The Podium
Registered User
He's shown his value with Ottawa as well. Always been a solid player.
The same Nick Paul was was demoted to the AHL 12 times and waived 3 times only 2 years ago?
He's shown his value with Ottawa as well. Always been a solid player.
JT and Matty had a blank cheque. Marner and Willie dragged out their negotiations and came across as greedy. As Bieksa said, take a little less and you'll get less heat. Sound advice IMO.
Im pretty sure Bieska said similar. IIRC His wife wanted him to take just a bit less because a “fair deal” comes with less criticism and stress… to some degree.I remember Kaberle specifically took a bit less so if he had off-games-stretches etc, less heat, it was true.
JVR also didn't get a lot of heat here because we all thought he was adequately compensated.
Unless you're flat out done...you take less, you're not bugged much. Simmonds didn't get that much heat this year but I don't think anyone is putting him in their line up for next season.
And people have lauded them. It's swings and roundabouts. With Tavares he got overpaid because he's a UFA. You don't worry about years 5 onwards. With Paul, we don't like the term, and might be overpaid. Both sides are probably playing off each other.I wouldn't give that contract to Paul. It's not terrible, but people on here have heavily criticized much better moves than that made by the Leafs.
And people have lauded them. It's swings and roundabouts. With Tavares he got overpaid because he's a UFA. You don't worry about years 5 onwards. With Paul, we don't like the term, and might be overpaid. Both sides are probably playing off each other.
He was better than marner for the first 20 games though.Marner gets the most hate on the team fir his contract which he deserved upn until this year
People send marner/his family threats when he's playing poorly. Some Nylander fans started saying Nylander was better than marner in the first 20 games of the year where marner started slow. He gets a lot of hate
Only JT gets away easy for his overpaid deal
7 YEARS?!?!?!
Jeez, all these free agency contract critics in here, where were you after Dubas dropped $3.8 x 3 for a backup goalie last off-season?![]()
A lot of people criticized that contract… the overwhelming majority actually
Ok maybe not overwhelming majority, but definitely mixed reviews. Not many seemed to think it was a good deal, rather it ranged from ok to bad.
He was tagged at around that aav but for 3-5 seasons, not 7. Good for him for turning a couple of timely goals into 3 extra years of term and maybe a couple hundred grand in aavReally good move by Tampa there. Keeps the AAV nice and low and can move him at any point. I'm jealous.
These are more than half of the responses on page 1:Only after he got injured multiple times and shit the bed this season...
At the time of the signing, it was overwhelmingly lauded by posters as that thread shows.
That's why I don't put too much stock into people criticizing other teams' UFA signings, when Dubas signings like that one get overwhelming praise.
Nice, it the money is good
Edit - I am not terribly happy about the dollars
Hopefully not too expensive.
Edit: 3.8 is a bit higher than I expected.
Not bad
3.8 is a little on the higher side, but still manageable. Mrazek is probably better or cheaper than most goalies on the market, so definitely not a bad choice
3.8M cap hit seems ok. Definitely affordable and fair for Mrazek. Solid starter with a lot of experience.
I was hoping 3.5 so 3.8 is not too bad.
3.8 seems a bit expensive to me. Thought it would be more like 3.2
I’m okay with 3.8, I was scared we were going to be getting into the 4.5 million dollar range.
I’m ok with mrazek. Just not sure why we didn’t try to get one of the cheaper ones
be interesting to see what others go foe
3.8 is alright
He will be the 1A and Campbell the 1B
I still think it's a decent deal. I can't judge him based on just this past year.These are more than half of the responses on page 1:
None of that screams overwhelming lauded… I’m not going through every page in that thread, but like I said the majority seems to think it was ok-to-bad at the time the deal was signed. Not many lauding it as some great deal.
7 years is a long time, but they're a cup contender now. The thing I don't understand is the Hagel and Paul moves are both win now moves, but trading away McDonagh isn't. Pulling the team in different directions is how you end up like us.
I still think it's a decent deal. I can't judge him based on just this past year.
Sure let’s just dial up one of the 6-7 teams that has one of “those” guys and let’s trade for him.We should get a good goalie then.
7 years is a long time, but they're a cup contender now. The thing I don't understand is the Hagel and Paul moves are both win now moves, but trading away McDonagh isn't. Pulling the team in different directions is how you end up like us.
McDonagh noticeably couldn't keep up in that final and will slow down even more over the next few years. Tampa probably feel being proactive here with a trade is the best option especially with Sergachev in the wings. 6.5m for the next 4 years is a steep cap hit.
Bitching about any and everything today?We should at least wait until October until we start criticizing other teams moves.
Jeez, all these free agency contract critics in here, where were you after Dubas dropped $3.8 x 3 for a backup goalie last off-season?![]()