The state of the Habs Rebuild - The Next step

What note you give to Kent Hughes' Rebuild? ?

  • A

    Votes: 209 48.8%
  • B

    Votes: 158 36.9%
  • C

    Votes: 45 10.5%
  • D

    Votes: 6 1.4%
  • E

    Votes: 2 0.5%
  • F

    Votes: 12 2.8%

  • Total voters
    428

WeThreeKings

Demidov is a HAB
Sep 19, 2006
95,743
107,501
Halifax
I think both those guys are getting traded soon. Does it make sense to bench them if that’s what you’re going to do?

Yes - what message is it sending to the team about accountability if you just let them go out there after they make crippling, stupid mistakes?

And worse than that, they don't even lose opportunities they gain them.

Matheson got his PP1 spot back from Hutson.
Dvorak got to go out on a 5-on-3 and then start 3-on-3 overtime.

The only people Marty has done anything to this year is Dach, Slaf and Xhekaj. That's some bullshit.
 
  • Like
Reactions: morhilane

Lafleurs Guy

Guuuuuuuy!
Jul 20, 2007
79,056
50,549
Yes - what message is it sending to the team about accountability if you just let them go out there after they make crippling, stupid mistakes?

And worse than that, they don't even lose opportunities they gain them.

Matheson got his PP1 spot back from Hutson.
Dvorak got to go out on a 5-on-3 and then start 3-on-3 overtime.

The only people Marty has done anything to this year is Dach, Slaf and Xhekaj. That's some bullshit.
Nothing sends the message of accountability more than getting traded away. If we are looking to trade those guys - and we should be - then benching/demoting doesn’t make sense. It’s a lost season anyways.

Get what you’re saying but I suspect there’s more going on here.
 

Gaud

Registered User
May 11, 2017
1,730
673
Imagine you are Hugues and Gorton what are you next 5 moves ?

Can you dress me a list of the next things we need to do to make the Habs contender in the long run?

Im very curious!
I guess im more optimistic than most Habs fans, though I am a little puzzled at how bad we are playing - i wasnt expecting the playoffs, but i was expecting something like .500

I am thinking our RD sucks. I was a little perplexed at the Kovacevic trade, as he is exactly what we would need now. I thought it meant Mailloux had convinced Mtl coaches and management that he was ready. Guhle is awesome even at RD, but id like him to be LD. Savard is drowning in there. If you want points, i think this is where you invest your money. However, do we want points and will what you need to give up impede on what you plan for the rebuild?

Primeau is a problem for me. I think he could be nhl level, but honestly, i question his mental fortitude. His post game interviews make me wonder if he just gets psyched out. Also, those are god aweful interviews - i always feel like he is giving hints as to how to beat him with jewels like "Once they scored three times onmy glove hand, it got in my head " . Monty seems ok, lets just put a goalie behind him that has exp.
 

WeThreeKings

Demidov is a HAB
Sep 19, 2006
95,743
107,501
Halifax
Nothing sends the message of accountability more than getting traded away. If we are looking to trade those guys - and we should be - then benching/demoting doesn’t make sense. It’s a lost season anyways.

Get what you’re saying but I suspect there’s more going on here.

And a team trading for Matheson is going to feel better about that watching that 3rd brutal goal against that he was directly responsible for?

He should have been benched before that.

Guys in the room aren't hearing he's on the block and being traded. The core and young players on the team need to see that it doesn't matter how many years you have in the league, what your contract is, if you are making stupid game costing mistakes or not putting in the effort, you don't get to play.. furthermore you don't get prime opportunities or bonus opportunities just cause.

Marty has taken the easy way out by only doing this to younger players. It's not a way to build a culture of anything. It's actually just showing he doesn't have a grasp on how to manage the team at all and is scared to rock the boat of his veterans.

He's low key being Rottenturd with Hutson on the PP at this point.
 
