CheckingLineCenter
Registered User
- Aug 10, 2018
- 9,602
- 10,559
I think they’ve set it up during FA where they can say all of the following is true:Re the OT stuff -
I can't remember how things went when they tried Chuks at LT. Before I paid attention really. I know some people said it went about as bad as Moore at RT. But, whatever happened, switching ain't easy once you build habits, and it's not like Okorafor is hugely better than Moore. I really wouldn't be surprised if Moore won a battle between the two of them.
But then I've always got the feeling the team like Moore than most fans. Ben's latest podcast talked about how he liked Moore and thought the team did too. They're clearly doing their research on potential replacements in the draft - the OL coach was at Skoronski's pro day, Tomlin took most of OSU's offensive line for dinner - but I dunno they feel the same fervor that this place does.
I'd point out that Moore had no penalties called in the final four games of the season and while I dunno how many of the four sacks were him, he did keep Garrett fairly quiet and the big "oh crap" moments they stick in the Ravens highlights came from the right side. For better or for worse, that final stretch saved a few people from the chopping block, and I really wouldn't be surprised if Moore was one of them.
1) the OL should be better, hopefully overall, but at least on the interior
2) Moore has all the tools, is still young and has picked up experience: now he will have a much better guard to his right (especially in pass pro) which should help his game in theory.
3) a LT draft pick is walking into the perfect situation to be developed. Not a ton of pressure to start, competition, and solid veteran starters if they do get pressed into action. Same could be said for a C draft pick.