Proposal: Tor - Clb

Leaf19

Registered User
Dec 25, 2013
637
32
There's a lot of hyperbole in this thread, should be fun to look back at in a few years :laugh:

How about both teams stick with what we have and move on? No deal to be made here.
 

WTFMAN99

Registered User
Jun 17, 2009
34,203
12,337
Nylander and JVR both have value, but I'd prefer Werenski and Jenner. D are harder to find than small wingers. As for JVR and Jenner, both are talented, both have the ability to score 30, it just comes down to preference. All 4 players have good value, no one listed here is garbage. Just doesn't make sense for CBJ IMO.

Nylander is 6'0 and plays centre (all the time in the AHL and NHL last year) and is just moving to wing this year due to our depth at centre now and Babcock wants him to break in there.

Just thought I'd point that out since there a subtle jab made, centres like Nylander who have first line C potential have great value on the market I'd imagine.
 
Jul 10, 2003
14,054
1,221
KW
Nylander for Werenski straight up is worth consideration from both sides. Both players drafted 8th overall just one year apart. Nylander with an extra year of development is a bit safer. The RHD thing is overblown since both Rielly and Werenski do just fine on their 'wrong' side.
 

CBJWerenski8

Rest in Peace Johnny
Jun 13, 2009
43,768
26,829
Nylander for Werenski straight up is worth consideration from both sides. Both players drafted 8th overall just one year apart. Nylander with an extra year of development is a bit safer. The RHD thing is overblown since both Rielly and Werenski do just fine on their 'wrong' side.

No its not. Nylander is a fine prospect, value might be fair, but we need defenseman.
 

Menzinger

Kessel4LadyByng
Apr 24, 2014
42,130
34,746
St. Paul, MN
Value fine for Toronto, but would have zero interest in that trade.

I think it's foolish for the Leafs to trade any of their bluechip guys - particularly a centre like Nylander.
 

JohnnyJacket13

(formerly PD9)
Sponsor
Jan 14, 2015
4,870
2,561
Columbus
Nylander for Werenski in a vacuum is fair.

But in the Jackets case, I would prefer Werenski just because he stabilizes their future blue line, and also we have Dubois coming up, with Wennberg, Jenner and Dubinsky already at C.
 

Menzinger

Kessel4LadyByng
Apr 24, 2014
42,130
34,746
St. Paul, MN
Nylander for Werenski in a vacuum is fair.

But in the Jackets case, I would prefer Werenski just because he stabilizes their future blue line, and also we have Dubois coming up, with Wennberg, Jenner and Dubinsky already at C.

Which is totally understandable.

The same goes with me and Nylander - I see him giving the Leafs an excellent centre core once he and Matthews hit their primes.
 

AvroArrow

Registered User
Jun 10, 2011
18,953
20,237
Toronto
Both teams say no. Leafs need a strong veteran presence. And Willie may be our 2C or 1st line RW for the next decade. Love Werenski, but after seeing what Nylander has been able to do at every level thus far i would be unwilling to move him. Value is there imo, but since JVR is close to being a UFA i can see why some posters feel it favors Tor. But either way i would pass.
 

Soups On

Registered User
Apr 27, 2012
3,913
2,254
Strictly in terms of value, I think it's fair. But like many have said, don't see either team doing it.
 

DrTucker

Registered User
Jan 29, 2015
337
4
Halifax
Value is pretty close, maybe a small add for Toronto, but it would only be a small add. As A leaf fan I would prefer Jenner over JVR, but not so much as to blow a ton of assets to acquire him.
 

Cynick

Know-Nothing
Dec 24, 2008
3,756
514
Toronto
I'd take Nylander over Werenski and Jenner over JVR (really like JVR but Jenner is a building block-type player on any team). I think the value is probably there, depending on how much you value each individual player (they're all very good/going to be very good) but I would keep/take Columbus' players by a hair or two.
 

bobg1

Registered User
Sep 21, 2006
968
21
bc
Nylander and Werenski is probably a wash - Columbus has some good defenseman in their system as it is and can afford to part with him if it did land them a potential #1C

However Jenner and JVR isn't all that close, as much as I really do like JVR, he's got 2 years left, Jenner is RFA still after his contract and is younger and therefore does hold more value.

Yes because JVR is more valuable than Jenner. These comments of yours are inanely untrue
 

PG Canuck

Registered User
Mar 29, 2010
63,606
25,637
Not sure how many forwards CBJ needs. They might value Werenski more because he plays D.
 

stevo61

Registered User
Jul 5, 2011
11,850
13,427
Canada
Not sure how many forwards CBJ needs. They might value Werenski more because he plays D.

Yeah management rushed things before and it fell flat so now the focus turned to building the D and then add the forwards. Youth and skill, they could possibly go into next season with their oldest top 4 defender being 25. I doubt Werenski displaces JJ right off the bat but through the season I think he will make it interesting
 

indigobuffalo

Portage and Main
Feb 10, 2011
6,790
559
Winnipeg MB
Terrible for both teams. IMO CBJ gets the better value but they just dealt a major piece last year to acquire a top-end defensive prospect, and are still pretty weak on the backend.

Werenski is a hugely important piece to the CBJ organization.

They don't really need that package.

And including Jenner seems wildly unnecessary. Leafs have ample forward prospects. Seems like a "and I'll also take that player I really like" type add-on for no good reason.

Lastly, Toronto needs to give Nylander time to establish himself. He needs to establish that he's a legit NHLer at his age/draft valuation.

Other teams are just treating him like a dud prospect that Leaf fans are trying to unload rather than giving him the respect he deserves as a top prospect.
 

PG Canuck

Registered User
Mar 29, 2010
63,606
25,637
Yeah management rushed things before and it fell flat so now the focus turned to building the D and then add the forwards. Youth and skill, they could possibly go into next season with their oldest top 4 defender being 25. I doubt Werenski displaces JJ right off the bat but through the season I think he will make it interesting

With the addition of PLB in the system and some pretty good younger forwards already producing, I don't think it's absolutely necessary.

As you said, they seem to be build from the defense onward this time.
 

leaflover

Stanley Cup 2022
Mar 3, 2002
15,239
2
beautiful B.C
Visit site
leafs fans saying no :biglaugh::biglaugh::biglaugh::biglaugh:

I'm one of them. Toronto is still in the beginning of the rebuild and despite nice looking potential they have no idea what they really have. This is a development and assessment season and next year may just be another one. I'm more interested in identifying where the team is at first, afterwards you can make adjustments based on knowledge rather than assumptions.
I absolutely love Jenner, and Werenski's potential, like some Leafs prospects looks wonderful, but just like them nobody knows for sure. So the value is probably quite good, unfortunately the timing isn't right yet
I guess I have more patience than most here and I'm not scared to take more time and make sure things are right.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad