Leafshater67
Registered User
Hey don’t blame me, I like this deal. It’ll depend on the contract thoTanev went from being an amazing playoff D on Dallas to being absolutely worthless in Toronto.
Gotta love the leaf haters!
Hey don’t blame me, I like this deal. It’ll depend on the contract thoTanev went from being an amazing playoff D on Dallas to being absolutely worthless in Toronto.
Gotta love the leaf haters!
I actually love the persecution complex from Leafs fans more. 34 year old rental being a great add for a division leading playoff team makes sense; soon to be 35 year old getting an 8 year (or just long term) contract… makes less sense. Really doesn’t have a whole lot to do with the teams unless you have a perpetual victim complex.
"Tax friendly markets" but, but, hfboards claims it isn't a factor.
Didn't this rule change couple of years ago, like some other poster already said? you can offer 8 year only to players that were on your roster during the latest TDL
from what I saw against Dallas this year, dude is done. I've seen a lot of Tanev over the years in Vancouver and Calgary...hes a shell of his former self.This would have been a great get for Toronto 5 years ago.
yeah btu players dont care and dont take less... so its useless.with toronto it isn't
they will give signing bonuses to everything they don't care
Yeah sure lol…..Right, sure thing
His body started breaking down in vancouver.IDK how many good years he has left but he is what we need
I guess, but I’d be wary of giving him that because I could see him falling off in a year or twoWhy not give a longterm deal? It drives down AAV and lets us get other important pieces
Tanev knows why Toronto is giving him 6-7 years, he'll enjoy his ride into the sunset with millions entering his account for nothing
next robidas island candidate coming right up
That's fair, but I think it depends on how low they can get this AAV. If they can get it to 2.5-3, essentially bottom pair money, he should likely still be at that level for a bit longer. The Leafs just want to take advantage of having an elite defensive defenseman at extremely cheap for a year or 2I guess, but I’d be wary of giving him that because I could see him falling off in a year or two
Maybe I’m just pessimistic but I think this will age badly in 1-2 years and we will be stuck with his 2-3 million for a few years before LTIR shenanigans
from what I saw against Dallas this year, dude is done. I've seen a lot of Tanev over the years in Vancouver and Calgary...hes a shell of his former self.