Channelcat
Mennonite
Yes, he played a smart simple game. I was impressedJMO was good.
Hopefully he can keep it up.
Jets don't need him to be offensive dynamo.
Just get the puck to the forwards and let them work their magic.
Yes, he played a smart simple game. I was impressedJMO was good.
Hopefully he can keep it up.
Jets don't need him to be offensive dynamo.
Just get the puck to the forwards and let them work their magic.
In days gone by a pigeon was a sucker. The type of guy that if he didn’t show up for the Saturday night poker game you cancelled the game.I think it was "pidge", as in pigeon. Apparently, players call each other this all the time. News to me until this morning.
Because Laine was in the box, and had to wait for a whistle.Iirc it wasn’t until 5 mins+ into the third period when the second line had their first shift, so for some reason they skipped one of their shifts.
I thought they were benched for a while. So that’s probably why the ice time is what it was.
They don’t exactly create real good chances, as neither of them is a good playmaker. Well, Copp can do somehow occasionally respectable playmaking, but he isn’t great with it for sure, and unfortunately Lowry is an awful playmaker and passer, so he especially isn’t creating much of anything. But they both are excellent in keeping the play at the opponent’s end, even though it doesn’t lead into much of anything else.I'd like to see Vesalainen playing with Copp and Lowry, maybe he could finish some of the chances they create
C> Play him with reasonable minutes, but give the clearly hot players at least as much ice time or preferably even a bit more.QQ: For a player who is critically important to the Jets success, who is historically a slow starter, is a point per game player and the captain of our team, how do you think you get him going?
A> Don't give him minutes
B> Give him minutes and allow him to build his confidence and get his timing back
They don’t exactly create real good chances, as neither of them is a good playmaker. Well, Copp can do somehow occasionally reapectable playmaking, but he isn’t great with it for sure, and unfortunately Lowry is an awful playmaker and passer, so he especially isn’t creating much of anything. But they both are excellent in keeping the play at the opponent end, even though it doesn’t lead into much of anything else. This anyway is a very useful thing for many situations, so I’m not saying that they aren’t valuable players. But putting someone in their line in the hope of him getting good scoring chances because of them, is honestly unrealistic daydreaming. Any line that Lowry plays at, can forget about creating real good scoring chances. He has unfortunately abysmal playmaking skills for the NHL level.
Not a bad record, looking backwards. Does that mean you think we should keep starting Wheeler on 3x3 going forward?The objective of overtime is to score / win.
Since 2017/18, the Jets have the 6th best OT/SO record in the NHL. (TB is in a class of their own).
View attachment 384539
I'd definitely like to see DeMelo with Josh, I think the jury is out on Beaulieu. I just don't think you can win the cup with a guy who is so prone to total brain meltdowns like him. I'd much rather put Poolman with Heinola on the third pair and give Heinola some PP time.The bad first period probably skewed my view - we started cycling a lot more after that
I’m definitely not writing anyone off yet - I’d rather see Heinola with Beaulieu when the dust clears and demelo back with Jmo
Can't argue with that. I'm hoping with line two looking so effective and dangerous that will naturally bring Wheeler down to <18 minutesI think you can be critical of his play last night and still acknowledge that he will likely get better once he gets up to speed.
I also think you can be critical of the coach playing him 20 plus minutes when he's not going while the teams most dynamic player on the day got significantly less in terms of ice time.
Its not a big deal to me as its one game but I think Wheeler at age 34 is likely not able to handle as heavy of a load as in past years. I think 17 to 18 minutes is likely his sweet spot going forward and we have the winger depth that we can afford to play hi. In that minute range.
agreed. but unfortunately with those fans they can't help themselvesI don't want to single anyone or groups of fans out, but it's clear we have fans of the Jets on this forum, and fans of particular player(s). I'm a Jets fan. I want all of our players to be sucessful.
From what I've seen from Markstrom he has all of the tools to be one of the best. I think he just has the odd leaky moment. Some goalies never overcome that, but if he can limit those he could be a really good pick up for the Flames. Of course, I hope notInterestingly, I was mining for salt on the Flames subreddit (not here on HF) and they all love Markstrom. I thought he had a pretty weak game. Very much looking forward to playing him nine more times.
Man, I remember Gaudreau's first few seasons he was a sure thing in overtime.The objective of overtime is to score / win.
Since 2017/18, the Jets have the 6th best OT/SO record in the NHL. (TB is in a class of their own).
View attachment 384539
surprising the COL is the worstThe objective of overtime is to score / win.
Since 2017/18, the Jets have the 6th best OT/SO record in the NHL. (TB is in a class of their own).
View attachment 384539
Quite f’ing true!I thought Maurice calling the time-out in the second period to give our guys a chance to rest before the 5 on 3 was huge. Then he puts 5 forwards out right after the time-out and Connor scores to tie the game up . I know alot of people hate Maurice but if that was a new coach that we hired in the off season everyone would be praising the shit out of him for those moves . Good game coach.
His penalty starting the 3rd kept him in the box extra long (no whistle on a coincidental penalty) and I believe the 1st line double shifted once in there as well. So his ice time would be closer to Wheeler's, but still not near Scheifele's.So add about a minute to his ice-time, and still doesn’t look much different. Horrible compared to Scheifele’s and Wheeler’s ice times.
Markstrom was a coup for the Flames... he will carry them to top 3 finish - they just need to tie him to his crease...From what I've seen from Markstrom he has all of the tools to be one of the best. I think he just has the odd leaky moment. Some goalies never overcome that, but if he can limit those he could be a really good pick up for the Flames. Of course, I hope not
My first thought was "what a stupid timeout to take". Happy to be proven wrongI thought Maurice calling the time-out in the second period to give our guys a chance to rest before the 5 on 3 was huge. Then he puts 5 forwards out right after the time-out and Connor scores to tie the game up . I know alot of people hate Maurice but if that was a new coach that we hired in the off season everyone would be praising the shit out of him for those moves . Good game coach.
wheeler at 50% is still superior to roslovicThere has been a lot of talk about the merits of better balancing our lines. If Roslovic returns, it would be interesting to try him on Scheifele's line and move Wheeler to the third line.
Rationale:
1) Even if he improves his speed after a Wheeleresque slow start he won't keep up with Scheifele and Ehlers. Roslovic will.
2) A little less 5x5 ice time and shift length will keep Blake fresher for the PP
3) The third line needs some offensive creativity and Wheeler can provide this. I think a Copp, Lowry Wheeler combo could be potent offensively and defensively.
See where I am going here, Paul?
Both goalies had a lot of rust... Helle looked like Beauregard in the firstInterestingly, I was mining for salt on the Flames subreddit (not here on HF) and they all love Markstrom. I thought he had a pretty weak game. Very much looking forward to playing him nine more times.
It's not a contest; it's about balancing lines, finding synergies and conserving energy.wheeler at 50% is still superior to roslovic
It’s true that he after all he was in the penalty box for four minutes. But the maximum time he could have played from that is half of it or probably less than that. So ok, lets then think that without his penalties his ice time would have been a bit over 18 minutes, just like Connor had in fact. It would be looking at least a bit better, but there is still a big difference.
I think that Maurice is having endless love with Wheeler, when he gets that kind of ice-time with the kind of play he showed last night. Just as another example, Ehlers was supposedly playing on the same line with Wheeler. Still he had only a bit over 17 minutes of ice time while Wheeler had a bit over 21 minutes.
Like I said, if the 2nd line continues to play like they did last night, I can see that gap tightening up -
I don't really care what Mo has usually done - this top 6 may be a game changer - that's all I'm pointing out.