Completely agree but from what im reading and seeing its not about how bad he is in other aspects of the game but more about his lack of effort or desire to be better than just his shot. You can have the greatest teachers but if youre not willing to learn or cant pay attention, you wont get any better. Not sure whats going on in his head but if he can flip that switch then ya he'd be a gamebreaker for sure.
My preference is to take Demidov and with Adam Nicholas and our development team, turn him into Fullidov
all very fair points... though I wonder how much of his issues are from a lack of competition vs an outright bad attitude?
i haven't read anything suggesting he's uncoachable or problematic off-ice, moreso that he tends to float a bit and doesn't show consistent engagement/effort. Not ideal, but unrealized prospect pathways are littered with guys that had complete games/high compete levels who didn't have the skill to translate it to regular NHL roles.
With our development team and organization culture firmly in place, I'd be fine with us taking a shot on a kid that needs to mature a bit to make the most of his immense skill. The compete-level of our young core is very solid, and i'd trust in the culture steering him the right way... especially with CC/Hutson as high-effort/high-work ethic team USA guys already in place.
Eiserman or Demidov seem like the highest ceiling/elite talents that might fall to us with a top 5-7 pick, if either of them do, i hope we snag one. (then, leverage some draft collateral or LD depth to move into a pick in the teens to get Iginla... a lower ceiling/more complete forward to add to our org depth.