Proposal: TORONTO - NASHVILLE

Bloomberg

Registered User
Jun 20, 2014
1,903
497
That looks like a lot of pieces going to Toronto for a sub par package…I get Robertson has untapped potential and needs a chance to show what he’s got but why would NSH want Liljegren?

NSH needs more RHD, so Liljegren would fit into that? Liljegren was playing pretty well before an injury last year, so hopefully he will see good improvements this year. Toronto needs RHD also, but current it's probably OEL and Liljegren on a pair, which might not work out if we play the Floridas, Bostons in the playoffs, OEL - Schenn might work better.
 

Bringer of Jollity

Registered User
Oct 20, 2011
13,404
8,638
Fontana, CA
Yeah umm no. Robertson might not be bad, but don't want any of the other mess in that. If Liljegren was " playing pretty well " you wouldn't be looking to replace him.

Molendyck is definitely not on the table, not for any of those players anyways.
From our POV I'm taking Tomasino, Molendyk, and Schenn over their analogue pieces coming back, without even getting into the two extras we're sending (I guess Glass is also a cap dump here?). Silly trade.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PredsV82 and Viqsi

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad