Fjordy
Registered User
- Jun 20, 2018
- 16,683
- 9,123
Why would he play LD in 3rd pair? He always seems to play RD. If they trade for Jensen then he is a partner for Power or Byram in second pair.
The Roster Thread, Summer 2024
- Thread starter Chainshot
- Start date
- Status
Zman5778
Moderator
Dowd is a pretty perfect 4C on a good contract. Good on faceoffs, strong on the PK. Not going to give a lot offensively, but that's OK. Brings some veteran experience that isn't washed up like EJ was.
Jensen is a RD that is a little more rugged and can PK. Not 100% sure he can play 20 min a game anymore, but if he can give us 18 min of solid 5v5 and PK, that's plenty. Would be a good foil for one of our more offensive guys (specifically Power or Byram).
Both guys have been around (each joined the Caps the summer after they won the Cup) and have playoff experience. Both are still playable at a level which we need.
dickiedunnwrotethis
It's gotta be true.
If acquisition cost is factored in then I think DeBrusk is the most attractive winger target. His salary ask should also be significantly more palatable.
Fjordy
Registered User
- Jun 20, 2018
- 16,683
- 9,123
I like DeBrusk too, but Buch is a more productive and consistent player. The problem with DeBrusk is that he is a UFA, and I am skeptical that such UFAs will come to Buffalo.
My issue with that off-season movk is that somehow Dowd is supposed to be good enough as a 3c. I would not pay that acquisition cost to get him to be that role. Fourth line, of course! But I think that is setting sights way too low for a 3C for this team.
Zman5778
Moderator
I agree that Dowd would be a sub-optimal all-season 3C. Could he do in a pinch if our actual 3C gets hurt? Sure.
If we're keeping Krebs as 3C, I think that it would make a ton of sense to bring in Dowd as a 4C. Krebs could be a similar or better version of Dowd down the line, so have him learn from the original!
Fjordy
Registered User
- Jun 20, 2018
- 16,683
- 9,123
Dowd 4C and he will be 4C. Adams should also add 3C.
Please no
Zman5778
Moderator
I think Adams and Ruff like Krebs a lot more than this board does in general. I'll be pleasantly surprised if we get a clear upgrade on his spot, but I am in no way getting my hopes up.
I am fully expecting Krebs to be the 3C when camp starts and breaks.
Sabre the Win
Joke of a Franchise
- Jun 27, 2013
- 12,666
- 5,315
I mean Philadelphia are prime trade partners.. You could get Farabee and Frost for 11OV + a small add most likely. That gives you a 3C and a top 9 winger capable of moving up and down the lineup.
They seem like the perfect trade partners for what we need.
They seem like the perfect trade partners for what we need.
Fjordy
Registered User
- Jun 20, 2018
- 16,683
- 9,123
This is another half-measure that could cost us the playoffs and Adams his job. If one of Thompson or Cozens gets hurt or plays poorly, our center depth is destroyed. I think Adams needs to add a 3C after trading Mitts. Dowd is good, but he's a 4C, and Krebs can't get that kind of credit, no way.
Not sure I agree with 3c but I agree he is not as likely to be traded as folks here want to
Believe
I don't think anyone can reasonably guess they like Krebs. Who likes a highly skilled player who can't crack the top 6, elevate the third line, or be built to effectively play the 4th line? It is lip service. I would put Savoie on 3C as a bet before Krebs.
And this is exactly why they are a "one step up, two steps back" franchise.
There IS NO center depth right now!
Fjordy
Registered User
- Jun 20, 2018
- 16,683
- 9,123
So Adams needs to add a 3C and maybe a 4C. I'm not against Krebs, but let him play on the wing with Dowd and learn from him. Or he could be used in a trade (if that's what it takes to make a deal).
Fezzy126
Rebuilding...
- May 10, 2017
- 8,883
- 11,874
I've heard others echo this exact sentiment about Krebs as the 3C, I think we're starting to get caught up in line numbering semantics. Most teams have one of the following models for ice time distribution and roles at even strength:
- Top Line
- Middle 6
- 4th Line
- Top 6
- Bottom 6
The problem is if you read through articles talking about what every team needs in the offseason most of them have the same needs as the Sabres and are talking about the same players who may or may not be available. A decent 3C is tough to get. I'm hoping we can outbid other teams but it's definitely not going to be simple. REALLY don't want Scott Laughton.
Fairburn talked about having a first line and second line with a spare parts line that was a pale imitation of the rest, and one matchup line as the method they used under Granato. It seems Adams may have finally noticed conventional hockey wisdom and has decided to try something more akin to that by his comments. Now we'll see if he can do that based on his actions though.
Agree. I'm ok with Krebs as a future 4C with some work to do to get there. He's not ideal and if he's better as a trade piece so be it. As a 3C, this is just more "make-do on the cheap" from this franchise...which will be the end of me wasting my time as a Sabres fan.
Sabre the Win
Joke of a Franchise
- Jun 27, 2013
- 12,666
- 5,315
If Adams can get Frost and extend him we are set. If they can also add Farabee you give them 11OV + Jokiharju + 2025 4th round pick
There are people that think Cates is a line driver or better than Frost.. that's simply not the case, Frost's defense got better and Cates stayed the same, Frost has better offensive output to add to that.
There are people that think Cates is a line driver or better than Frost.. that's simply not the case, Frost's defense got better and Cates stayed the same, Frost has better offensive output to add to that.
As for line numbering and usage...either way Krebs has his work cut out for him to deserve significant ice time. Without anyone better to be adequate -> good for top 6/bottom 6/middle 6 duty, this team will be worse off by personnel. Ruff may be able to overcome that enough to make the playoffs, but after that the team doesn't stand a chance without MAJOR growth and improvement from TT/Cozens, and quality depth.
I think the PLAN at center is:
1. Thompson top offensive center
2. Cozens will be your two way matchup center.
3. Your secondary offensive center will be an internal fill (Savoie/Kulich/Ostlund)
4. 4th line center will be an outside add (via trade/UFA)
However, I think (and hope) that there will be a backup plan and one of the wingers brought in will have the ability to slot in that secondary offensive center role in a pinch. Someone like Max Domi or Matt Duschene.
thewookie1
Registered User
- Jan 21, 2015
- 1,541
- 1,312
Any idea if this chart takes into account Frost's extremely easy zone start skew of 70-30?
Dubi Doo
Registered User
- Aug 27, 2008
- 19,930
- 13,745
I haven't watched a ton of Jensen. I just know of him through the years I've watched the sport. My opinion is more based on reports that he had a down year last year. It seems possible that he may be slowing down. If that's the case- I think he'd at least be a good 3rd pairing guy, but we'd be hoping for more with that cap hit and term left at his age. The hope would probably be we get at least two more years of solid top-4 play.
Sabre the Win
Joke of a Franchise
- Jun 27, 2013
- 12,666
- 5,315
They got their data from Natural Stat Trick, its just the numbers presented there put into a chart/graph all in one easy read.
Doug Prishpreed
Registered User
Let's separate Frost from Farabee. Frost is a good target, Farabee is not.
With regards to Cates, I'd just say that Cates has more upside, that's the attraction to him. The only reason anyone talks about him is because his name came up in rumors at the last deadline. Not happening so much anymore, so maybe it's best to let go of any hopes on getting Cates.
With regards to Frost, it's speculated that Philly wants to trade him because his agent ALWAYS recommends that his players to to UFA. I don't want to give up a lot of assets to for a player who insisting on going to UFA.
- Status
