The defense is 1 piece away from being set.
- Thread starter LEAFANFORLIFE23
- Start date
-
HF Sportsbook has been reset for the new season - Click here to play.
Larcos_Unal
Excuses are for losers
Lots of teams in the same boat. It all comes down to logistics in today's NHL:
- Do we have the cap room?
- Do we have assets to trade for this player?
It would be nice sure but this team is in full on win now mode, and will be for as long as Matthews is on this team.
It's not about development right now.
As for the cap space obviously we don't have it today, but they are going make some moves to clear cap space before the season because they literally have to, and that cap space will grow as the season progresses and by February who knows.
hamzarocks
Registered User
Lets wait and see first how a top 3 of Rielly, Tanev, amd McCabe soes before being so assured that they are good enough to be a cup winning backend
If they perform well, a big move for one of the names you noted makes sense ideally around midway mark of the year
If Tanev shows his age and declines quickly as is possible we need 2 top4 D at which point we need to toss this season and wait until summer when Marner and Tavarea deals expire ajd can assess our team build again.
If they perform well, a big move for one of the names you noted makes sense ideally around midway mark of the year
If Tanev shows his age and declines quickly as is possible we need 2 top4 D at which point we need to toss this season and wait until summer when Marner and Tavarea deals expire ajd can assess our team build again.
There is no tossing this season or any other season that Auston Matthews is on this team.
hamzarocks
Registered User
This season will be a toss if the defense struggles and Tavares doesnt bounce back. The coach and management group may not wish for that, but the quality of the team will sort itself out and result in a quick playoffs exit
Dont have the assets to go out and make a major move
Treliving summer showed he wasnt looking to make a major change tobthe team, and he took gambles on Tanev and OEL being good fits and the missing piece to win
We are banking on Berube to be the answer. This team on paper is not better than 2021-2024 leaf teams, just hoping that his system and coaching is what was missing.
If that isnt the case, it will he the same group of players who have come up short playing R1 vs Bos or FlR most likely.
The actual contention can begin from 2024-2025 if we use the ~22M capspace being freed up to add 3-4 major pieces who outperform their AAVs (our reinhart, verhaghe, montour etc)
Mess
Global Moderator
You're correct Leafs are lacking a true #1 Dman.
However that solution was to either draft one instead of drafting wingers, and when the Leafs signed Tavares it should have resulted in Marner or Nylander being traded for a #1/top pairing Dman.
Instead of signing Tavares the Leafs should have waited and used that $$ on local Ontario born Alex Pietrangelo a UFA, who has now lead 2 teams STL and Vegas to Stanley Cups since Leafs signed Taveras.
However that solution was to either draft one instead of drafting wingers, and when the Leafs signed Tavares it should have resulted in Marner or Nylander being traded for a #1/top pairing Dman.
Instead of signing Tavares the Leafs should have waited and used that $$ on local Ontario born Alex Pietrangelo a UFA, who has now lead 2 teams STL and Vegas to Stanley Cups since Leafs signed Taveras.
Alex Pietrangelo on the Cup winning ST. Louis Blues & Vegas Golden Knights
I don't necessarily agree they don't have the assets, this is the only year they don't have a 1st round pick, every other year from 2026 on they could move their 1st round pick if they want too, and even their 2025 1st round pick could be moved it just means Chicago would be guaranteed the 2026 1st.
If they want to make a big move they could do it.
There is ALWAYS a way.
Moving in the right direction after years of Dubas being tone deaf and tunnel vision, but not there yet.
I would have felt better if we had signed Matt Roy as a UFA instead of Tanev for our 1RHD.
Definitely glad to see Brodie and Giordano gone, and loathed seeing us trot out 5LHD and only 1RHD (Liljegren), having 2 LHD playing their offside was ridiculous.
Much more balanced but we have too many what if’s to feel comfortable.
For our defence to improve, Tanev needs to stay healthy, Liljegren needs to take steps forward under Berube (I think he can), and OEL has to be steady.
We have no idea what we are getting from Hakanpaa, if he can even play, and if he can, at what level. Huge question mark there that could be a great gamble or another Klingberg-esque whiff.
I like the balance the additions bring. I like Tanev but he wasn’t my first choice and if he goes down or starts to decline, we will continue to have a glaring hole at 1RHD, while carrying a 34 year olds $4.5 million contract for 6 years.
At least Holl is gone……
I would have felt better if we had signed Matt Roy as a UFA instead of Tanev for our 1RHD.
Definitely glad to see Brodie and Giordano gone, and loathed seeing us trot out 5LHD and only 1RHD (Liljegren), having 2 LHD playing their offside was ridiculous.
Much more balanced but we have too many what if’s to feel comfortable.
For our defence to improve, Tanev needs to stay healthy, Liljegren needs to take steps forward under Berube (I think he can), and OEL has to be steady.
We have no idea what we are getting from Hakanpaa, if he can even play, and if he can, at what level. Huge question mark there that could be a great gamble or another Klingberg-esque whiff.
I like the balance the additions bring. I like Tanev but he wasn’t my first choice and if he goes down or starts to decline, we will continue to have a glaring hole at 1RHD, while carrying a 34 year olds $4.5 million contract for 6 years.
At least Holl is gone……
- Dec 12, 2017
- 24,931
- 11,632
It might be the best they’ve had on paper at this point of the season in years.
It came out after that Matt Roy was a big target for them, he was the one the got away.
It sounded like it would have been Tanev and Roy and no OEL and if they had pulled that off they'd be set.
Still though I personally like what we've got I just think there is 1 piece missing.
MAJOR step in the right direction though.
I don't think there is any "might" to it.
It is.
- Dec 12, 2017
- 24,931
- 11,632
I’d hate to give up any picks or young assets this year.
Muzzin on paper might have been better than this group.
rumman
Registered User
- Sep 10, 2008
- 16,358
- 12,745
Flip Lilly plus for two years of a retained Fowler and the D is set fir a couple of years, barring injury of course…….
Like I said in the OP Muzzin suffered a career ending injury.
But even if Rielly Brodie Muzzin had stayed together like it was supposed the depth of this group is still better in my opinion.
Because Muzzin started with Holl, and most of us wanted Holl fired into the sun,
Like I said I'd like to see another piece added to really stack but OEL is good enough to be top 4.
Holl never was.
- Dec 12, 2017
- 24,931
- 11,632
Keep him and they’re set, set for what, I don’t know.
If these youngsters, Cowan in particular, are as good as they project, they’ll need to add some speed and skill on the backend. I’m really interested in watching Niemala in the preseason to see how much he’s improved.
They don't need lilly he's not the guy that pulls this defense but he is a guy you might be able to package to get that piece.
- Dec 12, 2017
- 24,931
- 11,632
I’m not opposed to trading him, but he’s cheap, and if he keeps putting on good weight he might turn into their Bogosian, Gouda’s type.
That's what I'm thinking, the plus would have to significant but if you add Fowler to this group You're set.
- Dec 12, 2017
- 24,931
- 11,632
If they can move him for a “real piece”, then yes, which is the case for every player in the organization, But if they’re moving him for another old, slow, about to retire player because of the cap crunch, then it doesn’t matter.
rumman
Registered User
- Sep 10, 2008
- 16,358
- 12,745
Yes the add would have to be a quality piece especially if the Ducks are retaining salary. I hate giving up assets for aging vets, but the window of opportunity seems to make this a no brainer………
rumman
Registered User
- Sep 10, 2008
- 16,358
- 12,745
Imo, Lilly has as much chance of become a Bogosian/Gouda type D man as Freddie the Goat had of becoming a Tom Wilson type forward, neither Freddie or Lilly have had or will ever have a mean streak. I think he’s going to be the softest D man contending for a spot on the team with only Timmins being softer……….
hamzarocks
Registered User
Fowler for Janrkrok + Lilijgren + 2nd + Niemela?
We should not deal our 1st for Fowler so hopefully that offer is enough
Fowler would make me much more confident tbh in this defense group
Rielly - Tanev
Fowler - McCabe
OEL - Benoit
Hakipana
Still wish we had gotten Roy or Pesce instead of Tanev as they will be better moving forward and are younger
Tanev is getting on but he isn't ancient. Gio had his Norris season at 35. Hell, he was one of our best defenders when we got him at 38. Most see a dip around 32 then level off for about 5 years.
Brodie was an anomaly. A lot of off-ice stuff happened to the guy and he didnt really have the hockey IQ to compensate for the lost step. He may even have a bounceback if his new team puts him on his natural side
Injuries are a legitimate concern with Tanev, otherwise he'll be a beauty for us in the short term
Its not your fault
Registered User
- Nov 24, 2016
- 1,864
- 509
Us draft a stud defenseman you'd think by now there would have fall face first into at least a top 2 3. Not drafted in the top 10, Rielly drafted 2 high, and Timmy Lil is just not that yet. Maybe OLE has a similar game and teach him how not to get killed. That said I am all in On Timmy Lil. I do like him. Just reckoned by now we have at least a hit in the 3rd plus rounds or heck even those 2nd rounders would be nice to turn out.
