Tkachuk pokes Quick in the eye after the whistle - UPD: 2 Game Suspension

NotCommitted

Registered User
Jul 4, 2013
3,105
4,392
We are only a few years away from days when some players chose to not have ANY eye protection whatsoever because they thought their comfort on ice (or however they phrase it) is more important.

Goalies wearing masks that wouldn't allow opponents to INTENTIONALLY get their stick through any gap is quite a stretch, don't you think? When like the most essential requirement to play the position is about being visually able to track the puck well.

Well if Tkachuk can do it that easily intentionally from a weird angle & position, I imagine it could quite easily happen accidentally as well, potentially with way worse consequences.

To me the job of a goalie's mask is to protect the goalie and that should include protection from getting their eyes poked out by the blade of a stick. There are several game situations where that could happen completely by accident and with enough force to ruin your eye for good. I guarantee you if we have a goalie lose an eye by an accident like that, they'll all be forced to wear the kind of gear that makes sure it never happens again.

Again, I'm in no way defending Tkachuk here and sure, you can never protect the players against "everything", but IMO this falls into the category which can easily be protected against. Ask the question, which are the most likely things to hit a goalie in the eye? Clear number one is the puck of course, but the blade of the stick would seem obvious no2 and it doesn't seem a stretch to me the equipment should protect against that.

We are also not so far removed from days when most goalies wore cages, which had their downsides but certainly did a far better job of protecting their eyes. Dominik Hasek seemed to track the play OK despite the visual obstruction.
 

CowbellConray

Registered User
Sep 8, 2010
2,536
1,680
I think the league should give him 2 games to stop him from being so over the top with the goalie. He is constantly in the crease trying to get goalies off of their game. If the NHL wants to stop it, give him a couple games and hope the league has now set a standard to stop Matthew from putting himself in these accidentally on purpose situations
 

Chairman Maouth

Retired Staff
Apr 29, 2009
26,538
13,378
Comox Valley
I can't stand Quick, but that was dirty as all hell. Kachook knew exactly what he was doing and deserves a lengthy suspension for intent to injure a player's eye - followed by a significant beatdown next time he plays against the Kings.
 

Filthy Dangles

Registered User*
Sponsor
Oct 23, 2014
30,328
43,000
I feel like that's a pretty massive stretch to say that was intentional.

Cat eye goalie masks only have a very specific spot that it's even possible to do this in and Tkachuk was behind Quick. Want to suspend him for the result? Whatever, but to say that was intentional is insane.

Edit: let me rephrase here, I don't think he intentionally got it under Quick's mask, but the action wasn't unintentional.

You are wasting a lot of words and time to defend a nonsensical -point. You admit he meant to give Quick a stick to the face, and it wound up catching him in the eye....what are you even arguing
 

Primary Assist

The taste of honey is worse than none at all
Jul 7, 2010
6,148
6,316
Instead of suspending him just make him play the next 5 games without a helmet. He'll clean up his act real quick
 

teugen

cats on a rampage
Dec 30, 2015
593
712
That was really stupid by Tkachuck, but you gotta hate watching Quick clowning the whole f***ing game also.
 

TheDawnOfANewTage

Dahlin, it’ll all be fine
Dec 17, 2018
13,298
19,746
You are wasting a lot of words and time to defend a nonsensical -point. You admit he meant to give Quick a stick to the face, and it wound up catching him in the eye....what are you even arguing

Right? I think the claim is akin to “I only meant to pretend to poke you in the eye, I didn’t mean to actually poke you in the eye!” Ok, end result is the same, don’t give a shit about your intentions. “I didn’t mean to blow shit up, I only pulled on the pin as a joke! Oh come on, how am I responsible for the damages the grenade caused?”
 

hangman005

It's my first day.
Apr 19, 2015
29,494
44,854
Iceland II the hotter crappier version.
185143.jpg


But in all seriousness, suspend him.
 

Knies iT

Registered User
Mar 6, 2015
5,187
6,077
6
I feel like that's a pretty massive stretch to say that was intentional.

Cat eye goalie masks only have a very specific spot that it's even possible to do this in and Tkachuk was behind Quick. Want to suspend him for the result? Whatever, but to say that was intentional is insane.

Edit: let me rephrase here, I don't think he intentionally got it under Quick's mask, but the action wasn't unintentional.
Lol what is the point of this post.
 

Beezeral

Registered User
Mar 1, 2010
10,030
5,225
I’ll say the same thing in the game day thread. What Tkachuk did was unacceptable and if he’s suspended, he deserves it.

Though let’s also throw some shade at quick for selling the shit out of the play because the stick was barely in there and he acted like he lost an eye.

Once again for the people in the back. Tkachuk’s actions were unacceptable, but Quick deserves some criticism as well for the flop.
 

Ratsreign

Registered User
Mar 12, 2018
4,822
7,143
I’ll say the same thing in the game day thread. What Tkachuk did was unacceptable and if he’s suspended, he deserves it.

Though let’s also throw some shade at quick for selling the shit out of the play because the stick was barely in there and he acted like he lost an eye.

Once again for the people in the back. Tkachuk’s actions were unacceptable, but Quick deserves some criticism as well for the flop.
Yes, Tkachuk will be punished, as he should be.
But, when it happened live I thought it was just another instance of the bobblehead Quick’s mask suddenly flying off whenever the opposition starts really putting the pressure on around The King’s net. I know it actually doesn’t happen very frequently, but Quick has done that several times over the years vs FL.
 

GoldenBearHockey

Registered User
Jan 6, 2014
10,342
4,356
Yes, Tkachuk will be punished, as he should be.
But, when it happened live I thought it was just another instance of the bobblehead Quick’s mask suddenly flying off whenever the opposition starts really putting the pressure on around The King’s net. I know it actually doesn’t happen very frequently, but Quick has done that several times over the years vs FL.

You would be so much more believable, if this happened DURING the play.....it was AFTER the whistle.
 

WhiskeyYerTheDevils

will post scouting reports for food**
Sponsor
Apr 27, 2005
35,908
35,473
**or compliments
I’ll say the same thing in the game day thread. What Tkachuk did was unacceptable and if he’s suspended, he deserves it.

Though let’s also throw some shade at quick for selling the shit out of the play because the stick was barely in there and he acted like he lost an eye.

Once again for the people in the back. Tkachuk’s actions were unacceptable, but Quick deserves some criticism as well for the flop.
Total sell job from quick agreed.
 

ItWasJustified

Registered User
Jan 1, 2015
4,742
6,036
3 cm is "not even close" now? Lmao.

Imagine thinking swinging your stick in someone's face when you have a full 3 cm in reserve is dangerous. Audacious.
He's got a cage that protects him. No need to throw himself on the ice and grab his helmet.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad