TheSauceBoss
Registered User
- May 14, 2010
- 742
- 52
If you are going to replace him with a younger, almost a PPG winger that is showing chemistry with your best player along with upgrading your center situation, why not? I get that Zucc is good and good with Kap but eventually he is going to be moved, why not do it with his value high right now and allow us to retain a quality C if we do indeed trade for miller? Would you rather have the top six i created or trade fiala and figure out a new secondary scoring line?At this point I think trading Zuccarello is one of those hypotheticals that just doesn't go anywhere, at least not in the next year or so. They're not going to trade away a PPG winger that's got preternatural chemistry with the team's best player.
Mostly because I'm not convinced that you can swap Zuccarello for Miller and still keep Fiala, but a lot of that comes down to Fiala's contract demands. If those end up being lower than I expect (i.e. less than $7m AAV) then I'm not against seeing if we can figure something out.If you are going to replace him with a younger, almost a PPG winger that is showing chemistry with your best player along with upgrading your center situation, why not? I get that Zucc is good and good with Kap but eventually he is going to be moved, why not do it with his value high right now and allow us to retain a quality C if we do indeed trade for miller? Would you rather have the top six i created or trade fiala and figure out a new secondary scoring line?
Will probably work, but that exact roster is about 800k over the cap assuming a flat cap. On an aside, Val Nichuskin would be an awesome FA, especially if we lose greenway.
Isn't the assumption at the moment that we're going to see $1M bumps? I thought that was the last I heard.
I wonder what he would do if offered 8/6.5. That's life changing money, there.Fair enough, though I think this option dries up quickly when Fiala balks at $6.5m.
I wonder what he would do if offered 8/6.5. That's life changing money, there.
Currently we can guess he is at 7 mill x6. just for fun. acquire miller for 22 1st + a prospect they really like. RD is apparently a need but maybe they want a forward who knows. Miller after next year would be the interesting tipping point. what would his raise be? this will have to become a year by year roster flip until the dead cap is gone so who knows.Mostly because I'm not convinced that you can swap Zuccarello for Miller and still keep Fiala, but a lot of that comes down to Fiala's contract demands. If those end up being lower than I expect (i.e. less than $7m AAV) then I'm not against seeing if we can figure something out.
More realistically I just don't think they'll trade away Zuccarello after the year he's had with Kaprizov, though. Next summer's a different question.
Regardless, the upshot of all of this is that these are decisions that can be made in June, even if they add at the deadline.
Don’t think that’s happening anymoreIsn't the assumption at the moment that we're going to see $1M bumps? I thought that was the last I heard.
Don’t think that’s happening anymore
Almost as many goals as Hartman.
They think they're going to get the Eichel return for himGreat. Canuck fans will think they can get a 4th 1st rounder for him now.
Yeah, Talbot started poorly, then did well, and then did poorly again. Just been inconsistent. I will say in his favor, though, even when he has been having poor stretches of games he seems to come up with a huge save here or there that he shouldn't, and it's been helping the team win thanks to all the scoring help he gets. That one big save has been the difference between a win and a loss several times this year.We should probably address the fact that Talbot is at 8 Goals against above expected this year. He has not been good. I've thought Kahk has looked pretty good, though.
We should probably address the fact that Talbot is at 8 Goals against above expected this year. He has not been good. I've thought Kahk has looked pretty good, though.
He 100% should be traded this off-season and Kahk should be our starter.
Absolutely not, unless we get a 1st + for him. He is only paid 3M, which is peanuts for starter...there is nothing down in Iowa, not even a solid backup, IMO. Maybe next year at the TDL if someone develops, but I am not holding my breath. Jones, Baribeau, Kowzlewski, MacIntyre, are all average AHL'ers (at best) at this point. Hammond might be an OK emergency backup.He 100% should be traded this off-season and Kahk should be our starter.
Absolutely not, unless we get a 1st + for him. He is only paid 3M, which is peanuts for starter...there is nothing down in Iowa, not even a solid backup, IMO. Maybe next year at the TDL if someone develops, but I am not holding my breath. Jones, Baribeau, Kowzlewski, MacIntyre, are all average AHL'ers (at best) at this point. Hammond might be an OK emergency backup.
Two years from now I would love to be seeing KK as the starter, Wallstedt as the backup.
That's what it comes down to really. One or the other.( or zucc).Maybe I’m silly, but I really think we can make keeping Fiala work. We’d have to move Dumba, and I would consider moving Talbot as well, but it works with the cap
Given how Addison’s looked this year, that one makes the most sense to me. I would move Talbot and try and find a 1A/1B guy to run with Kahk. It’s be one thing if Talbot was playing at an average NHL starter level, but he’s been very meh this year and letting in more than he should. Probably going to need to allocate the same amount to the goaltending position still, though.That's what it comes down to really. One or the other.( or zucc).
One of the 6m salaries will need to be jettisoned. Just a matter of which one.
Absolutely not, unless we get a 1st + for him. He is only paid 3M, which is peanuts for starter...there is nothing down in Iowa, not even a solid backup, IMO. Maybe next year at the TDL if someone develops, but I am not holding my breath. Jones, Baribeau, Kowzlewski, MacIntyre, are all average AHL'ers (at best) at this point. Hammond might be an OK emergency backup.
Two years from now I would love to be seeing KK as the starter, Wallstedt as the backup.
That's what it comes down to really. One or the other.( or zucc).
One of the 6m salaries will need to be jettisoned. Just a matter of which one.