BondraTime
Registered User
They are the favorites, but they have to make the Cup final AND re-sign Karlsson. Not 1 or the other, but both.You don't think they are the favourites in the west?
They are the favorites, but they have to make the Cup final AND re-sign Karlsson. Not 1 or the other, but both.You don't think they are the favourites in the west?
Ugh, yep.What was it that Jim Nill said after snatching Spezza for nothing? 'They targeted the right guys from us'? Something like that.
Déjà vu.
I think Nash is still betterYou don't think they are the favourites in the west?
You don't think they are the favourites in the west?
You don't think they are the favourites in the west?
I think Nash is still better
Close call with Winni
It's not easy to make the cup final even if a team is a contender. Look at Tampa last year missing out in the East. They were a power house, and they didn't make it through. Pittsburgh didn't make it through either. Nashville and Winnipeg were exceptional and failed to make the cup final in the West.
Not to mention, the NHL's format makes it harder for the best teams to go farther. The 2nd and 3rd best team in the conference can end up facing off against each other in the first round depending on how things shake out in the standings.
So, what are the odds that the SJS both sign Karlsson, and beat out Winnipeg, Nashville, Vegas, or St.Louis to make the cup final? That's not even accounting for secondary teams like Chicago, Colorado, Anaheim, Dallas, or Edmonton. All of which could make some noise under the right conditions.
Realistically, we should have gotten a 1st round pick if Karlsson re-signs, not a 2nd, and not a 1st if they make the cup final. That's the worst part of the trade for me, because I can listen to guys like Bob McKenzie tell me how soft offers were for Karl as a rental and maybe justify to myself that if we were going to trade Karlsson, this is where the market was at for a year of him. But I can't imagine how the difference between 1 year of Karlsson and 8-9 years of Karlsson is only a future 2nd round pick.
Dude, it's a retool. None of those guys were in the long term plans. There is not a fan out there who wanted to hold on to P9 as one of our core, Methot was picked in an expansion draft, and Turris was about commend a lot more money and term than he was worth. Hoffman's situation leading to MB should not be part of this really, but getting a solid middle six player back over some lame picks is better in my mind.
The truth is that Duchene is so much better than Turris, Gaborik isn't really on the team and has little to do with our future plans, and we have a bunch of young kids looking to crack the roster spots left by the injury prone Method (who most loved) and a slowing P9 (that most wanted dumped at all costs).
As a team looking at the future we are so much better situated than you are prepared to give credit for. Not having a first next year is fine when you consider that we have a real living #1 centre instead. As long as we can sign our big three we have a pretty sweet up and coming line up to join our pretty special top three players.
It's not a rebuild, we're not picking last net year, it's a retool, and we have some awesome young players coming on board.
I understand anything can happen. I just wasn't sure what you meant when you said "statistical longshot". It made it sound like San Jose wasn't really viewed as a threat.
But in the prism of "anything can happen in the playoffs" then yes there's definitely many hundreds of different scenarios that could unfold.
Obviously we weren't privy to the negotiations but I don't see a lot of deals with a conditional first if the guy signs, especially when that deal is done in the preseason and the pick is for the following year without lottery protection.
SureIt's not even entirely about being the best. The best teams don't always make it the deepest in the playoffs. We should know that because we certainly weren't the 2nd best team in the East in the 16-17 season, yet we made it to a goal away from the Cup final. There's a lot of luck involved, getting the right match ups, guys either staying or not staying healthy.
There's just so many exceptional teams as well, so it's very difficult to point at one team and say "they'll be in the Cup final".
"Anything can happen" isn't the central point of my argument. When you say 100s of scenarios can fold out, it sounds to me like you are trying to ignore what I actually wrote and frame my points and argument as being absurd.
If that wasn't you're intention, it is what it is, but that's how it comes across.
People keep saying how good of a scout Dorion is but I'm extremely sceptical.
The dude made his fame from Karlsson and our other Swedish picks but he isn't really the one who picked up on them.
It was our Swedish scout who convinced Dorion, who in turn convinced Murray. Dorion was just the middle man.
Anyway you'd think that SOME, no matter how miniscule, ability he had of scouting would translate to pro scouting. But no, Dorion has shown fundamental inability to Target good players. The Burrows trade? Jeesus ****, you didn't need to be a pro scout to know that Burrows was done.
Instead not only does Dorion give up a top prospect he also was the only one in the market for Burrows because he was the only one willing to give him 2.5 million to float.
DORION IS NOT A GOOD SCOUT. DORION DOES NOT UNDERSTAND HOCKEY.
Prove to me otherwise.
@swiftwin
--July 2007 - Dorion was hired as chief amateur scout---
2008 1st round (15th overall) - Erik Karlsson
2009 5th round (130th overall) - Mike Hoffman
2010 6th round (178th overall) - Mark Stone
2011 7th round (204th overall) - Ryan Dzingel
Find me a team that has done better with late picks in as short of a period of time at Dorion did after he got hired.
Yeah, played a big part in our great drafting.Pretty much this.
Dorion is allowed to be a terrible GM and a great amateur scout at the same time. His work as an awful GM doesn't invalidate his work before he was given the big job.
Pretty much this.
Dorion is allowed to be a terrible GM and a great amateur scout at the same time. His work as an awful GM doesn't invalidate his work before he was given the big job.
Sorry guys just came by for the schadenfreude. We have one of these defend the organization above all else guys too. The must go to the same dealer or something.
Exactly. Not only that, but you can't simultaneously refuse to praise him for the draft picks because "he wasn't actually scouting, he was just managing the scouts", and give him **** for the trades as GM even though he wasn't the pro scout. That's a deranged double standard.
Do you really think that GMs don't watch NHL players that they are trading for?
Just saw this on reddit.
Damn, dorion. close your mouth.
Edit: click on the link. people are speculating that dorion was behind that burner account that used to support the sens.
woooooosh
Karlsson was Forsberg's pick and Stone was Lowes' pick.--July 2007 - Dorion was hired as chief amateur scout---
2008 1st round (15th overall) - Erik Karlsson
2009 5th round (130th overall) - Mike Hoffman
2010 6th round (178th overall) - Mark Stone
2011 7th round (204th overall) - Ryan Dzingel
Find me a team that has done better with late picks in as short of a period of time at Dorion did after he got hired. I'm not sure what your vendetta is, and why you're trying to revise history.