Then whats your point? You want a coach that makes a roster better than it actually is? Beat teams that they shouldnt? Good luck with that.
No.
You might want to read that again. Slowly, this time. I think last year's team played to just about where they should've finished. If anything, I think the '11-12 team overachieved.
Either way, you're implying they played up to their potential. Which they did not, I know, it's a lot easier to say the team sucks than admit that they underachieved. Which is on both the players and the coach, the '11-'12 team probably overachieved to an extent but for the most part they played up to their potential.
In some ways, yes. If someone told you at the start of the season that:
- Marian Gaborik would be traded at the deadline (partly for depth and partly because he wasn't producing)
- Marc Staal would miss 27 games and only play one game in the playoffs
- Brad Richards play would relegate him to the 4th line (and be benched for two games in the playoffs)
- Chris Kreider would score 3 points in the regular season
- They would get a total of 10 goals and 18 points for Boyle, Pyatt, Powe and Asham
- The likes of Christian Thomas, Benn Ferriero, Brandon Mashinter, Kris Newbury, JT Miller, Brandon Segal, Matt Gilroy, Stu Bickel, Roman Hamrlik, Josh Halpern and Michael Haley would combine for over 60 games played and contribute a total of 7 points
- That Derek Stepan would lead the team in scoring
- That Rick Nash would have as many goals as he did assists
- That Anton Stralman would have more goals than Michael Del Zotto
Would you think that this team would make it to the second round of the playoffs?
Bolded indicates the underachievers. Boyle, Pyatt, Powe and Asham, if they score a career average in goals gets you another 15 or so (short season half that), Richards obviously had his head up his ass, Del Zotto struggled, McDonagh, Girardi, Callahan, Hagelin all had stretches where they didn't play very good hockey.
Second round? Yes, they started to click towards the end, and actually play up to their potential (never reached it). They got beat by a better team in the 2nd round, absolutely. Had everyone been healthy and performing at their potential who knows? Probably still lose that round, Boston started clicking at the right time and were a very good team for 2.5 rounds of the playoffs, then hardly showed up for the finals.
The point is that last years team certainly wasn't great, and I do believe we're in a better position now, but they also weren't the worst roster ever put together, a lot of the issues had to do with the team not playing how they are capable of playing, and a lot of that had to do with the fact that the players stopped responding to the coach, whose job it is to get his players to play at their potential. They stop listening to you when you scream and call them names? Change your approach and try to get their respect back, or lose your job. Easy choice for most people, admirable trait of Torts is that he doesn't back down from who he is and believes it's the "right way" I respect him, but it's also his Achilles heel.