Confirmed Signing with Link: [TOR] F Auston Matthews signs extension with the Maple Leafs (4 years, $13.25M AAV)

Status
Not open for further replies.

TS Quint

Stop writing “I mean” in your posts.
Sep 8, 2012
8,604
6,152
What other star player has done this exactly?
It's mostly just Lesfs players at the top end of salaries that take the shorter term. It's a culture of selfishness in that organization.
 

Golden_Jet

Registered User
Sep 21, 2005
26,362
13,673
Those are all great players, I’m not even sure how I’d rank them all. But the issue here are people saying matthews is the worst super star in the league and This contract is too much money.

People are saying pasta is better than matthews, people are saying he’s ‘done nothing’ to earn about 15% of the cap. People are saying Matthews is not only a worse player than Mackinnon, but that Mackinnon is closer to Mcdavid than matthews is to Mackinnon.

So if a couple people have matthews ranked 2-3 spots higher than you do on the ‘best players in the league’ list, I’m willing to just split the difference and move on.

The other side of thise coin, the posters absolutely insulting and shitting on matthews, those are the ones who obviously need to be told that matthews has averaged 50+ goals per 82 games over the course of 7 seasons.
Using pace, just means your not available enough, but if it makes you feel better.
 

Strangle

Leafs Smol PP
May 4, 2009
9,757
6,997
I don't understand the shock at the term. It's been speculated for a long time from many insiders that the Matthews extension wouldn't be a long term one. That's a pretty high AAV for that short a term though. Not good news for Oilers/Draisaitl fans.

I think you’re going to see a lot of players and teams opting to go this way.

The wild swings of the cap are going to cause this. If the NHLPA and NHL could add into the CBA that players sign for a percentage of the cap, and not a hard dollar figure, then signing for longer wouldn’t be such a huge disadvantage to the player.

For all matthews knows, the cap could go up to $200m in 6 years. And then Johnny 4th liner is signing for $20m a year, like in the NBA
 

htpwn

Registered User
Nov 4, 2009
20,632
2,782
Toronto
Ovechkin proved it was just a down year. Matthews hasn’t proved that yet.

... which is why I asked "if this was 2017." The point being that even the greatest goal scorer of this generation, perhaps of all-time, had a down year or two.

Interesting question. If you, let's say, look at 2012-2017, Ovechkin was no doubt a top-end player. But he wouldn't be a unanimous "top 3" guy. Lots of people would have had Crosby, Kane, Malkin and maybe even Doughty above him.

And I think the league had less top-end talent then than it does now.

I don't have a problem with people arguing that Matthews is not top 3 or top 5 or whatever -- as you said, there is a lot of elite talent in the NHL right now who are in that discussion.

I would argue, though, that it is a bit of a pointless argument vis à vis his contract. He's absolutely part of that very small elite in the NHL (again, two Richards in the last three years) and a player with a track record like his was absolutely going to get a contract like this.
 

Strangle

Leafs Smol PP
May 4, 2009
9,757
6,997
Guess that’s only you then, since your the only person with that number.

I understand that when you’re not sure what to argue, you take obvious hyperbole and interpret it literally.

But my exaggeration isn’t even that outrageous. I read at least one poster saying matthews will sign for more than $13.25 on his next deal. Which is irrelevant anyways, because it all depends on what the cap is.

But no, there’s more than just that one poster who are implying, if not outright saying, that matthews next contract will be even more of the cap than this one.

And that’s 100% an embarrassing take, and obviously just trolls
 

CupofOil

Knob Flavored Coffey
Aug 20, 2009
48,679
45,637
NYC
I think you’re going to see a lot of players and teams opting to go this way.

The wild swings of the cap are going to cause this. If the NHLPA and NHL could add into the CBA that players sign for a percentage of the cap, and not a hard dollar figure, then signing for longer wouldn’t be such a huge disadvantage to the player.

For all matthews knows, the cap could go up to $200m in 6 years. And then Johnny 4th liner is signing for $20m a year, like in the NBA
I'm not so sure about that. Just about every other core player over the last few years have been signing 7-8 year contracts.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TS Quint

Golden_Jet

Registered User
Sep 21, 2005
26,362
13,673
I think you’re going to see a lot of players and teams opting to go this way.

The wild swings of the cap are going to cause this. If the NHLPA and NHL could add into the CBA that players sign for a percentage of the cap, and not a hard dollar figure, then signing for longer wouldn’t be such a huge disadvantage to the player.