  • Like
Reactions: morhilane

The Gr8 Dane

L'harceleur
Jan 19, 2018
13,866
27,602
Montréal
He didn't. He was used as exploitation as soon as the team had first changeup. Danault was used as shutdown against the top lines. You could see it with Danault being paired with Weber on most shifts and Suzuki being paired with Petry. Go look it up, Suzuki got most of his points when Petry was with him.

Not saying he can't. Just saying that he wasn't in the cup run.
Everybody keeps running with the *Nick can do it narrative* lol. I guess it makes them feel good to pretend nick was shutting down top lines lol , the cope is insane.

And the entire run was fugazzi , got absolutely stomped by Tampa , rightfully so , Some people wanna use our cup run as some sort of blueprint.

They basically wanna run a bottom 10 on ice roster and hope and pray we win anything again , it sickens me.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Grate n Colorful Oz

Lafleurs Guy

Guuuuuuuy!
Jul 20, 2007
79,056
50,549
And a team trading for Matheson is going to feel better about that watching that 3rd brutal goal against that he was directly responsible for?

He should have been benched before that.

Guys in the room aren't hearing he's on the block and being traded. The core and young players on the team need to see that it doesn't matter how many years you have in the league, what your contract is, if you are making stupid game costing mistakes or not putting in the effort, you don't get to play.. furthermore you don't get prime opportunities or bonus opportunities just cause.

Marty has taken the easy way out by only doing this to younger players. It's not a way to build a culture of anything. It's actually just showing he doesn't have a grasp on how to manage the team at all and is scared to rock the boat of his veterans.

He's low key being Rottenturd with Hutson on the PP at this point.
Personally I’d have traded Matheson over the offseason so I’m not sure what they’re doing.

If they are trading those guys, then I probably would avoid benching them but I see your point.
 
  • Like
Reactions: WeThreeKings

Demigod

Registered User
Nov 13, 2024
49
82
To answer my own question I think the next five move have to be

1. Finding a number one RHD. At this point I don't think we can draft him because it would take to much time before he can fill the number 1 role. So we need to make a trade to get him.

2. We need a number 2 center. There's too many questions marks at this position and we don't know if any of our current players or prospects will be able to take this position. I think we can find a good number 2 center via Free agency this year or next year.

3. Im not into the fire St Louis train but he needs to have experience assistant to help him. In a perfect world St Louis would be assistant coach because I think he filled this role better by being a players coach and by his experience in the NHL as a HOF. But if he stay headcoach put a veteran coach by his side that can help him putting a good system and by giving good advices .

4. Get ride of the bad veterans : Armia, Dvorak. Trade Anderson, Savard at TDL for prospect or pick. Ill keep Gallaguer and Matheson at least another year because we need some veterans to lead the way.

5. Find a way to draft elite talent this year and next year maximum. After that you need to stop being in the run for the number 1 pick. Ideally in two years, our draft pick could be used to acquire players that can fill a spot in the roster via transfer. Until then use our second or third pick to acquire better pick. We have too much pick. Either we trade for prospects or we put picks together to get a better pick.

6. Pray that we can see some playoff before 2030
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: dcyhabs

morhilane

Registered User
Feb 28, 2021
9,231
11,948
Lot of rebuilding is based on draft pick. Sadly we are not lucky since we started drafting in the Top 5. Even if I like Slaf he is far from a Superstar / Franchise type of players. Getting a guy like Bedard or Celibrini would have been a better outcome but we cannot control that.
Getting Bedard and Celebrini haven't magically lifted the Sharks or Hawks from the depth of the standings. Both started their rebuild a year after the Habs and have older line-ups then the Habs.

And I'm going to tell you a secret, Bedard and Celebrini aren't starting from the dzone as much as Slaf is and both those teams have better vets then the Habs have. Slaf is currently 2nd to Evans among forwards in term of "quality of opposition" faced (only Guhle/Matheson face harder).
 
