Post-Game Talk: Trade Deadline Day: March 7, 2025: Montreal stands pat

  • Xenforo Cloud is doing server maintenance Thurdsay 13th at 9 AM GMT. Downtime is to be expected during the process. Server changes were implemented recently to cope with the traffic surge last week. This seems to be affecting the user login, so please anyone experiencing this, log out and clear the browser cache. We expect to have this issue solved once the maintenance is complete.
  • We are currently aware of "log in/security error" issues that are affecting some users. We apologize and ask for your patience as we try to get these issues fixed.
In response to fans being upset that Hughes did not land a 2C, says the objective was not to win a Cup this season but to be in the mix. And they are. He did try with several teams for several good players, very good prospects, high draft picks.
 
I understand why they didn't do anything...but for me, safe is death.
And now we gonna pick 16th and be down a couple 2nds...
but our 'XP' is up, so there is that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: HabsMD97
Not good enough to make the playoffs, too good to get a high draft pick... At least the players are happy, according to KH.
1629905410-jesusmdr.gif
 
To defend Hughes, the priority they set this year is for the Rockets to go deep in the playoffs and for the Habs to be in the mix.

Getting help for the Habs in a 2C in this sellers market would likely require trading prospects in the system wither hurting the Rocket or other future prospects.

Made sense to do nothing.

Im ok with this
It didn't .. The roster size is expanding and they needed depth to patch up for any potential injuries. The inactivity has good chances of backfiring.
 
To defend Hughes, the priority they set this year is for the Rockets to go deep in the playoffs and for the Habs to be in the mix.

Getting help for the Habs in a 2C in this sellers market would likely require trading prospects in the system wither hurting the Rocket or other future prospects.

Made sense to do nothing.

Im ok with this
I’m good as well. Any depth at all would’ve made sense though and the cost would’ve been minimal. I don’t get that.
 
The same commentators who made excuses for Hughes’ inaction and inability to participate in the market in year 2 of the rebuild are doing the same today. They’ll never be honest interlocutors because they genuinely believe Kent is always right. As such, as much as they post their analysis is essentially worthless.

People didn't want to rush into major deals at the trade deadline in years 2 and 3 of a rebuild. That isn't proof of commenting in bad faith as you suggest or believing Kent Hughes is always right.

You may disagree with it, but it's not like it's some ridiculous irrational notion.
 
  • Like
Reactions: electron58 and Andy
Since Hughes chose to keep all of his pending UFAs, I wonder how many of them will be returning.
 

Ad

Ad