GDT: The Trade Deadline Thread

DRW204

Registered User
Dec 26, 2010
23,071
28,558
Why Stastny wasn’t moved doesn’t make much sense in my eyes. He’s not re-signing here by all accounts. Have to honestly how much 26 was in Chevys ear to keep him with the Jets. Didn’t get the Sanford pickup purely that we have David Gustafsson in the minors ready to go.

Otherwise, good to get apples back and I think while not a first rounder, like the deal they got for Copp if Barron works out. Worried about his foot speed but time will tell.
Wheeler didn't want Stastny moved. They still want to compete. They didn't even offer him up or take calls.
 

bumblebeeman

Registered User
Mar 16, 2016
2,042
1,376
This is exactly what I hoped for today. Get some futures for Copp, but also shore up the bottom 6 for cheap. I wouldn't have minded trading a defenseman away, but they all have term so maybe that is an offseason option.
 
  • Like
Reactions: hockeyarena

DRW204

Registered User
Dec 26, 2010
23,071
28,558
If scheifele does indeed go, and we do not get a strong top6 in that trade (which Is plausible) . Our is C depth is laughable. PLD I know we all love him, and I do too, however a ~60 pt 1C who isn't a Selke guy is not good enough for cup aspirations. Maybe that changes with a bit more TOI with Scheifele gone.
 

JetsFan815

Replacement Level Poster
Jan 16, 2012
19,697
25,793
Why Stastny wasn’t moved doesn’t make much sense in my eyes. He’s not re-signing here by all accounts. Have to honestly how much 26 was in Chevys ear to keep him with the Jets. Didn’t get the Sanford pickup purely that we have David Gustafsson in the minors ready to go.

Otherwise, good to get apples back and I think while not a first rounder, like the deal they got for Copp if Barron works out. Worried about his foot speed but time will tell.

Some have managed to find a way to blame 26 even for the trade deadline. Sad!
 

tbcwpg

Moderator
Jan 25, 2011
16,688
20,175
Pretty dismal TDL imo.

+ Appleton is a plus.
- Smith hurts.
- Losing Copp for a couple 2nd round conditional picks. Ouch.
- Rental Sanford? Why...

Because this team is no longer a Playoff contender, were going to struggle to acquire and keep talent.

I have a feeling this is foreshadowing for what's to come this Summer.

PLD potentially signing is the only glimmer of hope we have.

If PLD's gone, this team is Toast.

It's 2 2nds guaranteed, with one being maybe a 1st. Framing it as just a "couple of conditional 2nd round picks" is putting the most negative spin possible on it.
 

B33R LEAGUE

"Just another day at the office" -Byfuglien
May 19, 2021
3,317
10,432
It's 2 2nds guaranteed, with one being maybe a 1st. Framing it as just a "couple of conditional 2nd round picks" is putting the most negative spin possible on it.
Wasnt my intention to mislead. That was the term used by TSN. I guess I should have known better than to quote TSN :)

1647909001601.jpeg
 

B33R LEAGUE

"Just another day at the office" -Byfuglien
May 19, 2021
3,317
10,432
well they are both conditional 2nd round picks, just 1 can move up and become a first and the other we can choose between what years, perhaps it would be better to read the full details of the trade
I know what the full details of the trade are my friend. I just didn't realize that the term "conditional 2nd round pick" was incorrect. What is the correct term? Conditional 1st round pick? I feel like im calling it a potato, when i should have called it a po-tat-o. Give me a break...
 

gojetsgo

Registered User
Nov 1, 2015
11,200
31,540
I know what the full details of the trade are my friend. I just didn't realize that the term "conditional 2nd round pick" was incorrect. What is the correct term? Conditional 1st round pick? I feel like im calling it a potato, when i should have called it a po-tat-o. Give me a break...
the way you phrased it was like we had the opportunity to get 2nd round picks not that they were guaranteed 2nd round picks with other conditions
 

B33R LEAGUE

"Just another day at the office" -Byfuglien
May 19, 2021
3,317
10,432
the way you phrased it was like we had the opportunity to get 2nd round picks not that they were guaranteed 2nd round picks with other conditions
Fair enough. It was an honest mistake. All i can do is provide a source and apologize for my nomenclature. Im incredibly sorry.
 

tbcwpg

Moderator
Jan 25, 2011
16,688
20,175
I know what the full details of the trade are my friend. I just didn't realize that the term "conditional 2nd round pick" was incorrect. What is the correct term? Conditional 1st round pick? I feel like im calling it a potato, when i should have called it a po-tat-o. Give me a break...

They are kind of correct terms, I'd call one a conditonal first myself, but maybe I was misreading your intention there. Calling them two conditional 2nds in the context you did felt very negative.
 
  • Like
Reactions: B33R LEAGUE

Ad

Upcoming events

  • HV 71 @ Lulea Hockey
    HV 71 @ Lulea Hockey
    Wagers: 3
    Staked: $213.00
    Event closes
    • Updated:
  • Croatia vs Portugal
    Croatia vs Portugal
    Wagers: 1
    Staked: $25.00
    Event closes
    • Updated:
  • Luxembourg vs Northern Ireland
    Luxembourg vs Northern Ireland
    Wagers: 4
    Staked: $52,050.00
    Event closes
    • Updated:
  • Poland vs Scotland
    Poland vs Scotland
    Wagers: 1
    Staked: $25.00
    Event closes
    • Updated:
  • Serbia vs Denmark
    Serbia vs Denmark
    Wagers: 1
    Staked: $25.00
    Event closes
    • Updated:

Ad

Ad