  • Like
Reactions: WeThreeKings

dcyhabs

Registered User
May 30, 2008
4,469
2,686
Montreal
Fans whining about the regression in performance and results makes it less likely the team shows better performances and results?

So what's the optimal practice for fans, in your opinion? Be quiet and cheer on the good (however small it is)? For how long, exactly?
When it will help. Bergevin had the big pieces, he needed secondary pieces, bug he mostly picked up guys who couldn’t play second pairing D while the stars got older and more injured. He needed to be pushed to make some short term moves.

Complain away, but short term moves are not what is needed now.
 

Demigod

Registered User
Nov 13, 2024
49
82
Getting Bedard and Celebrini haven't magically lifted the Sharks or Hawks from the depth of the standings. Both started their rebuild a year after the Habs and have older line-ups then the Habs.

And I'm going to tell you a secret, Bedard and Celebrini aren't starting from the dzone as much as Slaf is and both those teams have better vets then the Habs have. Slaf is currently 2nd to Evans among forwards in term of "quality of opposition" faced (only Guhle/Matheson face harder).
I still think a number 1 center is a better pick at the number 1 spot than a big winger.

If you have to pick between those 3 players who would you pick to start your team?

Between Bedard - Slaf and Celibrini. You can even rank them 1 to 3.
 
  • Like
Reactions: The Gr8 Dane

ReHabs

Registered User
Sponsor
Jan 18, 2022
8,329
12,688
When it will help. Bergevin had the big pieces, he needed secondary pieces, bug he mostly picked up guys who couldn’t play second pairing D while the stars got older and more injured. He needed to be pushed to make some short term moves.

Complain away, but short term moves are not what is needed now.
Most fans were bullied relentlessly for disagreeing with Bergevin's moves. If you thought he didn't win a trade, you were called a bad person (or worse). A part-time commentator in the English Montreal Gazette, Brendan Kelly, was non-stop shat on for having mildly contrarian takes.

And it's all over again. This community isn't a sports fandom, it's a religious movement. Zealots will not allow criticism of their cherished Montreal Canadians to land.

So I'm all done with the fan-punching. We're fans, this is a sports team, it's not a religious institutions, there is no afterlife. Fans have a plurality of positions and expectations. Some want more today, some accept less tomorrow. It is what it is.

(I don't disagree that short term moves are particularly necessary now)

Between Bedard - Slaf and Celibrini. You can even rank them 1 to 3.
I value 1C more than scoring W and big-body-W-who-doesn't-play-big. Celebrini, Bedard, Slaf.

Slaf could end up being the more upside and impactful in the playoffs but the floor is also lower. Bedard could be Kane-like once he gets up to speed. Anything could happen but Celebrini's poise is really attractive.
 

nhlfan9191

Registered User
Aug 4, 2010
20,052
18,306
Most fans were bullied relentlessly for disagreeing with Bergevin's moves. If you thought he didn't win a trade, you were called a bad person (or worse). A part-time commentator in the English Montreal Gazette, Brendan Kelly, was non-stop shat on for having mildly contrarian takes.

And it's all over again. This community isn't a sports fandom, it's a religious movement. Zealots will not allow criticism of their cherished Montreal Canadians to land.

So I'm all done with the fan-punching. We're fans, this is a sports team, it's not a religious institutions, there is no afterlife. Fans have a plurality of positions and expectations. Some want more today, some accept less tomorrow. It is what it is.

(I don't disagree that short term moves are particularly necessary now)


I value 1C more than scoring W and big-body-W-who-doesn't-play-big. Celebrini, Bedard, Slaf.

