DMen are funny things. Often second round picks, or fifth round picks end up being fabulous d-men. Even mid to late first rounders. I'm happy having picked Amirov where we did. I don't wish that we'd moved back and grabbed a Guhle, or a Schneider... but I do wish we had some of those guys in the system. It's hard to flaw the picks we've made this year, they've been some fantastic value, and have mostly had very good years. You think about Hirvonen and Niemala and the years, and World Juniors that they had... Miettenen has had a great year. Some will work out, some won't... same with Guhle and Schneider... they might be better than expected, about as expected or worse at the NHL level.
We go around in circles about a diversified prospect pool, and we get the.. .you don't draft for size... and of course you don't.. but maybe once in a while, if your ratings are real close on two prospects, and you have an abundance of small skill, you take the size, where the ratings are near equal.
Funny enough, we traded for Andersen, and the picks we traded ended up being Sam Steel, and Max Comtois. Comtois is EXACTLY the type of player we could use in our top six right now. A skilled LW, with size on a ELC. Look trading for Andersen was the right thing to do, no question about that, so I'm not saying it was a mistake. But you can't trade for a Comtois now, without a massive overpayment, where he was a second round pick, with size. Surely Dubas and co. are skilled enough to identify such players, who are underrated, but also have size.