Hannibal
Fear the Weber
- Feb 11, 2007
- 11,095
- 8,609
He looked better, but still has to move his feet more. Like last season. When he has the puck, he stands still too much or slowing down too much.
He looked a hellofalot better last season from this season,why so slow out of the gate?He looked better, but still has to move his feet more. Like last season. When he has the puck, he stands still too much or slowing down too much.
He looked a hellofalot better last season from this season,why so slow out of the gate?
Hopefully for the team and the fans that he figures it out sooner than later otherwise it can become concerning.He still young and still trying to figure it out. Historically, bigger players are slow to start.
Hopefully for the team and the fans that he figures it out sooner than later otherwise it can become concerning.
From what I've read here,many thought Dach would be better or equal to Suzuki.He will. Loosing his spot for no reason to freaking Dach, didnt help though.
Yeah fefans always project 10-20 points more than anybody on this team ever actually does and they never learnFrom what I've read here,many thought Dach would be better or equal to Suzuki.
From what I've read here,many thought Dach would be better or equal to Suzuki.
It's because we're just a bunch of muppets on here.Yes last year before he lost a full year to a knee injury. Now we have people saying he's throwaway trash 10 games into a season.
we're not friends if you're putting buffalo sauce in your poutine
Pretty sure I read it much more recently than that, probably during camp. Regardless of when it was read or posted Dach has to be better than he has been to verify what he is. IIRC he was ready to go if Montreal made the playoffs, not that that was ever in the cards, but if he was, why so slow to get back as it's been a while. All the years of playing hockey and coaching, don't recall any forgetting how to play as that is how Montreal has appeared. Everyone pretty much just stepped right back in to what they were the previous seasons, perhaps it's how the train and practice as from what I've seen, they always appear slower and less intense than the opponents, until the match against New Jersey.Yes last year before he lost a full year to a knee injury. Now we have people saying he's throwaway trash 10 games into a season.
I feel like I'm being attacked.
He needs to be our Tage Thompson. That’s what he should be. I’m sorry but he’s pretty much invisible this year so far. 1 goal in 13 games or whatever? That’s not acceptable. Not after his second half last year.
Sure, why not. Let's just look at the finished product and ignore the growing pain, why our guy cannot be like their guy.
You understand how long it took for Tage Thompson to become Tage Thompson, right?
Tage Thompson was also a 27th overall and panned under a different organization. Yes patience but I'm not sure he's a good example.Sure, why not. Let's just look at the finished product and ignore the growing pain, why our guy cannot be like their guy.
You understand how long it took for Tage Thompson to become Tage Thompson, right?
Tage Thompson was also a 27th overall and panned under a different organization. Yes patience but I'm not sure he's a good example.
Slaf will be fine, I'm not concerned with his play. He'd do much better with Suzuki anyway.
Not match, but surely the ROI needs to be greater, otherwise why did we pick him first? That either happens with certainty or quality, not sure Slaf provides any of those but it was a bad year so.I don't selection rank matter in this context.
Unless we are dealing with the crazy expectation that 1OA should be absolutely able to match a 25 years old star because it's his third year. Just from the one I can think of quickly: Laf, Hughes, Hischier, MacKinnon couldn't.
Not match, but surely the ROI needs to be greater, otherwise why did we pick him first? That either happens with certainty or quality, not sure Slaf provides any of those but it was a bad year so.
Anyway, premature thread he's going to be fine, it's just that drawing such conclusions doesn't prove anything, you could also use Hugh Specimen as an example and the comparison would be of similar value. IE none.