Slaf could end up being the more upside and impactful in the playoffs but the floor is also lower. Bedard could be Kane-like once he gets up to speed. Anything could happen but Celebrini's poise is really attractive.
I think the reactions you got about Bergevin’s moves kind of depended on what forum or social media platform you were using. I’ve been mostly using HFHabs for 10 years after I got tired of the toxic mainboard and I can’t really remember a time I got flamed for criticizing him vocally on his moves. In fact the few people that did attempt to defend him here were the ones who ended up getting attacked the worst. It seemed like most of the regulars here from 2016 right until MB was fired were mostly anti-Bergevin. That may have been different on places like twitter or Reddit but it’s hard to take those platforms serious when it comes to hockey talk. Way too many casual fans in those places or die hards that avoided this place because they refuse to actually criticize the team about anything.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Grate n Colorful Oz

ReHabs

Registered User
Sponsor
Jan 18, 2022
8,329
12,688
I think the reactions you got about Bergevin’s moves kind of depended on what forum or social media platform you were using. I’ve been mostly using HFHabs for 10 years after I got tired of the toxic mainboard and I can’t really remember a time I got flamed for criticizing him vocally on his moves. In fact the few people that did attempt to defend him here were the ones who ended up getting attacked the worst. It seemed like most of the regulars here from 2016 right until MB was fired were mostly anti-Bergevin. That may have been different on places like twitter or Reddit but it’s hard to take those platforms serious when it comes to hockey talk. Way too many casual fans in those places or die hards that avoided this place because they refuse to actually criticize the team about anything.
I was on twitter and reddit and it was intolerable. I don't write in French very well but French language communities were also full of cope and vinegar.

I dunno man, I always like reading contrarian takes and contrarian, off-beat analyses. We're not following an investment portfolio here, we want to have fun. If the team isn't winning or playing very well I don't think the fans should be happy.
 

nhlfan9191

Registered User
Aug 4, 2010
20,052
18,306
I was on twitter and reddit and it was intolerable. I don't write in French very well but French language communities were also full of cope and vinegar.

I dunno man, I always like reading contrarian takes and contrarian, off-beat analyses. We're not following an investment portfolio here, we want to have fun. If the team isn't winning or playing very well I don't think the fans should be happy.
I get people’s patience is wearing thin. It’s started to happen to me this season. I’m more frustrated with MSL then anyone else right this moment. I think people have been giving him to much rope playing the rebuild card. But the expectations when you are in a rebuild are different then let’s say Bergevin in 2018 when the team had a terrible offseason and finished in the bottom 5. Some point soon, you will see the tide start to shift on HuGo if things don’t turn around. We just aren’t at that point yet.
 

Miller Time

Registered User
Sep 16, 2004
24,490
17,445
I get people’s patience is wearing thin. It’s started to happen to me this season. I’m more frustrated with MSL then anyone else right this moment. I think people have been giving him to much rope playing the rebuild card. But the expectations when you are in a rebuild are different then let’s say Bergevin in 2018 when the team had a terrible offseason and finished in the bottom 5. Some point soon, you will see the tide start to shift on HuGo if things don’t turn around. We just aren’t at that point yet.

What's interesting to me is that it's the polar opposite of the Bergevin Era...

By year 3 it was painfully obvious that he was a bad manager, propped up by Price, PK and a resurgent post injury Markov and what was a very good roster & cap situation to work with.

But, the team had good results, so many fans were adamant in their support of him and of his "success" as a GM.

Today, we get the opposite. An organization with leadership doing many of the right things to build long term success, not willing to let ego and short sightedness drive poor short term decisions, and willing to take their lumps in the process... and a big chunk of fans are certain it's a sign of failure...

Hopefully, Molson isn't dumb enough to let the mob mentality push him of course.
 

The Gr8 Dane

L'harceleur
Jan 19, 2018
13,866
27,602
Montréal
I still think a number 1 center is a better pick at the number 1 spot than a big winger.

If you have to pick between those 3 players who would you pick to start your team?

Between Bedard - Slaf and Celibrini. You can even rank them 1 to 3.
Quite frankly its not even close and it also applies to guys like Martone or Byfield , although byfield does play C but he is also an ogre. Just an unlucky year , its fine though we will get another crack at the top 5

What's interesting to me is that it's the polar opposite of the Bergevin Era...

