True the fluke was getting the opportunity to play them not the fact that the Big Guns stepped up and trounced them.Never argued for or against. I wouldn't call beating WPG, Vegas and the Leafs a fluke either.
True the fluke was getting the opportunity to play them not the fact that the Big Guns stepped up and trounced them.Never argued for or against. I wouldn't call beating WPG, Vegas and the Leafs a fluke either.
Key assets to load up on are Dmen and C. Wingers are typically not going to get your a C/D in return in trade unless you are dealing a higher end offensive winger away, like a Hall for Larsson type of move.
I agree.We still don’t make the playoffs with a normal schedule that year. That’s the reality. Anyone who thinks Price and Weber get a 1+ month rest going into those playoffs in any other division is coping or just lying.
How did you arrive at this conclusion, cause it really feels like you just made it up.
If you look at some of the biggest trades ever for defenseman, you might be surprised by what the key piece going the other way was...
Paul Coffey to Pittsburgh ... key piece coming back, winger Craig Simpson.
Ray Bourque to Colorado ... going the other way wingers Brian Rolston and Dave Andreychuk.
Chris Pronger to Hartford ... going the other way, winger Brendan Shanahan. (He was traded two other times with winger Joffrey Lupus the major piece coming back. Shanahan also goes from New Jersey to St. Louis... for Scott Stevens)
Rob Blake to Colorado ... winger Adam Deadmarsh is the key piece of the return.
The idea that wingers can't be traded for top defensemen is silly.
Not to be rude about it, but chances are people are finding your post criticizing the player(s) as meaningless.I think saying “be patient, it’s a rebuild” in response to people commenting on individual players and their regression is meaningless. It basically means “don’t complain, because I don’t like to see it”.
What?! It’s a sports discussion board!Not to be rude about it, but chances are people are finding your post criticizing the player(s) as meaningless.
How did you arrive at this conclusion, cause it really feels like you just made it up.
If you look at some of the biggest trades ever for defenseman, you might be surprised by what the key piece going the other way was...
Paul Coffey to Pittsburgh ... key piece coming back, winger Craig Simpson.
Ray Bourque to Colorado ... going the other way wingers Brian Rolston and Dave Andreychuk.
Chris Pronger to Hartford ... going the other way, winger Brendan Shanahan. (He was traded two other times with winger Joffrey Lupus the major piece coming back. Shanahan also goes from New Jersey to St. Louis... for Scott Stevens)
Rob Blake to Colorado ... winger Adam Deadmarsh is the key piece of the return.
The idea that wingers can't be traded for top defensemen is silly.
Totally agree.. it was never about Michkov v RB, but rather Michkov v CC.. they chose to keep CC, it is what it is.He's made other mistakes. I think betting on a skill player with a first round pick is generally fine tbh.
Fully agree. I was sanguine about the Reinbacher pick because it seemed the organization was completely convinced of it.
They bet on the bird in hand (CC + Reinbacher) over the one in bush (MM). It makes sense from a team building POV even if it is extremely frustrating to think about Michkov getting better and better. He's already outproducing Cooley and Slafkovsky ffs.
Apt. No doubt. Lol
Hold on a second...
Caufield = MSL
Suzuki = Vinny
Slaf = Stamkos
Demidov = Kucherov
Reinbacher = Hedman
Lafleur's Guy might be cooking
Be blindly optimistic about everyone until the whole board turns on him.What?! It’s a sports discussion board!
What else would we do than discuss players?? Everyone here expects to read posts about players and their performances. That’s why we’re here.
They were saying this to explain why the Habs picked RD Reinbacher over W Michkov. Now we’re meant to believe it isn’t true… with examples from when the World Wide Web was just getting started lolI'd say you have a pretty weak point to make if your examples are from 20+ years ago. It's VERY true that superstar/star wingers are valued less than superstar/star centers/defensemen. This isn't even up for debate.
In 5 years all the transition players you named will be young enough to still play a productive role in the team and they will still be under contract, For me a transition player is like Monteambeault/Matheson. Suzuki and CC will play the same role as Plekanec and Markov played for Patch/Price/Subban.Suzuki/CC/Dach/Newhook either managed to be so good that the rebuild was going to be shortened or there to be transition players.
Currently, they look like transition players, since HuGo haven't acquire and/or kept talent to go along with them to speed the rest up:
- a A1 goalie
- a top 4 RHD (or two depending how you look at it)
- a dependable 2 line center
They are in the pipeline thought (if they pan out), so in 5 years, the core could very well be Slaf/Lane/Vanya/Hage/Rein/Beck/Fowler...
The story is not written yet. So far we are still within the introduction.Michkov vs Reinbacher could've been a vastly different story if say Reinbacher didn't get hurt and Michkov was playing another year in the KHL.
I don't think it's that simple.Totally agree.. it was never about Michkov v RB, but rather Michkov v CC.. they chose to keep CC, it is what it is.