Spurgeon
Registered User
Unlikely, considering the return for Hagel (RFA vs UFA but Hartman’s better imo).If a team came calling about Hartman and offered a 1st+2nd for him, would you pull the trigger on that trade?
Hartman at $1.7M for 2 more years is such a steal of a contract & I think he’ll benefit this team a lot more in just the next two years than the potential future benefit a 1st + 2nd could bring 4-5 years from now.
Not only that, but the fact that he signed a team friendly deal to have stability makes me extremely hesitant to ever consider moving him. You keep him and hope he feels the same way when he’s due for an extension.
Russo just has to get back into the mindset of this team trading away all of their 2nds and 3rds for deadline rentals that don’t work out.It's also extremely normal to have three picks in the top 100, as that is what is given to each team by default. It always bugs me when he points to that as some boon that we have.