tigervixxxen
Optimism=Delusional
That's stupid. Downie is married. It's a shame to assume that Downie is a cheater just to fit their narrative.
What's up with this?
*******, this thread is ugly as hell.
For the record, my bias hopes Varly is clear, but you kids need a few lessons in what it means to be female in the world.
Jesus.
Everyone here would agree that *IF* he did what he's accused of, he should be punished for it. Right now there are only accusations without proof of anything. Innocent until proven guilty.
Darren dreger said yesterday that Philly was pushing for that trade for 2-3 weeks now. So philly wanted to do the trade more than the avs. That puts any speculation to rest. However the varlamov situation may have facilitated the trade just so they can get some media attention off of varly. That's the only sort of relation I see.
Where else was she supposed to go? Your house? She lived with him. She was new to the US. He shut off her credit cards. She didn't have a job here. She probably had no knowledge of where a battered woman's shelter is.
She did it after he packed her things.
The impression I got was that she did it because he packed up her things
That's exactly what she said.
Who is that Terry Frei they interviewed at CBC radio?
This guy seems pretty weird/stupid to me.
Full interview -> http://www.cbc.ca/player/Sports/Audio/ID/2415698024/
How about calling lawyer/ambulance/police straight ahead after the beatings occurred? What she was telling is that he beat he like it was wwe Friday night smackdown. I am sure anyone would be willing to check himself for internal bleeding or broken ribs. She did it after he packed her things.
I get that and it's certainly possible that was the final straw and he did hurt her. But we are looking at this alleged incident only and for an account of how bad he beat her and then she leaves the house to tend other things and then later on changes her mind and decides to call the police is a lot of holes to fill. Did she encounter anyone when she went out? Why didn't she ask for help then? Even if you cant speak english you can go to a public place and show enough distress to get someone to call 911. Why didn't she call her friend immediately if she was so scared and ask her to call the police? The timeline of her leaving and calling the police is going to be important, the longer the gap between the more holes they can poke in the story.
Have you ever known anyone that was a beating victim? It doesn't make an awful lot of sense to you or me, but the victim usually DOES GO BACK to the man or woman that's making their life a living hell. There's no rhyme or reason to it, but it happens. And it's a common thread in people that are victims of this crime. They accept apology, believe things are going to change, and then they go back and it ensues again. People can't believe that she went back to his apartment and all that, but it's pretty typical behavior in this situation. If the person never went back, we'd have a LOT less domestic violence.
I believe the final straw here was that he set her things outside, because she didn't know what to do. I mean you've seen the interviews - she can't obviously speak English well (if at all? I haven't seen her say more than 2 words in English). No money, no English, no real friends here to speak of except all the ones she's met through Varly.......The only one she could depend on was a Russian friend that was the lawyer's wife........I just don't see how you guys expect her to be this independent free will person that knows the standard protocol of what to do in an emergency and where to go. Most of us have lived here for 20+ years.....She's brand new to the country and can't speak English. There's a learning curve of years in there before she is fully aware of how this society works and what services are offered and where.
This whole situation is the reason violence and abuse centers are set up - so that victims have a place to go that is comfortable, can adequately take care of them, and can fill in the gaps and give some people comfort of mind that they don't have to go back - someone else can be there for them and they have a place to stay that is safe and dependable. But I also believe there's no freaking way in hell that this girl knows where those centers are.
I get that and it's certainly possible that was the final straw and he did hurt her. But we are looking at this alleged incident only and for an account of how bad he beat her and then she leaves the house to tend other things and then later on changes her mind and decides to call the police is a lot of holes to fill. Did she encounter anyone when she went out? Why didn't she ask for help then? Even if you cant speak english you can go to a public place and show enough distress to get someone to call 911. Why didn't she call her friend immediately if she was so scared and ask her to call the police? The timeline of her leaving and calling the police is going to be important, the longer the gap between the more holes they can poke in the story.
He's a writer for the Denver Post and he's kind of a moron. Some people might tell you that's an understatement.
Who is that Terry Frei they interviewed at CBC radio?
This guy seems pretty weird/stupid to me.
Full interview -> http://www.cbc.ca/player/Sports/Audio/ID/2415698024/
It's sad when the best sports writer at your paper is Woody Paige.
Everyone here would agree that *IF* he did what he's accused of, he should be punished for it. Right now there are only accusations without proof of anything. Innocent until proven guilty.
Have you ever known anyone that was a beating victim? It doesn't make an awful lot of sense to you or me, but the victim usually DOES GO BACK to the man or woman that's making their life a living hell. There's no rhyme or reason to it, but it happens. And it's a common thread in people that are victims of this crime. They accept apology, believe things are going to change, and then they go back and it ensues again. People can't believe that she went back to his apartment and all that, but it's pretty typical behavior in this situation. If the person never went back, we'd have a LOT less domestic violence.
I believe the final straw here was that he set her things outside, because she didn't know what to do. I mean you've seen the interviews - she can't obviously speak English well (if at all? I haven't seen her say more than 2 words in English). No money, no English, no real friends here to speak of except all the ones she's met through Varly.......The only one she could depend on was a Russian friend that was the lawyer's wife........I just don't see how you guys expect her to be this independent free will person that knows the standard protocol of what to do in an emergency and where to go. Most of us have lived here for 20+ years.....She's brand new to the country and can't speak English. There's a learning curve of years in there before she is fully aware of how this society works and what services are offered and where.
This whole situation is the reason violence and abuse centers are set up - so that victims have a place to go that is comfortable, can adequately take care of them, and can fill in the gaps and give some people comfort of mind that they don't have to go back - someone else can be there for them and they have a place to stay that is safe and dependable. But I also believe there's no freaking way in hell that this girl knows where those centers are.
Snap judgement based on little information:
I imagine the domestic violence portion of all of this is probably pretty straight forward. What I find very interesting/alarming is the kidnapping charge. That's a pretty serious charge to sling at someone. Given their (Varly + Accuser) situation, I'm curious to see how they go about prosecuting that charge.
No way that's sticking.
I'm inclined to agree. I am very curious to see how they are going to try though.
Section 18–3–302(1), 8 C.R.S. (1978), provides that “[a]ny person who knowingly, forcibly, or otherwise seizes and carries any person from one place to another, without [her] consent and without lawful justification, commits second degree kidnapping.” The movement of the victim necessary to sustain a second degree kidnapping conviction need not be substantial. The “incidental movement” test, which requires that the movement must be more than incidental to the commission of some other underlying offense that is related to the kidnapping, applies only to first degree kidnapping and not to second degree kidnapping. People v. Abbott, 690 P.2d 1263 (Colo.1984); People v. Bridges, 199 Colo. 520, 612 P.2d 1110 (1980). The statutory definition of second degree kidnapping merely requires “movement of the victim from one place to another,” Abbott, 690 P.2d at 1270, and this requirement is clearly satisfied when the movement itself, although short in distance, results in a demonstrable increase in risk of harm to the victim. See Yescas v. People, 197 Colo. 379, 593 P.2d 358 (1979).