NotCommitted
Registered User
- Jul 4, 2013
- 3,105
- 4,392
We are only a few years away from days when some players chose to not have ANY eye protection whatsoever because they thought their comfort on ice (or however they phrase it) is more important.
Goalies wearing masks that wouldn't allow opponents to INTENTIONALLY get their stick through any gap is quite a stretch, don't you think? When like the most essential requirement to play the position is about being visually able to track the puck well.
Well if Tkachuk can do it that easily intentionally from a weird angle & position, I imagine it could quite easily happen accidentally as well, potentially with way worse consequences.
To me the job of a goalie's mask is to protect the goalie and that should include protection from getting their eyes poked out by the blade of a stick. There are several game situations where that could happen completely by accident and with enough force to ruin your eye for good. I guarantee you if we have a goalie lose an eye by an accident like that, they'll all be forced to wear the kind of gear that makes sure it never happens again.
Again, I'm in no way defending Tkachuk here and sure, you can never protect the players against "everything", but IMO this falls into the category which can easily be protected against. Ask the question, which are the most likely things to hit a goalie in the eye? Clear number one is the puck of course, but the blade of the stick would seem obvious no2 and it doesn't seem a stretch to me the equipment should protect against that.
We are also not so far removed from days when most goalies wore cages, which had their downsides but certainly did a far better job of protecting their eyes. Dominik Hasek seemed to track the play OK despite the visual obstruction.