Antropovsky
Registered User
- Jun 2, 2007
- 16,136
- 8,003
Marners complaints about social media seems to suggest they do play somewhat a role in outcomes.Fans have nothing to do with it.
Marners complaints about social media seems to suggest they do play somewhat a role in outcomes.Fans have nothing to do with it.
This is incorrect. Toronto has always liked players with a heavy presence, good work ethic and battle in them. The problem is we never had enough Elite talent or the right combination with it to win.You wanted do nothing tough enforcers that would protect the team, you got Ryan Reaves.
Since when his he a big name Dman?You wanted a big name D-man, you got John Klingberg.
Bert isn't a write off yet, I suspect coaching to be a problem. Domi is lazy, but his cap is small.You wanted some snarl in the top 6, you got Max Domi and Tyler Bertuzzi.
Not really worried about this. He is dealing with pretty bare cupboards though and Dubas really left the cap in hell. I mean, what was he going to do trade Marner at the 11th hour? Shanahan blew this one above all not Tre. Tre got us Matthews signed luckily.You wanted a hockey man with lots of experience in charge of things, you got Brad Treliving who has 10 years of being a GM.
We still have nerds running things, look at Keefe. It's a disaster. Everyone else Dubas and Shanahan put in are there pretty much. Not sure what you are talking about?You were tired of the nerds running things, so now you have a team that has been caved in on expected goals this season.
No we didn't get half of what we wanted and we always said we needed to balance the cap and get better D. Maybe bolster that bottom L3 L4 C position.You got what you wanted, you just didn't know what this team needed.
Dubas didn't draft or develop this. We got a Lou draft in Woll and he seems ok so far. Just hoping he becomes great.The problem with the Leafs over the last few seasons:
1) Goaltending - We haven't really gotten a stable solution since Andersen was here. I'm a Dubas guy but he does have a big weakness when it comes to evaluating goaltenders.
Not arguing with this point but BT really was in a bind without trading Marner for cap and assets to fix this.2) Transition Defense - This is something that dates back to the Columbus series. The Leafs are a slow skating team on the back end with Morgan Rielly as the only truly fast skater so they are suseptible to counter attacking teams. This was probably most clearly shown in the Montreal series; Montreal only scored 1 goal off of a sustained forecheck that entire series, the rest of their goals came on special teams (3) and or rush attacks. Justin Bourne after that series noted that Montreal that season relied more on transition offense than any other team in the league and Toronto was one of the worst at transition defense. The Leafs countered this by playing a heavy posession offense which. This problem would pop up vs Tampa the next season and Florida the season after. Florida in our most recent series scored 80% of their goals off rush attacks and not heavy forechecking as people here think.
No argument3) Transition Offense - Basically the other side of the coin as above. This team only has two players who are truly good at transition offense - Nylander and Reilly. Most of the lines are built for heavy posession game. Not that there's anything wrong with that but you do need a balance. Teams that are too one dimensional don't go far.
None of these things were solved in the off season.
It’s 100% culture. We bring in players who have some bite and they get neutered.
Dubas left us in cap hell and yet Treliving still found room to spend $2.4 million on a 4th line center, $1.3 million on a do nothing "enforcer" plus $3 million on a guy who describe as lazy and another $4.1 million on a defenseman nobody seems to like. I don't follow your line of logic.This is incorrect. Toronto has always liked players with a heavy presence, good work ethic and battle in them. The problem is we never had enough Elite talent or the right combination with it to win.
Since when his he a big name Dman?
Bert isn't a write off yet, I suspect coaching to be a problem. Domi is lazy, but his cap is small.
Not really worried about this. He is dealing with pretty bare cupboards though and Dubas really left the cap in hell. I mean, what was he going to do trade Marner at the 11th hour? Shanahan blew this one above all not Tre. Tre got us Matthews signed luckily.
We still have nerds running things, look at Keefe. It's a disaster. Everyone else Dubas and Shanahan put in are there pretty much. Not sure what you are talking about?
No we didn't get half of what we wanted and we always said we needed to balance the cap and get better D. Maybe bolster that bottom L3 L4 C position.
Dubas didn't draft or develop this. We got a Lou draft in Woll and he seems ok so far. Just hoping he becomes great.
Not arguing with this point but BT really was in a bind without trading Marner for cap and assets to fix this.
No argument
Dubas left us in cap hell and yet Treliving still found room to spend $2.4 million on a 4th line center, $1.3 million on a do nothing "enforcer" plus $3 million on a guy who describe as lazy and another $4.1 million on a defenseman nobody seems to like. I don't follow your line of logic.
Dubas put us in cap hell .Don't you...forget about me...don't, don't, don't...
It’s 100% culture. We bring in players who have some bite and they get neutered.
TLDR but I haven't been clamouring for years for a team full of wimps who only try when they feel like it.You wanted do nothing tough enforcers that would protect the team, you got Ryan Reaves.
You wanted a big name D-man, you got John Klingberg.
You wanted some snarl in the top 6, you got Max Domi and Tyler Bertuzzi.
You wanted a hockey man with lots of experience in charge of things, you got Brad Treliving who has 10 years of being a GM.
You were tired of the nerds running things, so now you have a team that has been caved in on expected goals this season.
You got what you wanted, you just didn't know what this team needed.
The problem with the Leafs over the last few seasons:
1) Goaltending - We haven't really gotten a stable solution since Andersen was here. I'm a Dubas guy but he does have a big weakness when it comes to evaluating goaltenders.
2) Transition Defense - This is something that dates back to the Columbus series. The Leafs are a slow skating team on the back end with Morgan Rielly as the only truly fast skater so they are suseptible to counter attacking teams. This was probably most clearly shown in the Montreal series; Montreal only scored 1 goal off of a sustained forecheck that entire series, the rest of their goals came on special teams (3) and or rush attacks. Justin Bourne after that series noted that Montreal that season relied more on transition offense than any other team in the league and Toronto was one of the worst at transition defense. The Leafs countered this by playing a heavy posession offense which. This problem would pop up vs Tampa the next season and Florida the season after. Florida in our most recent series scored 80% of their goals off rush attacks and not heavy forechecking as people here think.
3) Transition Offense - Basically the other side of the coin as above. This team only has two players who are truly good at transition offense - Nylander and Reilly. Most of the lines are built for heavy posession game. Not that there's anything wrong with that but you do need a balance. Teams that are too one dimensional don't go far.
None of these things were solved in the off season.
Two questions.
What's a 'monkey paw' ?
Is every thread going to be turned into Dubas worship this season?
It was always a culture thing.It's starting to seem like a culture thing to me.
Was it ever 'relevant'?In about 10 games this thread will be as relevant as the overreaction thread.
The fans want good players with snarl, good defencemen, a Reaves type in their prime, sort of that Tampa model with a balanced roster with a couple of super stars surrounded by good players that fit in their role.