By year 3 it was painfully obvious that he was a bad manager, propped up by Price, PK and a resurgent post injury Markov and what was a very good roster & cap situation to work with.

But, the team had good results, so many fans were adamant in their support of him and of his "success" as a GM.

Today, we get the opposite. An organization with leadership doing many of the right things to build long term success, not willing to let ego and short sightedness drive poor short term decisions, and willing to take their lumps in the process... and a big chunk of fans are certain it's a sign of failure...

Hopefully, Molson isn't dumb enough to let the mob mentality push him of course.
Bergevin was a disaster anybody who couldn't admit it after 3 years was just a homer. This is a totally different situation we are literally rebuilding and bottoming out , something we never even though was possible in this market and now everybody is mad , the casual fans are actual idiots who don't follow hockey and the league , So it it what it is it's not gonna change.

Like you said I hope Molson/Hughes don't start trying to appease to the village idiot fans who ran subban out of town and praised BargainBin because he's a tit gars de chez nous high school drop out who made it
 
  • Like
Reactions: Miller Time

The Real Timo

Registered User
Jun 18, 2019
17,246
21,296
At this point... individual players will continue to be as bad as they are unless coaching change is made. I don't expect anyone to play any different than how they are playing now without fundamental changes to the system... which again implies have to change the coach. MSL had enough rope. Thanks Marty. Bon chance but you're done. Same goes for his assistants. Time to take a closer look at Hughes as well. Perhaps he too needs an experienced ex-GM to give him some clues.

it's been only 1/4 of the season and it already feels like we've suffered through 8 months of suckage. Things have to change NOW. Not in the summer. Not next season. Now.
 

nhlfan9191

Registered User
Aug 4, 2010
20,052
18,306
What's interesting to me is that it's the polar opposite of the Bergevin Era...

By year 3 it was painfully obvious that he was a bad manager, propped up by Price, PK and a resurgent post injury Markov and what was a very good roster & cap situation to work with.

But, the team had good results, so many fans were adamant in their support of him and of his "success" as a GM.

Today, we get the opposite. An organization with leadership doing many of the right things to build long term success, not willing to let ego and short sightedness drive poor short term decisions, and willing to take their lumps in the process... and a big chunk of fans are certain it's a sign of failure...

Hopefully, Molson isn't dumb enough to let the mob mentality push him of course.
Tables turned quick on Bergevin and Molson when Price got hurt early in 2016 and the team had that historical collapse which somehow didn’t lead to the very unpopular Therrien getting fired. That was when the foxhole was first exposed and Bergevin never recovered his reputation after that despite surviving another 5 seasons.
 

Lafleurs Guy

Guuuuuuuy!
Jul 20, 2007
79,056
50,549
At this point... individual players will continue to be as bad as they are unless coaching change is made. I don't expect anyone to play any different than how they are playing now without fundamental changes to the system... which again implies have to change the coach. MSL had enough rope. Thanks Marty. Bon chance but you're done. Same goes for his assistants. Time to take a closer look at Hughes as well. Perhaps he too needs an experienced ex-GM to give him some clues.

it's been only 1/4 of the season and it already feels like we've suffered through 8 months of suckage. Things have to change NOW. Not in the summer. Not next season. Now.
Why the urgency?

This team isn’t making the playoffs and as much as it’s not reflected in the record our play has improved a lot over the past ten games or so. Both weekend games could’ve gone either way and I actually think we were the better team in New York.

We came into this year with a club that had improved every year. With prospects that had been improving. There was optimism that we might be a .500 team and then it all came apart. Brutal year so far but we’re getting better.

If we ditch MSL, so be it. Maybe it’d be better for us to do so but I don’t see the hurry. The team has been improving and we’ve got Laine coming soon. Hopefully that improves things further. There’s no urgency to do anything big “ RIGHT NOW!!!” I mean why would there be? Worst case scenario we tank the year and get a high pick.
 

tazsub3

Registered User
May 30, 2016
5,860
6,402
Everybody is so negative and grumpy , we just had the best tank weekend of the year and all the negative Nancy's are mad. I must be the only one excited on the site
Because they convinced themselves that then team should be good , while hugo did all but say we tanking one more year .
The in the mix quote was a way to calm the media , but actions mean more then words.

You think any smart management would roll with Primeau as a back up and play him and expect to win ?
Many other examples like letting go of kovacevic .
Trading for laine was the anomaly but they still got a second for harris
 

Lafleurs Guy

Guuuuuuuy!
Jul 20, 2007
79,056
50,549
Tables turned quick on Bergevin and Molson when Price got hurt early in 2016 and the team had that historical collapse which somehow didn’t lead to the very unpopular Therrien getting fired. That was when the foxhole was first exposed and Bergevin never recovered his reputation after that despite surviving another 5 seasons.
As I mentioned, I had been so negative towards the Habs for so long. I really wanted to give MB the benefit of the doubt. But right out of the gate his moves were God awful. I had hopes that maybe getting Vanek would be a turning point but we played him on the 3rd line. It was just so stupid.

This management group is infinitely better. That doesn’t mean they haven’t or won’t make mistakes. Michkov could be one for example but at least there’s a plan. And we’ve accumulated a lot of talent. Both Hage and Hutson were gotten in trades for extra picks. We’ve got two more firsts this year… stockpiling young talent has been awesome.


The Dach Newhook trades were good but injuries have gotten in the way. I’m hopeful that Dach can come back but we’ll see.
 
  • Like
Reactions: HabbyGuy

ReHabs

Registered User
Sponsor
Jan 18, 2022
8,329
12,688
Tables turned quick on Bergevin and Molson when Price got hurt early in 2016 and the team had that historical collapse which somehow didn’t lead to the very unpopular Therrien getting fired. That was when the foxhole was first exposed and Bergevin never recovered his reputation after that despite surviving another 5 seasons.
I don't think the tables ever turned on Bergevin and especially not Molson. Some grumbling here and there but the fanbase and the city didn't have much negativity or hostility toward Bergevin. They threw Subban's name under the bus and many fans ate that up with two spoons and a ladle. Later we even saw hype jobs for "Minty" Kotkaniemi and whatever memes. Right up to the start of the first tank season 2021-2022 Bergevin was solidly above 50% approval at all times in his 10 years. Even as he entered his final season, the media largely felt he "earned" a contract extension. No one was clamoring for his firing. Geoff Molson offered him an extension.
 
  • Like
Reactions: The Gr8 Dane

Tabarouette

ben kin
Jan 28, 2013
15,270
5,299
mtl
Why the urgency?

This team isn’t making the playoffs and as much as it’s not reflected in the record our play has improved a lot over the past ten games or so. Both weekend games could’ve gone either way and I actually think we were the better team in New York.

We came into this year with a club that had improved every year. With prospects that had been improving. There was optimism that we might be a .500 team and then it all came apart. Brutal year so far but we’re getting better.

If we ditch MSL, so be it. Maybe it’d be better for us to do so but I don’t see the hurry. The team has been improving and we’ve got Laine coming soon. Hopefully that improves things further. There’s no urgency to do anything big “ RIGHT NOW!!!” I mean why would there be? Worst case scenario we tank the year and get a high pick.

I don't think there's any big rush but last night really broke me, removing Hutson from PP1 without a decent reason goes against everything this team is trying to do. Matheson had an abysmal game and he was *still* on PP1 at the end of the game where he turned the puck over to kill our comeback. A comeback that shouldn't have been because, he was already the main reason we got in this situation in the first place

These moves help no one, we just lost another demoralizing game to protect a trentenaire who most likely won't be here next season

I understand that there's no urgency to do any big dumb moves but to me there is urgency 25 games into a season to correct blatant shit like this, enough is enough
 
  • Like
Reactions: Demigod

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad