The bolded is classic overanalysis. Dave Nonis isn't going to be influenced by the board when he makes hockey related decisions. Does he have to answer to the board? Sure, so did Burke, and JFJ and Quinn before him. But this isn't going to be like when JFJ was here and he was denied the request to blow up the team and rebuild.
Nonis did admit that while there is still pressure to make the playoffs, the board at MLSE would not be upset with another non-playoff finish so long as the team is building towards improvement.
He also specifically mentioned that he had absolutely no interest in trading young impact players and prospects for NHL veterans. He said the only way he would entertain trading the young players they have put in place (mentioned Gardiner and Rielly specifically) is if it was in return for other young players.
Also just as a note: Nonis did NOT receive a 3 year contract. He has multiple years (believed to be 3) existing on his current deal as Director of Hockey Ops. They are simply reworking that contract to accomodate the position change.
lol. what are you basing this BS statement on? you think 2/3 of the people on here can't read?[/U][/I][/B]
correct
sadly, at least 2/3 of the people posting here have no idea what that means
lol. what are you basing this BS statement on? you think 2/3 of the people on here can't read?
are you hinting you need it explained?
The bolded is classic overanalysis. Dave Nonis isn't going to be influenced by the board when he makes hockey related decisions. Does he have to answer to the board? Sure, so did Burke, and JFJ and Quinn before him. But this isn't going to be like when JFJ was here and he was denied the request to blow up the team and rebuild.
Nonis did admit that while there is still pressure to make the playoffs, the board at MLSE would not be upset with another non-playoff finish so long as the team is building towards improvement.
He also specifically mentioned that he had absolutely no interest in trading young impact players and prospects for NHL veterans. He said the only way he would entertain trading the young players they have put in place (mentioned Gardiner and Rielly specifically) is if it was in return for other young players.
Also just as a note: Nonis did NOT receive a 3 year contract. He has multiple years (believed to be 3) existing on his current deal as Director of Hockey Ops. They are simply reworking that contract to accomodate the position change.
It's not impossible that he could have learned from his previous experiences and do a better job this time around. Burke has credited Nonis for basically doing the work on the best trades the Leafs have made with the tandem in office. I would hpe that's an indication that Nonis has used his prevoius experience and additional time working behind Burke as a way to better himself in the position and maybe is a bit older and wiser now than before. Only time will tell but I don't think Nonis will have a very long leash with ownership.
I hate to use this as an excuse but Nonis was fairly inexperienced when he took over in Vancouver.
He's had quite a few years to gain additional experience.
Time will tell how better, or worst, he got. Considering the impact he's had on a few trades and signings Burke credited him for, I think it could be a positive move.
The main difference I see is Nonis understands the importance of a top goalie much more than Burke.
Everyone said for years the Canucks were a goalie away from being good in the Cloutier years, but Burke wouldnt get that last piece to put them over the top.
Nonis comes in, trades for Luongo and drafts a top goalie in the first round.
I would expect to see something very similar.
Whether its dealing for Luongo, who knows, maybe a top young goalie like Bernier could be on his radar.
The common knowledge, longstanding, tried and tested successful team building approach of building from the goalie out, through strong defense and strength down the middle through your centers is as old as time itself, and what I expect from Nonis.
Inexplicably and incomprehensibly (as to what he could possibly have been thinking) our former experienced GMthought successful team building was accomplished by building from the Wings In (Kessel, JVR, Lupul, MacArthur) with weak centers, shaky defense and soft goaltending as his path taken, with a soft, small, easily intimidated team to boot.. All of which rightfully produced expected disastrous, bottom of the league standing end results for a very poor ill-conceived plan, you might expect from a greenhorn GM but not a experienced one.
Not only was the plan backasswards in approach to the norm, but the saddest part was that the best assets of top picks and prospects where used to go down this fatal road, leaving us where we are today settled near the bottom of the NHL.
Yesterday the TSN panel (MacKenzie or Dreger) confirmed that Nonis didn't support Burke fully on the Kessel trade, and wanted to take the slower patient approach at the time it occurred. So Nonis hopefully focuses his attention where its needed in #1 G and #1 C and building up the defense to provide a more successful on ice winning product.
go look at the Ballard years. even worse for coaches back then
Kyper says he believes Dave Nonis is MLSE whipping boy.
Kyper hasn't gotten anything right since he was Ryan Vandenbussche's whipping boy.
Ya but Kyper says a lot of things, mostly his opinions and not based on fact.
Unless Leafs significantly improve by end of July (in standings and roster), Nonis can join Burke for all I care.
Enough of mediocracy, and Nonis has been part of the failing front office. So, as I said earlier, clock doesn't reset on him.
I'm happy to hear that he's not willing to trade young players unless it's for another young player of value to the team. I guess I can rest easy that if Luongo is coming, Gardiner isn't going the other way. I don't think Luongo is coming though.
Seems like he has the same philosophies as Burke but the difference is obviously in the style in which they'll go about trying to get the job done. If there's one thing we know from Nonis' resume is that he's a patient guy. He's acknowledged that there are building blocks in place so he's going to have to get creative to find ways to address the team needs without blowing up everything and starting from scratch. At this point, I don't think either side wants to do that.
vaive is out of control
What resume are you looking at? Talk to Vancouver fans. I lived through 3 years of Nonis....he was not patient. He made really bad trades and FA signings and missed the playoffs with Lu/Twins/Naslund et al. When he did make the playoffs...the team was hanging on by a thread.... What Nonis are you talking about?
Until the Luongo trade goes through..and you realize Nonis is just a puppet to the BOG.... Nonis is the classic "fall" guy....
What resume are you looking at? Talk to Vancouver fans. I lived through 3 years of Nonis....he was not patient. He made really bad trades and FA signings and missed the playoffs with Lu/Twins/Naslund et al. When he did make the playoffs...the team was hanging on by a thread.... What Nonis are you talking about?
It will be exactly the same with less bluster.
Wouldn't be surprised if he's removed by the end of the Year. Gretzky is brought in as the next GM.