Are people still lamenting over Broberg gone? Guy didn't want to be here. He might be playing well for the Blues [remains to be seen if itll hold up] but at the end of the day, if he wanted to move on from Edmonton as speculated back in January, nothing was ever gonna change that unless Holland was trading Kulak/Nurse...which clearly he didn't want to
It's an easy thread to avoid. This is a history making situation that's being analyzed extensively for the impact it carries for two franchises and prospective the way the league's management and labour pool do business in the future.
At the heart of it is how does this happen for an organization with significant, obvious risk factors including frayed relationship, limited cap dollars, double indemnity with two pedigree RFA's, and an economic growth market with first real bump of $5 million available for teams to spend. The Oilers high risk situation was much discussed in media circles, apparently noted internally, and at least one GM on public record (the poacher himself) in June advised that offer sheets could be on the table to improve his team's situation. The Oilers summer plans can be defined as pre-August 12 and reactive August 12 scrambled contingency plan that's left a Stanley Cup Finalist roster worse off and with significant question marks at a difficult, marquee position to fill.
It's legitimate question alot of people are asking in how, all risk factors considered, can an organization that's had trouble developing prospects and now preaching development under its leadership group slip into inaction for well over a month and enable the market to set new valuations on its NHL ready talent expected to be roster contributors in immediate term and likely longer term (and/or at minimum quality assets utilized like the McLeod trade to offload cap space to build future quality prospect pool depth of a very meagre pipeline). On top of the questions is how a management group led by a former super agent well versed in leveraging CBA vehicles and who actually worked with the agent with the deteriorated relationship with his team did not act to mitigate and get ahead of the substantive risks.
Lots of reasons to discuss this precedent setting situation. Not to mention the Oilers still have to substantively improve the Cup window blueline with the reactive course imposed on them with August 12th's market re-valuation of Broberg and Holloway.
It's reasonable to question and discuss the 'new' management's decision making and choices in a situation with significant friction going back to November and a free falling team and its coaching staff left the young player in limbo. Just like Oiler fans discuss consequential decisions like signing Jack Campbell or Lucic; trading pedigree draft assets for Reinhart; on and on.
In this league quality defensemen are a coveted asset often requiring draft and development to secure them. Or costly to acquire by trade. The Oilers gave up their hard miles developed one after a quality support Stanley Cup Final run for the cost of a secondary draft pick. So is this old Oilers management bad decisions repeating themselves yet again or will this management group dig itself out of the situation of their making with a big trade that helps the Oilers return to the Cup Final and win it. Big inflection point in this franchise's time.