For all matthews knows, the cap could go up to $200m in 6 years. And then Johnny 4th liner is signing for $20m a year, like in the NBA
That would be a terrible idea, for teams.
Most don’t have problems signing the guys they want to 7-8 years
 
Last edited:

Ezekial

Cheap Pizza, Okay Hockey
Sponsor
Nov 22, 2015
24,271
17,807
Chicago
Your anecdote rebuttal to that post is here are the three best players of the entire generation who also happened to age well?

Toews and Kane fell off. Kovalchuk fell off. Rick Nash fell off. The number of guys who didn't fall off in their mid 30s is short. Iginla fell off. Stamkos isn't as good as he used to be.

Ovy is basically the only goal scorer in history that hasn't fallen off.
Kane fell off during the deal? He had 45 points in 54 games for the Hawks this year before they traded him and he put up 93 points in 78 games last year. He had 680 points in 604 games during that deal. The Hawks fell off mainly because of all the other shit tier deals Bowman signed, like Seabrook. Not Kane's deal.
 

Dirty Dog

Wooftastic
Sponsor
Jul 11, 2013
12,159
14,918
The doghouse


Ask and you shall receive.


I mean, that was 18 years ago. And unless my memory is hurting, short contracts for star players was still a thing so that wasn’t that unusual

I’m obviously talking about a comparable in the modern landscape of the NHL. You pointing to a contract signed almost two decades ago isn’t the point you’re tryin to make!
 

Strangle

Leafs Smol PP
May 4, 2009
9,757
6,997
I'm not so sure about that. Just about every other core player over the last few years have been signing 7-8 year contracts.

It will turn out to be a huge disadvantage for players to do that now. Until the cap normalizes, of course.

But if you take 15% of this cap and in 4 years that number would increase by $3-$4m per year …. I mean agents aren’t stupid

15% might be around $12-$13m today, it could be over $15m Tomorrow
 

FlameChampion

Registered User
Jul 13, 2011
14,800
17,457
I think its a lame contract personally. Huge cap at a relatively short term. Least its 4 years I guess.

Gratz to the Leafs who like this deal. Least he’s staying in Canada.
 

Divine

Registered User
Dec 18, 2010
19,315
13,542
I mean, that was 18 years ago. And unless my memory is hurting, short contracts for star players was still a thing so that wasn’t that unusual

I’m obviously talking about a comparable in the modern landscape of the NHL. You pointing to a contract signed almost two decades ago isn’t the point you’re tryin to make!

Keep moving those goalposts. You asked and I answered. Now you're upset that there was an answer so it doesn't count. :laugh:
 

Ghost of Jody Hull

Registered User
May 20, 2022
915
1,463
I think you’re going to see a lot of players and teams opting to go this way.

The only player who's had, or who's even been rumoured to have, this outlook is Matthews.

Every other star, whether it's McDavid, MacKinnon, Makar, Pastrnak, etc., has opted for a 7 or 8-year deal.

More guys will have to do it before we can call it a trend.

Even in the NBA, it's not all that common. It's been a couple guys – Lebron and Durant. Most stars sign for max dollars and max years when they come up.
 

Strangle

Leafs Smol PP
May 4, 2009
9,757
6,997
The only player who's had, or who's even been rumoured to have, this outlook is Matthews.

Every other star, whether it's McDavid, MacKinnon, Makar, Pastrnak, etc., has opted for a 7 or 8-year deal.

More guys will have to do it before we can call it a trend.

It’s not a trend yet, for sure. But the way matthews is navigating the cap is blazing the trail.

If other players don’t follow suit, I’d be surprised

It can also be argued that these contracts are win/win for team and player. No more huge anchors at 36 years old and taking up more cap than their production would dictate
 

Voight

#winning
Feb 8, 2012
42,161
18,745
Mulberry Street
Matthews clearly fought injury issues most of the year . Was obvious from a viewing standpoint . I expect him to be way closer to the 50 /60 goal version than the guy that showed up last season . And that version is without a doubt a top 5 player .

He also had the 2nd lowest shooting % of his career. Much lower than the last 4 seasons.
 

Ghost of Jody Hull

Registered User
May 20, 2022
915
1,463
It’s not a trend yet, for sure. But the way matthews is navigating the cap is blazing the trail.

If other players don’t follow suit, I’d be surprised

Maybe. But I doubt it. Coming off his ELC, Matthews "blazed" the trail asking for 5 years instead of 8 to get to UFA as soon as possible.

Not many young stars did the same thing.

Even in the NBA it's not common. Most players take max dollars for max years.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad