jaric1862
Registered User
- Jan 14, 2014
- 4,282
- 2,031
Dubas said he wants a guy that fits in the lineup and "in the locker room". I think they go after a grizzled vet type. Foligno or Palmieri
Duly NotedI agree, Nylander is ridiculous. Horribly inconsistent. Not worth the cap space. I’d recommend a hockey trade.
Based on this I'm not sure why pending UFA Jaden Schwartz has not at least been mentioned, even if it's just to clarify his situation, as he's the best pending UFA outside of a playoff spot right now.The St. Louis Blues are not out of contention but we know from GM Doug Armstrong's history, that he's not worried about trading pending UFAs when his team underachieves. He traded Kevin Shattenkirk at the deadline in 2017 despite being in a playoff spot. He traded Paul Stastny to Winnipeg in 2018 despite being a point out, and word is, from talking to different teams around the league, that he's open to potentially moving some pending UFAs. The Blues have disappointed.
I cant imagine Manson has any value anymore, in fact at 4.1 million he's probably a cap dump.Insider Trading: The latest on Taylor Hall, Josh Manson, and Henrik Lundqvist - TSN.ca
LeBrun: Hall has struggled with only two goals on the season, although certainly with a team that has struggled around him as well.
One guy who has nine goals and 21 points on the season is Mike Hoffman, a pending UFA who could also be on the move. The St. Louis Blues are not out of contention but we know from GM Doug Armstrong's history, that he's not worried about trading pending UFAs when his team underachieves. He traded Kevin Shattenkirk at the deadline in 2017 despite being in a playoff spot. He traded Paul Stastny to Winnipeg in 2018 despite being a point out, and word is, from talking to different teams around the league, that he's open to potentially moving some pending UFAs. The Blues have disappointed. Hoffman would be one, perhaps Tyler Bozak is another.
Seravalli: From one team in St. Louis who has had a disappointing season to another in the Calgary Flames. And the sense is that all is quiet on the Flames' front at the moment. I think there are a couple teams that are wondering if they might be able to get ahead of the roster reconstructive surgery that seems so apparent in the summer, with guys like Sean Monahan and Johnny Gaudreau. And I think Flames GM Brad Treliving is open to doing just about anything at this point, but deals like that typically wait until the off-season.
In the meantime the Flames are taking calls and have received interest on pending UFA goalie David Rittich. It's been a little bit more quiet for a guy like centre Derek Ryan and some of the Flames’ other lower-priced pending UFAs. But at this point, all things point to probably a pretty quiet deadline in Calgary.
Right shot defenceman always seem to be in pretty high demand and there might be a pretty good one available for the right price?
LeBrun: It's going to have to be a high price. The Anaheim Ducks over the years have really not wanted to take calls on Josh Manson. They really like the guy, they still do. But he has a year and a half left on his deal and frankly, where the Ducks are in the standings and where they're going with the youth movement, they are listening.
They've had a few calls on Manson but teams are going to have to step up. We're talking top prospect and a first-round pick to get your hands on Manson, whose rugged game certainly is accentuated during the playoffs.
Teams that are believed to have shown interest over the last few weeks are Winnipeg and Carolina, but again, they're going to have to pay a price to get him out of Anaheim.
I cant imagine Manson has any value anymore, in fact at 4.1 million he's probably a cap dump.
Since his breakout year in 2017-2018 he's seen his usage steadily decrease, by the end of last season he lost his role on the second pair to Gundbranson and this year he's been firmly planted on the third pair.
3rd pair D, toughness, PK, offensive black hole - he's basically Bogosian but making 4.1 million for another year.
Firmly on the third pair was probably too strong, based on usage I'd call that the third pair (I don't know what's on the lineup card) but they do use the bottom 4 fairly evenly, but this 8s with their #1D out of the lineup.Isn't he playing with Drysdale on teh 2nd pairing?
He's not a great player but he'd serve a purpose. Hes good defensively and would be an upgrade at 3C. That being said, I dont think he, and any combination of Kerfoot, Mikheyev and Engvall would be some sort of shutdown line, but we'd be better defensively with Glendening then without.Why do people still want Glendening?
He's not a great player but he'd serve a purpose. Hes good defensively and would be an upgrade at 3C. That being said, I dont think he, and any combination of Kerfoot, Mikheyev and Engvall would be some sort of shutdown line, but we'd be better defensively with Glendening then without.
Why do you feel that way?He wouldn't be an upgrade on 4C, let alone 3C.
So if we do bring in a forward who comes out? Galchenyuk deserves a spot in the lineup even if we do bring someone in.
Any forward trade we make should be to make the HEM line possible. A player good enough to play the wing top 6 and take that responsibility away from Hyman.
XXX Matthews Marner <-- this line needs someone who can hustle and compliment M&M.
Gally Tavares Nylander <-- this line is working. It feels like the production of this line went up ever since Gally joined
Hyman Engvall Mikheyev <-- awesome line
vs
Hyman Matthews Marner <-- very good first line
Gally Tavares Nylander
XXX Engvall Mikheyev <-- without Hyman this line goes from HEM to meh.
Maybe Robertson could serve as that XXX addition to the first line.
I would have agreed with this assessment on Hyman before last season, but he's started to do some valuable things so well. He was always a relentless forechecker, but until last year he rarely won puck battles to be able to do anything useful with the puck and really just tied it up long enough for reinforcements to arrive, but he's started to take on multiple defenders and come away with pucks cleanly.I have never, and will never like Hyman on the top line.
he is relentless and a fierce forechecker, BUT, he also cannot make a pass with any speed, so Matthews gets into an open spot, and the pass doesnt come, he adjusts and gets into another shooting spot, and the pass doesnt come, then Hyman dribbles a shot wide or loses the puck and all the effort of getting open is wasted and chances lost.
this happens at least one of every 3 shifts... dont believe me, watch for it in the next game, and you'll see!
...and Hyman on the PP is just as bad or worse. he blocks shots from the point when in front of the net, and then cant find the puck, because his reaction time is too slow, and his passing ability is null.
Gally has a great one-timer (and shot) and Hyman is on the PP ahead of him... thats insanity.
I love him in his role, but his role shouldnt be as a primary goal scoring option (i.e. top line or any PP)
Why do you feel that way?
@zeke Cant get over the fact that Dubas mindset has changed. It's clear based off the off-season additions we made....Dubas's mindset has been to add more Grit and leadership both on the ice and off the ice for the leafs....compared to soft analytical players.
I told Zeke and others that Taylor Hall isn't a fit for us, even though they've been clamoring for him. And it looks as if the LEafs aren't interested in Hall according to the latest reports.
Any forward trade we make should be to make the HEM line possible. A player good enough to play the wing top 6 and take that responsibility away from Hyman.
XXX Matthews Marner <-- this line needs someone who can hustle and compliment M&M.
Gally Tavares Nylander <-- this line is working. It feels like the production of this line went up ever since Gally joined
Hyman Engvall Mikheyev <-- awesome line
vs
Hyman Matthews Marner <-- very good first line
Gally Tavares Nylander
XXX Engvall Mikheyev <-- without Hyman this line goes from HEM to meh.
Maybe Robertson could serve as that XXX addition to the first line.