SensFactor
Registered User
Boston should have never let Ullamark go without signing Swayman...he has them by the hair now.
Speculation: The Bruins and Jeremy Swayman are far apart in contract term (length) and dollar amount.
- Thread starter HockeyVirus
- Start date
How to date yourself as a hockey fan...
Jump to page 38 about a debate about Swayman and his contract talks with Boston. See the name Dipietro and automatically jump to the conclusion a poster trying to point out the risk of signing a younger goalie to long term big money (before reading the entire post).
Ummm nope, different Dipietro... I'm not the only one who had this though process, right, RIGHT?!?
Gaylord Q Tinkledink
Registered User
- Apr 29, 2018
- 31,739
- 34,908
Putting your faith into a young Bussi is better than putting it in any (Sway)man
just wanted to make a cheesey pun
just wanted to make a cheesey pun
I don't really see the danger here, does anyone say "he's not an NHL goalie" no, he's at worst, an average goalie. He isn't 28/29 or anything.
So he underperforms and you trade him in 2-4 years with a small bit of retention, or not. (cap will also be up by that time)
starter number 1 quality goalies are at a premium, and we haven't seen much in the pipelines anywhere. So I dont' get it.
8X8 Seems like a no brainer. NMC ONLY or 20 team NTC for 2-3 years if that's what he's asking.
Seems like next no risk here, aside from cap considerations.
So he underperforms and you trade him in 2-4 years with a small bit of retention, or not. (cap will also be up by that time)
starter number 1 quality goalies are at a premium, and we haven't seen much in the pipelines anywhere. So I dont' get it.
8X8 Seems like a no brainer. NMC ONLY or 20 team NTC for 2-3 years if that's what he's asking.
Seems like next no risk here, aside from cap considerations.
