When you apply your theory of late 1st rounder in the 20's and not much difference between #34, and 2nd and 3rd rounders to the results of previous actual draft, it sure looks like there is a significant diffference.
You mean when you take a sample size of one, and using hindsight, compare a success story in the late 1st (in one of the strongest drafts in history) to a less successful 2nd/3rd rounder, the 1st rounder is better? Wow, what a surprise!
Using that logic, Cirelli was drafted in the 3rd round, and Cirelli > Konecny, so 3rd rounder > 1st rounder confirmed, right?
Heck, Samsonsov was taken 2 spots ahead of Konecny, so you must be thrilled about our goaltending this upcoming season, right?
Additionally, the deal would have included Ottawa retaining salary and Buffalo flipping the 16th pick of the first round for 7th overall, according to Darren Dreger of TSN.
As I said, there were reports about what the trade
included, but you do not know what the entirety of the deal was.
If Dubas chose to trade back knowing he could get Minten (implying nobody had him as a 1st rounder) to dump Mrazek and then with the new cap space decided Murray for a 3rd and 7th is better them potentially moving up to #7 like Buffalo. Then this all looks worse then it is, based on the fact that professional scouting agencies see Minten as a reach at #38.
As I already noted, just because Ottawa is willing to trade back to 16 for Murray, it doesn't mean they're willing to trade back to 25 or 38. Unlike 25 -> 38, moving 25/38 -> 7 would have meant moving to different prospect quality tiers, and there's really no reason to spend assets to move up there, especially in a weak draft where there's no notable target. Murray has nothing to do with Minten, and ending up with Minten at #38 doesn't look bad at all.