To me, it looks like the opposite. There's several positions that seem fatally flawed and while, yes, that does mean you can fill any of them with high picks, that's because you wish you had the capital to fill all of them,
And the one place I'd be opposed to picking a guy is QB. Not because I firmly believe in Pickett, but because I firmly believe the team's talent holes make this a developmental nightmare, and I don't see the point of proving that with another guy considering the talent that will be available where the team is picking.
Just in a vacuum -
Yeah, we have DTs. Not a big fan of them. The best without Cam are Benton - who may or may not be a future piece, lil early to say - and Ogunjobi, whose injury history and age worries me. Given how long DTs often take to come online, I would - again, in a vacuum - be very happy to see them take a guy who can substantially upgrade the depth while offering a better succession plan to Heyward and Ogunjobi.
Outside of a vacuum... OT seems screamingly obvious given how the OL has struggled and brought everyone down. Hell, I'd do C too if there was one worth it there. And given how I want a better environment for the QB, I guess I'd mark it as more important than CB or DT. But boy could we use all of them.