If Cousins is playing poorly, he would deserve to be scratched. That does no harm to the locker room. And this is coming from a guy who has preached about the importance of building a strong culture here for several seasons and how that was holding us back. You can always use mor scoring depth. Having stability and team chemistry doesn't mean you give your starters a pass for poor play. That's all I'm advocating. He's depth. We will need it for the playoffs.Check my tone ? Stop trying to teach me, when you obviously can't.
I'm not gonna bring every article about Pacioretty, it is well documented. Google is your friend. I already gave you a clue, that you could find some facts and opinions in Pierre Gervais' bio.
If putting Pacioretty on the 4th and scratching Cousins does no harm for you, or to this team locker-room like you think, well... Don't think I have the time to explain it to you. lool
Not questioning his production career-wise... Just saying he's at the end of it, and we obviously don't need him anymore, after finding a way better player and more proven performer...
Speak to me about the potential defensemen... Just if you continue with that non-sense, you're gonna be really disappointed... Billy is banking on stability and team-chemistry, putting Cousins/Lomberg in the pressbox won't do anything good for that.
That's the reason why Pacioretty is a no-no. 100%.
He will probably be a good addition to a contender for a low-price, like you said.
I'm not advocating blowing our load. I'm saying if Patches only costs a 3rd or 4th, do it.We’re in the place we are at today because of the guys who have performed this season. You need assets to win and be successful for years and we don’t need to blow our entire load on rentals for this one year. We got Tarasenko for a bag of pucks which fills the one need I think our team was looking for. And we only lost Lockwood out of it to waivers.
I’m not very interested in moving roster players or valuable assets for a rental, especially one who doesn’t fill a need and frankly doesn’t seem like a good fit.
I like that Gadjo got a two year deal too. He's great on the 4th line, can fight and play
Patches would get games with us down the stretch. It would also allow us to rest starters. He wouldn't be unfamiliar with our systems. He's 35, he's not dead. Yes, I think a professional with his pedigree could handle that.Sure but do you really think a guy like Pacioretty at his age would be ready to suit up in Round 3 game 6 after sitting for a month? And fitting seamlessly into our style? Unlikely.
If one of our top guys got hurt I'd way rather rely on the guy right behind him stepping up than bringing in an old mercenary coming in cold and unfamiliar to our team.
Mods please delete this troll post.
We'll see what happens next couple daysYou know nothing, Jon Snow !![]()
We'll see what happens next couple days
Seamlessly, of course not, but neither would Lorentz or Samo. He pretty much came out cold this year in Was and played alright, which is what you'd expect from a guy you'd trade a 4/5th round pick for.Sure but do you really think a guy like Pacioretty at his age would be ready to suit up in Round 3 game 6 after sitting for a month? And fitting seamlessly into our style? Unlikely.
If one of our top guys got hurt I'd way rather rely on the guy right behind him stepping up than bringing in an old mercenary coming in cold and unfamiliar to our team.
Mods please delete this troll post.
Disagreeing with you isn't trolling, but crying for mods is absolute gold.
You'll have to excuse my incomprehension, I'm having a fever dream from Forsling's contract and can't think properly.It was just a joke...
Got to think Montour is the guy out. No way we can keep him and Reinhart I think.
Only way around it is if Tarasenko looks great and we choose to keep Montour over Reino...
Do you really think Montour will age better than Ekblad given their roles? or do you expect the extension for Ekblad to be that insaneZito trades Ekblad as soon as he get's Ek's NTC-list.
Do you really think Montour will age better than Ekblad given their roles? or do you expect the extension for Ekblad to be that insane
The thing that worries me with Ekblad is the term. If he wants 8 years, you know the last 3 will most likely be bad, and you worry about years 4-5 as well. It'd be great if he was willing to sign a shorter contract, but IDK why he'd do that unless he decides same as Forsling that he really wants to be here.Do you really think Montour will age better than Ekblad given their roles? or do you expect the extension for Ekblad to be that insane
Well, that’s a good point. I mean, everyone knows, or should know, that Zito and Maurice are just puppets of HF posters, who have obviously made all the best trade and lineup decisions to propel this team to victory!Pomo I apologize for all of my hate directed towards you last year. Now I will have to find a new target, oh where shall I look???? Oh, that’s right - STINKBLAD!!!!!!!!!!!!