Tim Stutzle vs Auston Matthews Contracts Included

[ViewsFromThe6ix]

Were talking about the leafs have never won 3 rounds ever, how is that even possible.

Posts like this are kinda why I hate this website. Instead of actually providing value to the discussion, its just childish bickering that has nothing to do with the topic at hand.

The post I was replying to suggested that if Stutzle was an okay playoff player, that poster would take him. The Sens haven't made the playoffs once in 4 years with him, partly because him and Tkachuk can't play defence. So the cap space is useless no?

 

[Golden_Jet]

Posts like this are kinda why I hate this website. Instead of actually providing value to the discussion, its just childish bickering that has nothing to do with the topic at hand.

The post I was replying to suggested that if Stutzle was an okay playoff player, that poster would take him. The Sens haven't made the playoffs once in 4 years with him, partly because him and Tkachuk can't play defence. So the cap space is useless no?

4 is less than 20 or ever

 

[ViewsFromThe6ix]

4 is less than 20 or ever

Why are you so unwilling to engage in a rational, thoughtful discussion?

 

[TheDoldrums]

I'm a simple man. If I see Auston Matthews being compared to a guy with less goals than Calle Jarnkrok, its a pretty simple decision.

 

[Namikaze Minato]

I'm a simple man. If I see Auston Matthews being compared to a guy with less goals than Calle Jarnkrok, its a pretty simple decision.

Yeah but youre missing the part where the extra cap space bought them Tarasenko! I mean, he also has less goals than Calle Jarnkrok but if you add them together they almost add up to be within 10 goals of Matthews!

 

[Ninety7]

Still absurd that anyone would take steutzle.

I mean he’s no slouch, but matthews is a legitimate super star.

 

[Golden_Jet]

Yeah but youre missing the part where the extra cap space bought them Tarasenko! I mean, he also has less goals than Calle Jarnkrok but if you add them together they almost add up to be within 10 goals of Matthews!

Also adds up to 12 more points,

 

[Namikaze Minato]

Also adds up to 20 more points, or 74% more points.

Combined, they cant score more goals than Mitch Marner, and they make more money than him!

 

[Golden_Jet]

Combined, they cant score more goals than Mitch Marner, and they make more money than him!

Yep the Sens players had a hand in 34% more goals.

 

[Namikaze Minato]

Yep the Sens players had a hand in 74% more goals.

How many more wins that translate to?

Edit: Also thats terrible math and untrue.

 

[Joe n]

Why are you so unwilling to engage in a rational, thoughtful discussion?

children are going to act like children

 

[MCR74]

Yeah but youre missing the part where the extra cap space bought them Tarasenko! I mean, he also has less goals than Calle Jarnkrok but if you add them together they almost add up to be within 10 goals of Matthews!

For one year at least.

 

[Golden_Jet]

How many more wins that translate to?

Edit: Also thats terrible math and untrue.

ya your right, I went by games not points for AM, my bad. 12 points, 34%.

 

[POVERTY]

Lmao HFBoards, Stu really won this huh

 

[Martin Skoula]

Also adds up to 12 more points,

Matthews scores 1 goal = 1 point
Stutzle passes to Tarasenko for a goal = 2 points

STUTZLE AND TARASENKO CONTRIBUTED TO 100% MORE POINTZZ!!!

 

[AvroArrow]

Leave it to Senators fans to turn this thread into the Leafs playoff history lmao, standard when losing an argument.

 

[Golden_Jet]

Matthews scores 1 goal = 1 point
Stutzle passes to Tarasenko for a goal = 2 points

STUTZLE AND TARASENKO CONTRIBUTED TO 100% MORE POINTZZ!!!

2 points > 1 point,
Thanks tips, most of us new that.

 

[AvroArrow]

2 points > 1 point,
Thanks tips, most of us new that.

Just so I have this right, you are saying

Stutzle passes to Tarasenko, Tarasenko scores. it's 1 goal, but both players get a point. That is greater than Matthews also scoring 1 goal without an assist on it ? Please confirm or deny.

 

[Martin Skoula]

Just so I have this right, you are saying

Stutzle passes to Tarasenko, Tarasenko scores. it's 1 goal, but both players get a point. That is greater than Matthews also scoring 1 goal without an assist on it ? Please confirm or deny.

It’s basic math dude, 2 is 100% more than 1

 

[Golden_Jet]

Just so I have this right, you are saying

Stutzle passes to Tarasenko, Tarasenko scores. it's 1 goal, but both players get a point. That is greater than Matthews also scoring 1 goal without an assist on it ? Please confirm or deny.

Great so we end up back at those 2 players provide more offence than 1 players salary.
So we’re back to thread topic, nice.

 

[Namikaze Minato]

Great so we end up back at those 2 players provide more offence than 1 players salary.
So we’re back to thread topic, nice.

They both equal 1 goal. You really arent very good at numbers, eh?

 

[Golden_Jet]

They both equal 1 goal. You really arent very good at numbers, eh?

And you obviously weren’t good at following along the discussion today, Shocking.

 

[Namikaze Minato]

And you obviously weren’t good at following along the discussion today, Shocking.

Is it 74% more shocking?

The real fun part is how you still havent figured out how your incorrect math is still incorrect.

34% more combined points does not equal 34% more goals.

Hence they show you how a goal with both Stutzle and Tarasenko can occur and it goes so far over your head you start taking 1+1 = 2 as a victory

 

[MCR74]

Is it 74% more shocking?

The real fun part is how you still havent figured out how your incorrect math is still incorrect.

34% more combined points does not equal 34% more goals.

Hence they show you how a goal with both Stutzle and Tarasenko can occur and it goes so far over your head you start taking 1+1 = 2 as a victory

He's gotta take what he's got.

 

[AvroArrow]

Great so we end up back at those 2 players provide more offence than 1 players salary.
So we’re back to thread topic, nice.

No please confirm or deny the question I asked, I am serious. Please if you can just confirm.