Prospect Info: Tom Willander: 11th Overall 2023 Draft (Rogle BK J20) - Part 02

Vector

Moderator
Feb 2, 2007
27,091
45,583
Junktown
I'm still 100% expecting him to join the Canucks after the NCAA season this year and never play a minute in the AHL.

I just don't see it. That's usually what happens but given the Canucks will be acquiring another one or two defencemen in that time and already have Desharnais signed for next season, it seems like the plan is to slow burn him.

I'd love if I'm wrong since it means he's able to make an impact on a playoff team.
 

StickShift

In a pickle 🥒
Feb 29, 2004
7,423
6,338
New York
I think he'll be in the AHL for almost the entire season next year.
I think they will trade him first if they think he requires an entire year in the AHL.

This team's window is now. If he isn't capable of having clear NHL impact that will help this team win it all—I think Rutherford and Allvin's modus operandi is to go all-in on players that they think can help them go for it.

The way the roster is constructed they have a clear incentive to make the most of the cheap contracts and peak age curves they have now and add to that roster. See Scenario #1 below.

Yes, I understand that having a cheap-young defenseman would help with when the rest of the roster becomes more expensive, See Scenario #2 below. But that plan also requires on other players remaining healthy, signing reasonable deals so you aren't capped out or getting rid of talent, and that those other players are not falling off a cliff. There's a lot more variables you have to account for.

In short, the case for keeping Willander is only if he makes a big step this year and shows that he can provide immediate NHL impact. If there is still any project-ness about his game we should anticipate him being on the trade block.

2024-
25
2024-
25
2025-
26
2025-
26
2026-
27
2026-
27
2027-
28
2027-
28
LevelSalaryLevelSalaryLevelSalaryLevelSalary
MillerGreatMidGreatMidGood?MidGood?Mid
HughesGreatCheapGreatCheapGreatCheapGreatExpensive
PetterssonGoodExpensiveGreatExpensiveGreatExpensiveGreatExpensive
DemkoGreatCheapGreatCheapGood?ExpensiveGood?Expensive
BoeserGreatMidGreatExpensiveGreatExpensiveGreatExpensive
GarlandGoodMidGoodMidGoodExpensiveGoodExpensive
HronekGoodExpensiveGoodExpensiveGoodExpensiveGoodExpensive
Scenario #1
Win-now trade
2024-
25
Level
2024-
25
Salary
2025-
26
Level
2025-
26
Salary
2026-27
Level
2026-
27
Salary
2027
-28
Level
2027
-28
Salary
Acquire Top-3 Defensemen (EG, Rasmus Andersson, etc.)GoodBargain or MidGoodBargain or MidGoodExpensiveGoodExpensive
Willander (traded away)BadBargainMidBargainMidBargainMidBargain
Scenario #2
Youth
immediate impact
2024-
25
Level
2024-
25
Salary
2025-
26
Level
2025-
26
Salary
2026-
27
Level
2026-
27
Salary
2027-
28
Level
2027-
28
Salary
Willander (kept)MidBargainGoodBargainGoodBargainGoodBargain
 

credulous

Registered User
Nov 18, 2021
3,913
5,163
I wonder if Willander does a 3rd season in BU instead. Similar to Faber or something.

maybe if he transfers to another program but there's no way he goes back to BU. he'd be sharing the ice with cole hutson and sascha boumedienne again
 

arttk

Registered User
Feb 16, 2006
19,107
11,005
Los Angeles
I'm still 100% expecting him to join the Canucks after the NCAA season this year and never play a minute in the AHL.
I think that might be too risky for this management group. Trying to ease a rookie in during a playoff run doesn’t sound like a JR/Allvin thing.
 

MS

1%er
Mar 18, 2002
55,559
91,159
Vancouver, BC
I just don't see it. That's usually what happens but given the Canucks will be acquiring another one or two defencemen in that time and already have Desharnais signed for next season, it seems like the plan is to slow burn him.

I'd love if I'm wrong since it means he's able to make an impact on a playoff team.

I think that might be too risky for this management group. Trying to ease a rookie in during a playoff run doesn’t sound like a JR/Allvin thing.

To be clear, I'm not saying he'll be a roster regular or play every game. But I think he'll be signed, added to the roster, and play some games this year.
 
  • Like
Reactions: arttk and Vector

VanJack

Registered User
Jul 11, 2014
22,431
15,880
Watching the current Canuck blueline struggle mightily at times this season they'd be crazy to sell on Willander.

I mean how many seasons can you keep signing UFA's like Cole, Forbort, Desharnais, Soucy and even Myers, who'll be 35 before the end of the current season?

You simply can't acquire much more than 'stop-gap' solutions these days when it comes to trading or signing d-men in the NHL. Legit top-four d-men are too valuable to trade, and even if you acquire a guy like Zadorov at the TDL for valuable draft picks, chances are you won't be able to re-sign him.

So the only way to upgrade your blueline, is through the draft. And when you finally find a good one, particularly a right-shot defender like Wilander, you hold on for dear life.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad