The Race for the Calder Trophy

Status
Not open for further replies.
I think you're living too much in your head on this one. My immediate response is to imagine a cup contender built over time, not in one year. Your line of thinking is far from obvious with that statement. It's confusing the issue as to who is having the best rookie campaign.
Perhaps I should have been more clear. I should have said "if was taking a guy for a playoff run".
 
  • Like
Reactions: quat
This doesn't make sense, Faber isn't a Number 1 Defenseman on a Stanley Cup winner
Why not?

, your standard is vague/inconsistent. If you're talking about ability to slide and scale down in role for a potential Stanley Cup winner in a rookie year, how is that not Bedard, he's an offensive dyanmo, put him in a spot with great support and guys that can do the defensive/board work, etc. and in a world where the best players don't go to the worst team, he could help someone win a Cup in a perfect situation as good, if not better than Faber right now.
Like I said, I could see a scenario depending on the team where Bedard makes more sense, especially if he's going to be playing on the wing.
 
He's not as good as Kucherov yet. But like I said, if you assume Bedard is playing wing I see merit to taking either.
I agree he's not currently as good as Kucherov is. But Bedard is pacing at about a point per game on this (utterly trash) Hawks team.

Look back at the 14-15 season for Kucherov; it's his sophomore year, he puts up 65pts in 82 games, and then goes and puts up 22 in 26 during the post-season. Bedard's regular season this year has been more impressive than that, so if you were to add him to any playoff team, you could realistically be adding a PPG game breaker to your forward group.

Don't know that I'd pass on that for Brock Faber.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Nona Di Giuseppe
What do you mean "why not"? He just isn't. Look at the standard of Active Number 1 Stanley Cup winning defensemen - Hedman, Makar, Pietrangelo.. that's the tier to be at. Faber isn't at that level as a rookie.
The 2016-17 Pens won with Brian Dumoulin and Justin Schultz as their top defenseman. 2005-06 Hurricanes it was Bret Hedican.

I also don't see him being very far behind Pietrangelo, if at all. Faber has arguably been a top 10 defenseman in the league this year, that's plenty good enough to be a 1D on a cup contender.
 
The 2016-17 Pens won with Brian Dumoulin and Justin Schultz as their top defenseman. 2005-06 Hurricanes it was Bret Hedican.
Exceptions to prove the rule.

When you have to pull completely out for an "if everything goes absolutely right around him" you can do the exact same thing with Bedard... Give him like a prime Marian Hossa on his wing to cover his deficiencies and he can play Center in a 1st line capacity on a Stanley Cup winner if everything goes perfectly.
 
I also don't see him being very far behind Pietrangelo, if at all. Faber has arguably been a top 10 defenseman in the league this year, that's plenty good enough to be a 1D on a cup contender.
This is a "Knies is a top 10 power forward in the NHL" as he was signing following the end of his college season level of opinion again. He is not a top 10 defenseman in the NHL his rookie year. You can't start projecting future onto the present if you are holding Bedard to a much more stringent standard.
 
This doesn't make sense, Faber isn't a Number 1 Defenseman on a Stanley Cup winner, your standard is vague/inconsistent. If you're talking about ability to slide and scale down in role for a potential Stanley Cup winner in a rookie year, how is that not Bedard, he's an offensive dyanmo, put him in a spot with great support and guys that can do the defensive/board work, etc. and in a world where the best players don't go to the worst team, he could help someone win a Cup in a perfect situation as good, if not better than Faber right now.

You don't believe Faber would be a 1D on Carolina?
 
This is a "Knies is a top 10 power forward in the NHL" as he was signing following the end of his college season level of opinion again. He is not a top 10 defenseman in the NHL his rookie year. You can't start projecting future onto the present if you are holding Bedard to a much more stringent standard.
Why not? He's been excellent. 7th in TOI, top 20 in D scoring while being a shutdown guy.
 
Last edited:
You don't believe Faber would be a 1D on Carolina?
Not to the same capacity, he wouldn't play PP1 over Burns for instance. Likely wouldn't play PP2 either which started with DeAngelo and has had Skjei, who is 1st in terms of PPP/60 amongst all Defensemen with 50+ powerplay minutes on the season (Faber is 37/79).
 
What do you mean "why not"? He just isn't. Look at the standard of Active Number 1 Stanley Cup winning defensemen - Hedman, Makar, Pietrangelo.. that's the tier to be at. Faber isn't at that level as a rookie.
Has there ever been a rookie #1D on a Cup winning team?

Faber is playing those minutes out of lack of other options for the Wild. He would not be getting 26 mins a night on a Cup contender.
 
I’d argue that most fans and GMs of contending teams would rather add Bedard than Faber for a playoff run.
100%. Bedard on a playoff team would have 15 more points than he does now, at minimum, and if he stayed healthy would be in the 70-80pts on a playoff team.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Pez68
Also to add that if one was looking at how either would do on a real cup contender, ideally they are both 2nd line. A little unrealistic to expect either to be able to carry a contender.

It's a silly premise anyways, and has no impact on how Calder votes go.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mrfenn92
The 2016-17 Pens won with Brian Dumoulin and Justin Schultz as their top defenseman. 2005-06 Hurricanes it was Bret Hedican.

I also don't see him being very far behind Pietrangelo, if at all. Faber has arguably been a top 10 defenseman in the league this year, that's plenty good enough to be a 1D on a cup contender.

ur citing anomalies ; not the norm
 
Bumping this due to the Article below today, lots of really good quotes from league insiders on both Bedard and Faber in here (sorry fans of the other strong rookies.)

Voters put a gigantic emphasis on points. They don't really think about anything else.

But as this article highlights, there's a very real argument that Faber has been the more impactful rookie.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad