The Winter Soldier
Registered User
- Apr 4, 2011
- 71,029
- 21,381
Here's my take on the game, being there live. Did the Leafs control more of the game than NJ? Sure, but it still wouldn't have made a difference. The Devils had speed, skill and aggressiveness that overwhelmed the Leafs at times and forced mistakes. They've done that in their previous 2 games as well. They don't need sustained pressure in the opposing team's zone and a barrage of shots to score. As for the leafs 50 shots, the majority were of low quality from what I and everyone in my section saw. I overheard leaf fans complain that most of the shots were right at Schneider and from bad angles.
Leafs controlled the play but by no means were they the better team. All this talk about the leafs would win that game 9 times out of ten is silly. All of their goals were on powerplays, some of which were really weak calls.
The way I see it, The Devils controlled the first more, the 2nd was trading chances. Only in the 3rd did the Leafs carry the play more. Which is perfectly understandable since the Devils had the lead and were protecting it. Also they had 2, 2 man advantages against last night. Really I can tell who were the boxscore readers to the people that actually watched the game last night. Had the game been tied in the 3rd. I am sure the Devils would have been more offensive in the 3rd. And the Leafs would have sat back more. Shots on goal are often misleading when you factor in how the context of the game played out as it was last night. In the first 2 periods, the Devils speed forced Leafs D into mistakes. If there is a weakness to expose Toronto, it is their D. Hardly surprising. But we are venturing into GDT analysis here, so I will park this for now!