And he has better xGoal rates without each of them too, so all that says is that the pairings aren’t being utilized optimally.
You can go back to last year and get a fun picture regarding your second paragraph, if you don’t think on ice goaltending tells a story, you should look at Calen Addison in front of these same goaltenders. Gus put up a .933 with Addison being sub .900 on ice.
No, Faber has a worse xGoals rate without Brodin.
But also even then the comparison is that Faber is better than other RD such as: Mermis, Bogosian, Merrill, Addison.
Middleton did get a 150 minute showing with Spurgeon for the short time he was healthy. In that time they had a 61.5% xGoal rate (top 10 pairing in the league).
Sounds like Addison got pretty unlucky on a small sample size. Again, nothing more volatile than goalie performance. As you should know looking at save%s from last year to this year.
But hmmm, the Minnesota goalies went from 0.920s last year to sub 0.900 when faber got put into the lineup this year. CLEARLY he is making his goalies worse. Or perhaps goalies are just incredibly volatile and you shouldn't be crediting Dmen for the play of the goalies behind them.
Sometimes there are things that the stats can't tell. Patrick Kane for example was always analytically underrated offensively because his cross crease passes weren't valued as highly as they should have been, and this was a trend for many years.
A 1 year sample size of goaltending volatility does not paint a pattern