CBJWerenski8
Rest in Peace Johnny
- Jun 13, 2009
- 43,779
- 26,841
“There is a reason,” said one NHL owner, “that I’m a control freak.”
This was hours after Mike Babcock resigned as Columbus’s head coach. The McConnell family, owners of the Blue Jackets since their inception, has an excellent reputation in hockey circles. During his years at Sportsnet, Doug MacLean repeatedly said great things about working for them. That hasn’t changed, even as the leadership did.
They hired people, and allowed them to make decisions. Now, as the mushroom cloud around Columbus dissipates, it's one of the many unanswered questions: Will the McConnells change the way they oversee the Blue Jackets?
“Our ownership group is deeply frustrated and disappointed by the events of the past week,” Monday’s statement from ownership read. “We do not anticipate further changes to our hockey leadership team at this time. Additional disruptions would be detrimental to our players and coaches as they prepare for the opening of training camp in two days.”
The words “at this time,” jumped off our screens. Everyone knows what that means.
Truth is, the Blue Jackets’ front office was already on notice. That’s why they hired Babcock, gambling his hockey mind could push them into the playoff race, solidifying job security. A strong season is essential for them. Babcock’s resignation doesn’t change the need for positive results. What it might change, however, is how ownership feels about the people in charge of the organization on a personal level, and how it might need to run the team in the future.
That isn’t the only thing we’re left wondering.
GM Jarmo Kekalainen apologized to the players on Monday morning. But there are many theories about what this will mean inside the Blue Jackets’ room. We know what was said publicly, but by the time the team met with the NHLPA on Thursday, the players made it very clear there had to be change. Will that be enough to smooth over any previous comments?
I haven’t played on a professional sports team, but I have worked in highly charged workplace environments where emotional times caused cracks. There are a lot of ways it can go. Some move on quick. Others have long memories and don’t let go. You find out if you can still be a team. And, if that’s possible, group success heals a lot of wounds. A rising tide floats all boats.
Finally, I wonder about those who crave a second chance. Babcock’s situation isn’t analogous to many others, but there are plenty of players, coaches, executives, etc., who will be looking for an opportunity to right a wrong, fix a mistake, redeem themselves. Will this experience scare off people who make those hires? Scare off those who own teams? The Blue Jackets were embarrassed. No one wants to sit where Kekalainen and John Davidson did this week.