Woodman19
Registered User
- Jun 14, 2008
- 18,691
- 2,253
Okay I slept on it, I am okay with Ohtani + Soto for the offseason additions.
I mean, yeah, I guess that would be fine.Okay I slept on it, I am okay with Ohtani + Soto for the offseason additions.
Meh. Not that I think the Jays will ultimately get either, but people said the same things about Ryu and Springer before those happened.There’s a 1% chance we land Ohtani or Soto. We are being used in these talks.
I feel like Shapiro has shattered the whole "FA won't come to Toronto" thing since we have actually landed top FA the last few years in:Meh. Not that I think the Jays will ultimately get either, but people said the same things about Ryu and Springer before those happened.
I get that Ohtani is different because he'll be a number of magnitudes more expensive than those guys, but Soto isn't even a free agent, and management has shown a willingness to trade their top prospects to bring in guys they want.
Meh. Not that I think the Jays will ultimately get either, but people said the same things about Ryu and Springer before those happened.
I get that Ohtani is different because he'll be a number of magnitudes more expensive than those guys, but Soto isn't even a free agent, and management has shown a willingness to trade their top prospects to bring in guys they want.
Yes we do and I think Tiedeman is not included for someone only under control for one more year. No one else is going to offer up an asset like that.Would we even have what it takes to get Soto? Obviously tiedeman is included in that trade
Yeah, the only way Tiedemann is involved in a deal like that is if it's expanded to include a longer-term piece or two to the Jays.Yes we do and I think Tiedeman is not included for someone only under control for one more year. No one else is going to offer up an asset like that.
I see where you're coming from.Sure and that would be nice but in the end I want to see a championship. I dont care much for individual performances.
I’m old enough to remember the previous 2 but I’d like to see one as an adult. Because in the end I’d rather be talking about something like Carter walking off the Phillies then the time I saw a guy pitch and hit.
I’m not taking Soto unless he’s extended hence why I said Tiedeman included.Yes we do and I think Tiedeman is not included for someone only under control for one more year. No one else is going to offer up an asset like that.
I understand what you are saying, but it is far rarer to see what Ohtani is doing than to see a Championship.Sure and that would be nice but in the end I want to see a championship. I dont care much for individual performances.
I’m old enough to remember the previous 2 but I’d like to see one as an adult. Because in the end I’d rather be talking about something like Carter walking off the Phillies then the time I saw a guy pitch and hit.
Soto is a trade. If they paid the price, they could land him.There’s a 1% chance we land Ohtani or Soto. We are being used in these talks.
I’m not taking Soto unless he’s extended hence why I said Tiedeman included.
Right so back to my main conclusion. He won't be a Blue Jay.Boras client so he's not getting extended. Highly doubt Tiedemann would be involved and if they're focused around controllable pitching then Manoah starts to look pretty enticing. I wouldn't even be opposed to adding but in terms of prospects Tiedemann's the only guy off the table IMO.
Do you think he stays with the Padres? Because that same logic would apply to every team.Right so back to my main conclusion. He won't be a Blue Jay.
Right so back to my main conclusion. He won't be a Blue Jay.
Sometimes it's more preferable to buy a premium asset for the one year to alleviate the risk a long term brings. I don't understand this idea that everyone you acquire has to be extended.Why's that? I think management knows they're at a critical point where they need to add significant pieces to remain competitive with the current core, and whenever you have the opportunity to add a top 5 hitter (contract year or not) you try to make that happen. Plus they're not opposed to acquiring Boras clients even though that essentially means zero chance of extension.
Sometimes it's more preferable to buy a premium asset for the one year to alleviate the risk a long term brings. I don't understand this idea that everyone you acquire has to be extended.
Agreed 110%Yes exactly. For example I’d be more in favour of acquiring him than signing Bellinger.