Empoleon8771
Registered User
I've already made this point, but the confusing part to me about the whole Pickett dialogue is that it seems like all 3 of these are true to some people:
1. Pickett wasn't that good when he was drafted, where his upside was never higher than a systems QB
2. The team is an absolute mess offensively due to Canada, the OL, running game and whatever else you want to criticize about the OL
3. Pickett sucks because he can't make this offense work and can't put up good numbers in this offense.
I personally agree with 1 and 2, I think Pickett was more of a 2nd round caliber talent that only has the upside of a game manager starting QB. But I fundamentally don't know how you can come to conclusion 3 while agreeing with 1 and 2. He can't carry a dysfunctional offense, but he was never projected to be good enough to do that in the first place. Let alone in his 2nd year in the NFL. He's a system QB that's not good enough to carry an offense, what were you expecting out of him in the role he was put in?
If you want to say "Pickett sucks as a QB who needs to carry his offense", I can agree with that. But I also had no expectations that he'd ever become that good in the first place, and frankly most QBs in the NFL would suck according to those guidelines. I just don't understand how people can so confidently say he sucks when he's being asked to do something that I think most even pro-Pickett people don't think he's capable of doing.
I think you can easily make conclusions like "he's not good enough to be the main weapon of an offense" or "he's not good enough to win a superbowl with" based on what we've seen. But people go far beyond that and act like he's not even a starting caliber QB or shouldn't be playing in the NFL, which is unreasonable considering the situation he has been put in. He has been put in a position to fail by this organization.
1. Pickett wasn't that good when he was drafted, where his upside was never higher than a systems QB
2. The team is an absolute mess offensively due to Canada, the OL, running game and whatever else you want to criticize about the OL
3. Pickett sucks because he can't make this offense work and can't put up good numbers in this offense.
I personally agree with 1 and 2, I think Pickett was more of a 2nd round caliber talent that only has the upside of a game manager starting QB. But I fundamentally don't know how you can come to conclusion 3 while agreeing with 1 and 2. He can't carry a dysfunctional offense, but he was never projected to be good enough to do that in the first place. Let alone in his 2nd year in the NFL. He's a system QB that's not good enough to carry an offense, what were you expecting out of him in the role he was put in?
If you want to say "Pickett sucks as a QB who needs to carry his offense", I can agree with that. But I also had no expectations that he'd ever become that good in the first place, and frankly most QBs in the NFL would suck according to those guidelines. I just don't understand how people can so confidently say he sucks when he's being asked to do something that I think most even pro-Pickett people don't think he's capable of doing.
I think you can easily make conclusions like "he's not good enough to be the main weapon of an offense" or "he's not good enough to win a superbowl with" based on what we've seen. But people go far beyond that and act like he's not even a starting caliber QB or shouldn't be playing in the NFL, which is unreasonable considering the situation he has been put in. He has been put in a position to fail by this organization.