Oh, enough with the "he's too good for juniors" nonsense. Q followers to an individual disagree with that position. In any event, plenty of better players return to their respective junior league without pulling this stunt.
Oh, enough with the "he's too good for juniors" nonsense. Q followers to an individual disagree with that position. In any event, plenty of better players return to their respective junior league without pulling this stunt.
As an ancillary point, when did Ted Nolan become a paragon of player management?
If the paperwork has gone through, it CANNOT be done.
Because he was sent down to Quebec after October 1st, his ONLY option is to play in Quebec until the Remparts' season is over.
There's no "recall". There's no "do-over". There's no "delete transaction".
If the paperwork is done, the only place Grigo can play right now is Quebec.
On the other hand, I don't think Murray will throw away an asset to make a point. I think he will try to find a way it can be worked out so neither side loses face.I don't think Tim Murray seems like a guy thy is going to stand for a player refusing to do what is asked of him. I think if Grigo continues to cause a problem, then Murray is just going to move on from him, whether that be via trade or some other method, IMO. Murray strikes me as a guy who is going to deal with player transactions using only his brain, not his heart. He has no emotional attachment to Grigo, obviously. He's all business, and that doesn't bode very well for Grigorenkos future here.
As a side note, I really hope Grigorenko works out here. I don't want him ending up somewhere else and having success there.
One other note, the Rampart's regular season ends on March 15th.
What should be done is for Murray to sit down with him. Tell him to finish the season in the Q, it's just 2 months. Then come March the trade deadline should open up a roster spot or two. Give him a dozen games until early Apr and send him down to the Amerks for playoffs. He gets playing time and some more NHL money.
Exactly, it's not like he'll be homeless during those 2 months. In my opinion he should've just accepted it and worked hard in order to prove how valuable he is.Seriously. It's TWO months. If what he said in his fb post is true about growing up sooo poor then he'll survive.
So what I'm not sure about is how to fix that. I don't want to necessarily break his confidence because ehe needs that to be successful. Say the Sabres decide to play him 15m in every game for the rest of the season, and he puts up 4g 6a in 40 games. I've played in a men's rec hockey league that was way above my skill level, and being outclassed by people stronger/better every single game really kills your desire.
Has anyone asked what if that actually is his highest gear? Part of this might be amplified by being drafted so close to Girgensons who's on the other side of the spectrum.
Just wondering how he would be received in the Sabres locker room if management did buckle (which they won't) by his teammates.
I would imagine not all that well.
Girgs and Grigs couldn't be farther from each other in terms of work ethic. How do you fix it? Man, idk. Force Grigs to room with girgs when he's back up with the sabres? I'm not sure if there is a way to fix it other than growing up.
Put him on a line with zemgus and ott.
Not sure what this accomplishes for Grigorenko.
No, if they wanted his contract off the books for free, they could easily have traded him for peanuts and not suffer the embarrassment.Can the Sabres walk away from their contract with Grigorenko if he refuses to report to the junior team in Quebec? If so, might this be precisely what they had hoped for?
You think he'd up his game?
Most likely he would float and make them go into the corners. I'd probly do that myself thinking they're better off in the corners and hitting, etc than me anyways.