season with Johnny hockey and Tkachuk and they don't want to get burned again, if better actual offers were out there Calgary would have taken one of them right?
We bought early and it looks like this year the bargains are coming in late.
He was going to get a first for Hanifin but why allow it to potentially get pushed out to 2026 draft? I get the 2024 draft is t viewed as a great draft but should have just kept the 2025 as is and not risk pushing that back.
Oilers top 6: McDrai, Nuge, Hyman, Henrique, Kane
Colorado top 6: Mack, Rantanen, Lek, Nichushkin, Mittlestadt, Drouin
Vegas top 6: Eichel, stone, Marchessault, Karlsson, Barbashev, Mantha
Dallas top 6: Hintz, Robertson, Pavelski, Benn, Johnston, Duchene, Marchement/Stankoven
Vancouver top 6: Pettersson, Miller, Boeser, Hoglander, Suter, Mikheyev……….
3 bottom 6 players in our top 6.
Colorado top 6: Mack, Rantanen, Lek, Nichushkin, Mittlestadt, Drouin
Vegas top 6: Eichel, stone, Marchessault, Karlsson, Barbashev, Mantha
Dallas top 6: Hintz, Robertson, Pavelski, Benn, Johnston, Duchene, Marchement/Stankoven
Vancouver top 6: Pettersson, Miller, Boeser, Hoglander, Suter, Mikheyev……….
3 bottom 6 players in our top 6.
It's the next available year and if Calgary gets the 26 one chances are it's a higher pick as Vegas is 2 years older right?
The markets decides the market not HF Board trade scenarios, Hanifin had a small list and Calgary had to sell and it looks like a bargain bin day for the most part today.
I just don't understand the outrage Calgary didn't leave a better offer on the table out there right?
It is odd but obviously Vegas might use it somewhere else so they asked for and got it.
Peter Griffin
Registered User
My issue is with Calgary giving Vegas the option to decide, Calgary should be the one calling the shots here.
Why did Hanifin have a small list? He only held an 8 team no trade clause.
Raistlin
Registered User
- Aug 25, 2006
- 5,015
- 3,955
I don't believe this is the year to go all in. This year is to sign EP and get exp. See how Dallas has Johnson and Stank compliment their top 6, that could be Willander and Lekk and even a more mature Pod in 2 years. Now with EP signed, there is no gun pointing to our head to "win now or else".
The window is the next few years.
Calgary obviously didn't mind so thus my question why is everyone so upset?
Because it's not like the other 24 teams were all in on trading for him in reality?
Obvious non playoff teams wouldn't be trading for a rental, nor would teams needing a center be looking for a Dman if they felt comfortable with their back end.
The 8 team list this late really means that in practice only a handful of teams were in a realistic position to be in on Hanifin.
Reverend Mayhem
Tell me all your thoughts on God
It’s an absolutely terrible return for a player of his caliber, full stop.
sting101
Registered User
- Feb 8, 2012
- 16,781
- 16,095
uhh Lindholm and Garland ???
Rick Rocket
Regetstred User
- May 22, 2008
- 1,537
- 530
TruGr1t
Proper Villain
- Jun 26, 2003
- 24,742
- 9,412
It would be more accurate to have Lindholm on that list than Mikheyev given TOI/GP, but the real problem is you have Mikheyev, Garland and Lindholm jointly making basically $15M AAV and playing like third-liners. Add Boeser, who has largely been salary-inefficient after the first ~30 games, and you have a top-six problem. Hoglander has been a net positive given his salary and production in average minutes played.
Mr. Canucklehead
Kitimat Canuck
Podkolzin wasn’t reassigned to play in tonight’s game, by the look of it.
DimitriL07
Registered User
VanillaCoke
Registered User
- Oct 30, 2013
- 26,235
- 12,927
Best guess pod, raty, silovs, 1st, cond. 3rd, mik for Jake and Chad. (Maybe jake @50% and Lars)
Breakers
Make Mirrored Visors Legal Again
Toffoli is interesting
The way he was handled was peak Jim Benning
Plays well in the playoffs, has good chemistry with Pettersson, most people assume we re-sign him. considering what we gave up for him.
Benning Proceeds to NEVER even make a contract offer to Toffoli, and he signs a relatively cheap deal, that is EASILY manageable.
Benning turns around signs Virtanen, let’s stecher walk, trades for Schmidt, let’s Tanev walk, and signs a substantially worse player in Tanner pearson 4 months later for absolutely no frigan reason
The way he was handled was peak Jim Benning
Plays well in the playoffs, has good chemistry with Pettersson, most people assume we re-sign him. considering what we gave up for him.
Benning Proceeds to NEVER even make a contract offer to Toffoli, and he signs a relatively cheap deal, that is EASILY manageable.
Benning turns around signs Virtanen, let’s stecher walk, trades for Schmidt, let’s Tanev walk, and signs a substantially worse player in Tanner pearson 4 months later for absolutely no frigan reason
Last edited:
I'm ok trading Podkolzin, I think in terms of value it's as high as it's going to get. I think the Canucks gave up hope that he becomes a top 6 forward (what he was originally drafted for).
So bye bye Podkolzin. Make sense if Silov is part of the package as I think the Canucks are moving forward with that Topiloko dude.
So bye bye Podkolzin. Make sense if Silov is part of the package as I think the Canucks are moving forward with that Topiloko dude.
- Status
