The LWMD - Discussion Thread Part VI

[DL44]

Draft thread title is in need of an update fyi

Just enjoy your name in lights for a lil longer

 

[VanillaCoke]

Just enjoy your name in lights for a lil longer

True, I should screen shot that and make an avatar

 

[Bam19]

Buffaloes 11 rounder is available looking to move back

 

[DL44]

A nice tight 5 pick morning (assuming K2B is still around)... not bad...

 

[Ainec]

I really like the Klefbom pick, your team is looking good K2B

 

[Ainec]

At this rate my pick will be OTC tonight. It's 6 picks away if anyone is interested in it PM me.

25. New Jersey - Lord of Light (from CHI/CBJ) FT

 

[DL44]

A nice tight 5 pick morning (assuming K2B is still around)... not bad...

At this rate my pick will be OTC tonight. It's 6 picks away if anyone is interested in it PM me.

25. New Jersey - Lord of Light (from CHI/CBJ) FT

jinx it..

 

[VanillaCoke]

Seidenberg over a 2 LW....

Wingers are getting scarce

 

[CRDragon]

Seidenberg over a 2 LW....

Wingers are getting scarce

Completed top 4 D or completed top 6 F?

It's a toss and a matter of preference imo.

 

[VanillaCoke]

Seems to be more d left than wingers imo

 

[Intangibos]

Hm Klefbom was on my radar for my next series of picks

 

[Ainec]

Seidenberg over a 2 LW....

Wingers are getting scarce

No they are not.

Top 4 D > 1 W spot although I personally don't like Seidenberg as a top 4


I sent a pm to ThereGoesVirtanen if K2B wasn't able to
edit: oops should've been canucker

 

[CRDragon]

I picked him because he can score from center ice.

You goalies beware!

 

[VanillaCoke]

No they are not.

Top 4 D > 1 W spot although I personally don't like Seidenberg as a top 4


I sent a pm to ThereGoesVirtanen if K2B wasn't able to

I don't know what your first line is about.
But my point was I'd rather fill out the 2nd line than get seidenberg. Maybe I'm just not that high on him. But wingers are nearly gone. I've got a few D I'd rather have

 

[Ainec]

I don't know what your first line is about.
But my point was I'd rather fill out the 2nd line than get seidenberg. Maybe I'm just not that high on him. But wingers are nearly gone. I've got a few D I'd rather have

was about your scarcity comment

and no they're not nearly gone and yes I'd rather have a few D over Sieds but we have our own rankings

he went for a completed top 4 D I think that's the right call

 

[VanillaCoke]

There's plenty of 3 liners left. 2nd line left wingers are scarce

 

[Ainec]

Nope

 

[VanillaCoke]

Yep..

 

[VanillaCoke]

Theres literally zero 40+ point LWs left, and 5/6 30 pointers.
I personally dont think ~30 points is good 2nd line production.

Edit. Therefore 6 borderline 2nd left wingers, probably better suited to 3rd liners woukd be considered scarce to me.

 

[Bam19]

Theres literally zero 40+ point LWs left, and 5/6 30 pointers.
I personally dont think ~30 points is good 2nd line production.

Edit. Therefore 6 borderline 2nd left wingers, probably better suited to 3rd liners woukd be considered scarce to me.

Yeah I'm real glad my top 6 is filled (plus my 3c who is a legit second liner)

 

[VanillaCoke]

Yeah I'm real glad my top 6 is filled (plus my 3c who is a legit second liner)

Yeah I agree, and same here.
Your team is looking good and your defense didn't suffer from filling out top 6 either like mine did.
Only jones I'm not too high on but the great goalies went early

 

[StrictlyCommercial]

There's a lot more W's left than you guys seem to think. I've got binders of W's.

 

[Ainec]

Yeah there are a lot of Ws available

it's not an issue. Just cause you have your top 3 lines filled out already doesn't mean we need to get on it

 

[Baby Pettersson]

You guys all complaining about 3rd liners. I still need a 1st liner LW!

 

[VanillaCoke]

Yeah there are a lot of Ws available

it's not an issue. Just cause you have your top 3 lines filled out already doesn't mean we need to get on it

There's a lot more W's left than you guys seem to think. I've got binders of W's.

Legitimate 2nd line Left wingers to be accurate was the discussion