Tell me you didn't read the thread without telling me.
The post you quoted was a response to some hawks fan making an absurd comment.
The "absurd comment" was "I disagree. I think Bedard is the better player right now."
Overall responsibility and defensive game is another thing and guys need time for sure....but I think it's the faceoffs that moved him ore than anything.
None of this to defend his play on the D side....he hasn't been great and I never expected him to be, nor did anyone else I'd guess, so nothing really to see there.
Hughes really isn't that shaky defensively, and his underlying numbers support that. He's one of our better defenders. He's had some rookie moments this year, but that's usually when the team is pushing trying to create offense. When he's been asked to play in a more defensive role he's been very very good in that aspect. His skating ability such a huge advantage for him - he might be the fastest defenseman in the NHL already (he has the fastest clocked speed of any dman this year (24.2 mph), the most 22+ mph bursts, and the most 20+ mph bursts).Hughes was seen as the next Quinn Hughes/Adam Fox/Cale Makar, an offensive wizard vs Hughes started out slow but has taken off. He's shaky defensively, but he's providing the offense that everyone expected him to provide.
Nemec and Hughes have been blamed for Bahl, Siegenthaler, Marino, and Smith's failures this year.Hughes really isn't that shaky defensively, and his underlying numbers support that. He's one of our better defenders. He's had some rookie moments this year, but that's usually when the team is pushing trying to create offense. When he's been asked to play in a more defensive role he's been very very good in that aspect. His skating ability such a huge advantage for him - he might be the fastest defenseman in the NHL already (he has the fastest clocked speed of any dman this year (24.2 mph), the most 22+ mph bursts, and the most 20+ mph bursts).
I also don't think people expected him to be an elite offensive dman - he's more in the mold of a Heiskanen. A 2 way dman who can cover tons of ice with his world class skating.
I'll roll the grenade and say he already is (by a hair)How much will you give me if I roll a grenade into this mess and say that in three years the best defender from this rookie class will be Simon Nemec.
Oops…
Yea, Luke is only -3 at 5v5 despite a 988 PDONemec and Hughes have been blamed for Bahl, Siegenthaler, Marino, and Smith's failures this year.
It's wild. Luke and Nemec as a pairing have generated 64% of expected goals for NJD at even strength. That's top 5 in the NHL among pairings.
Also Luke specifically has his +/- tanked by empty net situations.
235 minutes stuck with noted terrorist Brendan Smith is also screwing luke.You understand what raw Corsi and Fenwick are right? They are just shot attempts for vs against. Using all situations when one guy plays way more PK than PP is deceptive. You are always going to have more shots against than for in that scenario. Every category you posted about says extremely little about player quality or impact, hits and blocks have almost no predictive power.
Minnesota Wild defenders, score and venue adjusted 5v5: Player Season Totals - Natural Stat Trick
Chicago Blackhawks defenders, score and venue adjusted 5v5: Player Season Totals - Natural Stat Trick
Use whatever filters you want, Seth Jones has horrible results while getting fed more than 50% Offensive zone starts. There are reasons that the models put Seth Jones in the category of worst contract value, he plays a lot of minutes, very poorly. This at least did give me a little clarity on why Blackhawks fans think TOI is meaningless, Seth Jones getting that much ice time really is a travesty.
Wait, all you have done in this thread is bash Bedard about his defence, and now you are touting Hughes?I think Faber has been the best rookie defenseman this year (and would be my vote for the Calder), but Luke Hughes has really started to close the gap down the stretch. Since mid March, he leads all rookies in scoring with 13 points in his last 13 games.
View attachment 848137
Any chance Faber had at the Calder pretty much evaporated with Hughes passing him in scoring.
I can't believe I got yelled down at the Hawks board like three weeks ago for saying they shouldn't necessarily extend him through UFA yearsView attachment 848083
This is his most common line mate this year. This is his card from last year.
The offense he’s generated this year is remarkable.
Luke Hughes is better defensively than Bedard.Wait, all you have done in this thread is bash Bedard about his defence, and now you are touting Hughes?
This is a good point. A lot of the "not Bedard" voters - if there are many - will likely see their votes split between Faber and Hughes.I think Faber has been the best rookie defenseman this year (and would be my vote for the Calder), but Luke Hughes has really started to close the gap down the stretch. Since mid March, he leads all rookies in scoring with 13 points in his last 13 games.
View attachment 848137
Any chance Faber had at the Calder pretty much evaporated with Hughes passing him in scoring.
Luke Hughes has been much better defensively than Bedard. Is this seriously a question?Wait, all you have done in this thread is bash Bedard about his defence, and now you are touting Hughes?
Kurashev is pretty underrated as a complimentary offensive player. He's got some legit skills. But he's terrible defensively, which makes Bedard's job that much harder. And he's not the type of guy who can create on his own.I can't believe I got yelled down at the Hawks board like three weeks ago for saying they shouldn't necessarily extend him through UFA years
This is a good point. A lot of the "not Bedard" voters - if there are many - will likely see their votes split between Faber and Hughes.
The only way I see Bedard not winning this, is if the people who really feel that Faber should win leave Bedard off of their ballots completely, and I hate the thought of that happening as it wouldn't show any integrity among the voters. Not that voter integrity for the NHL awards is really a thing, ha ha.
No, it would show no integrity if a voter wanted Faber to win so they left Bedard off of the ballot entirely. Regardless of who you feel should win, both of these players should be somewhere on the ballot for every single voter of this award. We've seen it in the past where voters did similar, which is why I mentioned it.It shows poor integrity to not blindly follow the conventional wisdom and established preseason hype?
Luke is a defenceman, I would hope he is better defensively. Not even a knock against Luke as it is really hard to be good defensively in the NHL as a 20 year old. Just calling out that particular poster who has been talking about Bedard’s defence non-stop.Luke Hughes is better defensively than Bedard.
Neither have been good, but Luke has been better.
Also would like to point out that bedard should 100% win the calder still
Bedard is a lucky guy, lolKurashev is pretty underrated as a complimentary offensive player. He's got some legit skills. But he's terrible defensively, which makes Bedard's job that much harder. And he's not the type of guy who can create on his own.
I know me and DHF are definitely with you on being cautious with a Kurashev contract.I can't believe I got yelled down at the Hawks board like three weeks ago for saying they shouldn't necessarily extend him through UFA years
He's got a terrible supporting cast, I'm not trying to argue any different. But Kurashev is a really skilled little player.Bedard is a lucky guy, lol
He’s really sturdy on his skates and a really decent forechecker; hes still always been way worse than the sum of his parts. He works hard like a coaches son would, but he just isn’t that good. As his 2022-2023 numbers suggest. I would be extremely cautious if I was Kyle Davidson.He's got a terrible supporting cast, I'm not trying to argue any different. But Kurashev is a really skilled little player.
He's got some skill and doubled his point total from a year ago in the same number of games. I wouldn't oversell it though. Ideally he'd be a skilled guy on a third line and he will be of prime age in a couple of seasons.He's got a terrible supporting cast, I'm not trying to argue any different. But Kurashev is a really skilled little player.