Obvious Fabertism
Registered User
You have stumbled onto the main point from several posters here, 3 extra years of professional development is a very big gap to overcome when it comes to overall play and proficiency. Posters in this topic were acting like that gap never existed and it was appalling to suggest he has adjustments to make. Connor Bedard is expected to be a much better player three years from now, he is starting from a very high point now on the offensive side of play. No other rookie has his pure offensive acumen, but several do have significantly better attributes when it comes to other aspects of hockey. How you weight those aspects is the difference and where discussion can be had.I know I'm beating a dead horse on this - but here comes another whack ...
As a Hawks fan who also follows the AHL affiliate Rockford Icehogs - Rossi has been a burr under our saddle for a couple years playing for the Iowa Wild. He may have had some challenges over the previous 3 seasons but he gained a lot of professional experience playing against other professionals while Bedard was playing against teenagers who will never play professional hockey.
Again - I understand and agree that age should not disqualify eligibility for the Calder but a guy like Rossi who is 3 years older and has 3 years more experience is a significant factor in his ability to compete for the Calder.