Rumor: Things Not Left Unsaid: Flyers Rumors & Media Mentions

Status
Not open for further replies.

Chicken N Raffls

Here for the chaos and lolz
Nov 7, 2022
3,948
8,145
Douglassville
1qjZV8pMLOkc2N70Pf.gif
 

flountown

Registered User
Dec 30, 2008
1,434
35
Philadelphia
I did a little historical look at what has come of offseason goalie trades. Spoiler alert, there's some positive results, but extremely underwhelming vs. commentary from the Rumor and Trade Talks forum when Hart is brought up. I am not fully for one way or the other, I just disagree that if you are 100% trade or 100% keep, you are wrong, and only the Sith speak in absolutes.

 

Beef Invictus

Revolutionary Positivity
Dec 21, 2009
130,881
172,064
Armored Train
I did a little historical look at what has come of offseason goalie trades. Spoiler alert, there's some positive results, but extremely underwhelming vs. commentary from the Rumor and Trade Talks forum when Hart is brought up. I am not fully for one way or the other, I just disagree that if you are 100% trade or 100% keep, you are wrong, and only the Sith speak in absolutes.



That sounds like an absolute
 

deadhead

Registered User
Feb 26, 2014
51,408
22,405
I did a little historical look at what has come of offseason goalie trades. Spoiler alert, there's some positive results, but extremely underwhelming vs. commentary from the Rumor and Trade Talks forum when Hart is brought up. I am not fully for one way or the other, I just disagree that if you are 100% trade or 100% keep, you are wrong, and only the Sith speak in absolutes.


Mrazek was a conditional 4th that didn't meet the conditions for a 3rd, I think the 2nd 3rd was conditional on them signing him after the season.
 

flountown

Registered User
Dec 30, 2008
1,434
35
Philadelphia
Mrazek was a conditional 4th that didn't meet the conditions for a 3rd, I think the 2nd 3rd was conditional on them signing him after the season.

Good looking out.

Doesn't break the post, just makes me feel better about Mrazek's disappointment, got Attard with the pick that didn't convey!
 

DancingPanther

Foundational Titan
Jun 19, 2018
34,318
72,594
I did a little historical look at what has come of offseason goalie trades. Spoiler alert, there's some positive results, but extremely underwhelming vs. commentary from the Rumor and Trade Talks forum when Hart is brought up. I am not fully for one way or the other, I just disagree that if you are 100% trade or 100% keep, you are wrong, and only the Sith speak in absolutes.


If you're 100% on trade, then you aren't wrong. In fact, you would be right
 

Ghosts Beer

I saw Goody Fletcher with the Devil!
Feb 10, 2014
22,786
16,534
I did a little historical look at what has come of offseason goalie trades. Spoiler alert, there's some positive results, but extremely underwhelming vs. commentary from the Rumor and Trade Talks forum when Hart is brought up. I am not fully for one way or the other, I just disagree that if you are 100% trade or 100% keep, you are wrong, and only the Sith speak in absolutes.


The Schneider and Varlamov trades serve as a baseline.

Ideally, you'd want Montreal's 5th overall in a Hart trade.

But, barring that, St. Louis' 10th overall, or maybe Calgary's 16th overall. (These are teams with goaltending struggles that pick in the first half of Round 1.)

After that, it becomes less appealing.
 

BernieParent

In misery of redwings of suckage for a long time
Mar 13, 2009
25,254
46,155
Chasm of Sar (north of Montreal, Qc)
The Schneider and Varlamov trades serve as a baseline.

Ideally, you'd want Montreal's 5th overall in a Hart trade.

But, barring that, St. Louis' 10th overall, or maybe Calgary's 16th overall. (These are teams with goaltending struggles that pick in the first half of Round 1.)

After that, it becomes less appealing.
iu
:)sarcasm:)

I'd love to think that Hart could bring back a top-16 pick in the upcoming draft. For the same reason you and I covet a high pick in this packed draft, these teams are likely not dealing one (at least their own) away for a goaltender. From the media reports, Montreal is comfortable with Montambeault, and I don't see St. Louis or Calgary moving away from Binnington or Markstrom, respectively, at present.

My ideal scenario in a Hart trade would be to LA for Jordan Spence (RHD prospect), their 2024 1st, and Petersen.
 

GKJ

Global Moderator
Feb 27, 2002
194,014
44,065
iu
:)sarcasm:)

I'd love to think that Hart could bring back a top-16 pick in the upcoming draft. For the same reason you and I covet a high pick in this packed draft, these teams are likely not dealing one (at least their own) away for a goaltender. From the media reports, Montreal is comfortable with Montambeault, and I don't see St. Louis or Calgary moving away from Binnington or Markstrom, respectively, at present.

My ideal scenario in a Hart trade would be to LA for Jordan Spence (RHD prospect), their 2024 1st, and Petersen.
Think you can get another piece there to take on Petersen’s contract
 
  • Like
Reactions: BernieParent

GKJ

Global Moderator
Feb 27, 2002
194,014
44,065
Thanks, GKJ. I was thinking of that but an extra 3rd or later would be icing on the cake. Do you think Briere could do better than that?
LA wants to push chips to the middle, they think they’re right there, so I think they could get aggressive here to solve a long-term problem, especially since they have a year to figure out Hart’s contract. I’m not so sure they want to trade Spence though, I think they want to make room for him. They will want to dump Sean Walker too, though his contract is less prohibitive.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BernieParent

BernieParent

In misery of redwings of suckage for a long time
Mar 13, 2009
25,254
46,155
Chasm of Sar (north of Montreal, Qc)
LA wants to push chips to the middle, they think they’re right there, so I think they could get aggressive here to solve a long-term problem, especially since they have a year to figure out Hart’s contract. I’m not so sure they want to trade Spence though, I think they want to make room for him. They will want to dump Sean Walker too, though his contract is less prohibitive.
Thanks, GKJ. I targeted LA specifically for not just their goaltending need but their wealth of young RHD. While I won't shoot the moon and ask for Clarke, Spence is young and their second best RHD prospect. Gun to head, I would take Durzi but would want an additional pick/prospect. Walker is not helpful at all for this rebuild: 28 years old and 1 year left on his contract.
 

Rebels57

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Sep 28, 2014
78,250
125,931
Thanks, GKJ. I targeted LA specifically for not just their goaltending need but their wealth of young RHD. While I won't shoot the moon and ask for Clarke, Spence is young and their second best RHD prospect. Gun to head, I would take Durzi but would want an additional pick/prospect. Walker is not helpful at all for this rebuild: 28 years old and 1 year left on his contract.

Honestly i'd trade Hart for Clarke straight up if possible.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BernieParent

GKJ

Global Moderator
Feb 27, 2002
194,014
44,065
Thanks, GKJ. I targeted LA specifically for not just their goaltending need but their wealth of young RHD. While I won't shoot the moon and ask for Clarke, Spence is young and their second best RHD prospect. Gun to head, I would take Durzi but would want an additional pick/prospect. Walker is not helpful at all for this rebuild: 28 years old and 1 year left on his contract.

Walker would be helpful in that you could flip him at the deadline. He is RHD, and teams always want that.

Honestly i'd trade Hart for Clarke straight up if possible.

It’s not.
 

BernieParent

In misery of redwings of suckage for a long time
Mar 13, 2009
25,254
46,155
Chasm of Sar (north of Montreal, Qc)
Walker would be helpful in that you could flip him at the deadline. He is RHD, and teams always want that.



It’s not.
If Walker is an add-on to the deal, that's fine, but if he is to be a key element in the deal I'm a bird in the hand type when it comes to trades: flipping Walker requires additional steps, he could get injured before the TDL, and it is likely he will make the team more competitive in the interim, which both worsens the 2024 pick and reduces prospect ice time.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rebels57

Redpath

Registered User
Sep 30, 2011
3,436
5,342
The case for trading Hart is similar to Provorov.

There is certainly a chance that some team covets Hart more than he is actually worth and could be robbed. The question is if Briere is smart enough to find that GM and gut him.

Hart has a reputation as a strong, young goalie. Sometimes that is all that matters.
 
Last edited:

GKJ

Global Moderator
Feb 27, 2002
194,014
44,065
If Walker is an add-on to the deal, that's fine, but if he is to be a key element in the deal I'm a bird in the hand type when it comes to trades: flipping Walker requires additional steps, he could get injured before the TDL, and it is likely he will make the team more competitive in the interim, which both worsens the 2024 pick and reduces prospect ice time.
He’s not going to make team demonstrably better. You take a cap dump and flip him later. This is what teams at the bottom of the league do, you still need guys to play the games.
 

BernieParent

In misery of redwings of suckage for a long time
Mar 13, 2009
25,254
46,155
Chasm of Sar (north of Montreal, Qc)
He’s not going to make team demonstrably better. You take a cap dump and flip him later. This is what teams at the bottom of the league do, you still need guys to play the games.
Thanks again for your reply. I'll leave sentence 1 as a difference of opinion since I don't have time to dig into stats (not that I am convinced they will prove my point). I already covered the cap dump aspect in my previous point; i.e., not a key element of the deal. I don't see this team having a pressing need to fill roster spots, though. As it stands, they have 5 defensemen signed for next season and will certainly re-sign York, plus they should be looking to find NHL ice time for prospects.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad