Definitely his fault Zub was a minus four and Forsberg could stop anything in the third.We play worse when he's in the lineup
If he can work on and improve his positioning and reaction times then I choose him over chychrun. Otherwise I’d rather work with chychrun.Chabot on pace for 15g 50pts
Career average 12g 49pts
Takeaways vs. Giveaways best since 2017-2018
Playing almost exactly his career average at 23:56/game
He’s -3, team is -25
If he can work on and improve his positioning and reaction times then I choose him over chychrun. Otherwise I’d rather work with chychrun.
And he should.I’d only take Chychrun over Chabot if he comes in $2 million less.
And he should.
I don’t know if I take Chychrun even then. He makes as many mistakes as Chabot defensively and doesn’t have the same ability to dominate.I’d only take Chychrun over Chabot if he comes in $2 million less.
I feel bad for him honestly. At least he got some experience with Karlsson in 2017Is there a current NHL player with a worse losing season to winning season ratio than Chabot? Dude is 27 and has never been on a team with a winning record or a positive goal differential.
Came in right as the team started being terrible. Has to wear on him mentally.
I don't feel that bad. There are a lot of good players who have been saddled to bad teams. Rarely do one of these players get moved and then everyone realizes they're amazing. It's more likely that these "good players" are a big reason why the teams they're on suck.I feel bad for him honestly. At least he got some experience with Karlsson in 2017
Reminds me of Ristolainen.Is there a current NHL player with a worse losing season to winning season ratio than Chabot? Dude is 27 and has never been on a team with a winning record or a positive goal differential.
Came in right as the team started being terrible. Has to wear on him mentally.
Is there a current NHL player with a worse losing season to winning season ratio than Chabot? Dude is 27 and has never been on a team with a winning record or a positive goal differential.
Came in right as the team started being terrible. Has to wear on him mentally.
Jeff Skinner is about to hit 1000 games in the NHL and he's yet to play in a single playoff game. 14 years, no postseason. Rasmus Ristolainen is up there too, though he has a shot to make it this year.Is there a current NHL player with a worse losing season to winning season ratio than Chabot? Dude is 27 and has never been on a team with a winning record or a positive goal differential.
Came in right as the team started being terrible. Has to wear on him mentally.
You see this sort of thing quite a bit - I'm reminded of those Florida Panthers team of the mid 2000's with guys like Nathan Horton and Jay Bouwmeester. Every year people were thinking they were on the cusp of a breakout, but it just never came.I don't feel that bad. There are a lot of good players who have been saddled to bad teams. Rarely do one of these players get moved and then everyone realizes they're amazing. It's more likely that these "good players" are a big reason why the teams they're on suck.
In Chabot's case, I think when he first came into the league he was a good two-way guy who put a lot of effort into defending. As time went on he either lost a step or simply gave up caring about defending.
Yes this is probably the best way of putting it. There is no way any of our current players are a core member on a contending team.You see this sort of thing quite a bit - I'm reminded of those Florida Panthers team of the mid 2000's with guys like Nathan Horton and Jay Bouwmeester. Every year people were thinking they were on the cusp of a breakout, but it just never came.
It turns out those guys were more suited to being support pieces rather than core guys that could be built around. In fact, both of those guys went on to win Stanley Cups once they were slotted a little lower in the lineup of a good team.
When you're rebuilding somebody has to be anointed as 'the core', but that doesn't necessarily mean they're good enough to have success in that role.
I don't understand the...it's rare when half the teams make the playoffs. That's 50% of teams. In the 96-97 season 61% of teams made the playoffs. It'll be more common that players don't make the playoffs these days unless more teams are added to the playoffs.Jeff Skinner is about to hit 1000 games in the NHL and he's yet to play in a single playoff game. 14 years, no postseason. Rasmus Ristolainen is up there too, though he has a shot to make it this year.
It's becoming a pretty rare thing in a league where half the teams make the ploffs.
You see this sort of thing quite a bit - I'm reminded of those Florida Panthers team of the mid 2000's with guys like Nathan Horton and Jay Bouwmeester. Every year people were thinking they were on the cusp of a breakout, but it just never came.
It turns out those guys were more suited to being support pieces rather than core guys that could be built around. In fact, both of those guys went on to win Stanley Cups once they were slotted a little lower in the lineup of a good team.
When you're rebuilding somebody has to be anointed as 'the core', but that doesn't necessarily mean they're good enough to have success in that role.
Based on discussion on Tij Iginla, I was checking out Jerome Iginla and his draft year stats and such. What stood out to me and is in line with this discussion, is that when he first came into the NHL, his first 2 games were playoff games and then he went 7 straight years without making the playoffs and the first year that they did after the 7 years, they went to the Cup against the Lightning in 2004 (see below).I don't feel that bad. There are a lot of good players who have been saddled to bad teams. Rarely do one of these players get moved and then everyone realizes they're amazing. It's more likely that these "good players" are a big reason why the teams they're on suck.
In Chabot's case, I think when he first came into the league he was a good two-way guy who put a lot of effort into defending. As time went on he either lost a step or simply gave up caring about defending.
Chabot has looked better as of late when he’s not injured. There’s still the odd defensive lapse and gaffe though. $8 m cap hit is high though and ideally would be lower. Going to be an interesting off-season and one of the issues will be what to do with our defense.Yep.
Chabot puts up (as a career average) the same number of goals, 5pts more.
He also excels in transition and move them puck out of the zone, where Chychrun does not.
So it’s not even a “let’s get a better player for less” it’s “let’s keep the lesser player for less.”
I’d like to max out at $5.5 for Chychrun but it’s not likely.
Chabot is not really worth $8 and Chychrun is worth $2 million less than whatever Chabot is worth. Given salary inflation since Chabot signed, I’d be ok with JC at $6 I guess
Maybe Ristolainen? I guess this year in Philly is looking to buck the trend, but he's 29 and yet to make the playoffs. Girgensons is another, 30, always playing in Buf with no playoffsIs there a current NHL player with a worse losing season to winning season ratio than Chabot? Dude is 27 and has never been on a team with a winning record or a positive goal differential.
Came in right as the team started being terrible. Has to wear on him mentally.
It looked like thatWhen he scored last night, did he skate by and ignore Kastelic or did I see that wrong?