LeafChief
Matthew Knies Enthusiast
That would be ideal. He sounds like prospect in the same ilk as Grundstrom.I've read comparisons to a better skating Hornqvist. That sounds awesome.
That would be ideal. He sounds like prospect in the same ilk as Grundstrom.I've read comparisons to a better skating Hornqvist. That sounds awesome.
...... summary?Anyone hear Burke on the radio earlier?
Damn he roasted Kapanen.
actually i think that does fit the capI mean, that looks great, but you're not making it happen under the salary cap.
...... summary?
Good trade. As another poster said, losing Kapanen does not move our team back one bit. You could easily replace him on that line with Engvall or Mikheyev internally, and it would look basically identical.
Let's see what Dubas does next. His trades have mostly been very good.
Have to agree...Kaps was a bit of a one trick pony. Speed to kill...and no chemistry with anyone.Basically called Kapanen soft, had terrible hands and that the Leafs wouldnt miss him one bit.
His quote was actually something like.
"Leafs wont miss him for 1 second, 1 minute or 1 game".
You'd think we were trading a total scrub. It honestly felt like Burke had some agenda against Kap considering how much he was trashing him.
because Caro does not have Sid/Letang/Malkin/Hornq careers winding downUsing the logic that Kapanen was better for Pittsburgh instead of the 15th overall pick, why wouldn't Don Waddell use that same type of thinking for Carolina and the 13th overall pick?
Does Burke know it's possible to criticize a player without calling them soft?Basically called Kapanen soft, had terrible hands and that the Leafs wouldnt miss him one bit.
His quote was actually something like.
"Leafs wont miss him for 1 second, 1 minute or 1 game".
You'd think we were trading a total scrub. It honestly felt like Burke had some agenda against Kap considering how much he was trashing him.
Isn't that a lot more than Johnsson and a 1st I suggested for the same return minus Rackell?That’s tempting, probably will ask Ducks to add the Boston 1St rounder and it is a very even deal on both sides.
As usual Leaf optimism shines bright on our unproven young guys.
No problem that Engvall,Mikheyev and Robertson can step in and replace players even though none have proven anything yet.
I have seen and heard it all before with big love for Brown,Soshnikov,Moore and the Swedes,Fins,Russians we signed and even with Kappy and Johnsson themselves.
I probably forgot others gone but for me I have long been in the I'll believe it when I see it camp and will always not get too excited about our shiny new toys.
Kappy may not have turned out as good as many hoped but he still proved he could score 20 and be a dangerous guy on the PK.
To me it is Manson for 15th overall.Isn't that a lot more than Johnsson and a 1st I suggested for the same return minus Rackell?
4. Pittsburgh wanted no part of himThe fact that it was Aberg and not Bracco was telling that Dubas either:
1. Is keeping Bracco
2. Thinks he can get something for him
3. Is already part of another deal
I've read comparisons to a better skating Hornqvist. That sounds awesome.
That's actually not a better of a return than what Kappy got. IMO it's nowhere near enough, and more importantly....there is no real point to doing so.To me it is Manson for 15th overall.
Rackell, Comotis and Boston 1st round pick for Willie. There is no doubt Willie is the better player but Rackell did put up 30 goals twice and I think he can produce 30goals again playing with either AM or JT.
Also, I am thinking and hoping TB can beat Boston, so the pick will be 23rd-25th instead of late 28th- 31st.
The more I think about the team, the more I lean towards keeping AJ. We have some unproven wingers, his value is likely the lowest of the ~$3M group and he's shown some chemistry with AM and Tavares. Gives them options and can play anywhere on the top 3 lines.Kerfoot
Engvall may go because the Leafs might want more of a physical element in the bottom 6.
Johnsson- The Leafs still like him a lot so they won't just give him away. It would have to be a precurser to a deal that lands them a defenceman.
May as well post this here
I will summarize what Mirtle and Lebrun said in their respective articles on the Athletic in own words.
Mirtle
Leafs got tired of Kapanen't act on ice and off ice. Other teams backed off when they did more research.
4 players are being dangled by the Leafs.
Andersen can be had for a useless low cost asset. Would be a cap clearing move.
Kerfoot
Engvall may go because the Leafs might want more of a physical element in the bottom 6.
Johnsson- The Leafs still like him a lot so they won't just give him away. It would have to be a precurser to a deal that lands them a defenceman.
There is no intention to trade Nylander, or at least right now.
Lebrun
Leafs spoke with teams like the Devils, Preds, Ducks, Wild, Blackhawks and Canes.
Leafs tried getting #13 back but no way that was happening. Same with the Ducks who weren't trading #6. Devils were willing to trade one of their lower 1sts, but they weren't trading a good prospect plus another piece as well on top.
Leafs asked for #17 from the Hawks but no interest.
Leafs probably asked for #11 from Preds, but that didn't happen.
Wild and Leafs engaged, but #9 pick was out of the question.
Oilers and Habs knew Kapanen was available, but again they weren't going to trade their 1sts for him.
Leafs and Andersen's group haven't talked. There was no mention of Matt Murray in the dialogue between Leafs and Pens.
The objective here is to replace 15 goals, not 40 goals.
Expecting one of Robertson/Mikheyev to do that is more than reasonable, considering Mikheyev was on a 15 goal pace this season anyway.
This is quite the overreaction.
The more I think about the team, the more I lean towards keeping AJ. We have some unproven wingers, his value is likely the lowest of the ~$3M group and he's shown some chemistry with AM and Tavares. Gives them options and can play anywhere on the top 3 lines.
What did they say about Kerfoot?
Surprised you found that return even worth replying to. I was thinking about it and said nahhhhThat's actually not a better of a return than what Kappy got. IMO it's nowhere near enough, and more importantly....there is no real point to doing so.
You think I am overreacting and I think you are being over optimistic.
On pace for stuff means nothing as tons of players looked good using that on pace junk and faded away.
Lets see him do it for 80 games and playoffs before we stamp him a solid regular.
Same goes for all the guys that have not played a whole season yet.
15 goals plus PK plus one of the key guys used late in games to protect a lead and a guy that at least had some sandpaper.
This can be replaced of course but these guys have to prove they can do it.
Great if they can but if not it means we got even worse and nothing in the minors left to fix it.
AJ should absolutely be next on the trade list.AJ is the exact type of player we should be avoiding. You have $40M in the top two lines. They have each other to create offense. What each of those lines need is someone who is nasty to play against and can crash the net. AJ is none of those things. Trade him now. Trade him fast. Trade him hard. Just trade him.