what jose bautista inferred to reporters on saturday is technically right: In the first two games of the american league championship series, he and his teammates were getting fewer favourable borderline calls from umpires — if you believe the math behind the analytics platform trumedia’s calculations on the subject.
According to espn, trumedia’s math shows the blue jays got more strikes called against them on pitches thrown in parts of the zone, during specific counts wherein there is only a 25 percent or less chance that these pitches actually get called strikes — on average.
That’s a mouth full, isn’t it? I mean, i feel like you could make an argument with math like that to justify any batch of numbers.
Basically, it’s a stat-heavy way of saying the averages went against the jays, over two games, on about seven pitches. And those averages are based on results from the “average†pitcher, which one could immediately argue that (at least) corey kluber and andrew miller are not.
i don’t know about you, but, i’d much rather stay quiet and focus on hitting the next pitcher than make any kind of insinuation about how the game or the umpires are treating me unfairly. Especially in the alcs, when there is zero time or appetite for excuses among fans, and not with such a shaky argument.
Unfortunately, when bautista says that he can’t comment on umpiring and that the media should look into certain “circumstances†about the jays’ recent inability to hit indians’ pitching, let alone score, he has - given the alternative of simply remaining silent - pointed the finger elsewhere and made an ugly excuse.