guymez
The Seldom Seen Kid
- Mar 3, 2004
- 33,916
- 14,131
I think for me I have trouble figuring out exactly what Nurse is in terms of a ranking.Ekholm is steadier than Nurse. Also, a more mature Bouchard is better than any D partner Nurse has had...ever perhaps?
Also, we all know that Nurse isn't worth his salary. That's just beating a dead horse at this point, nobody is even arguing this.
I'm just disputing the claims that he's not a top pairing Dman and giving reasons why I think he makes mistakes as often as he does.
On the other hand, I feel he's undervalued around here for two reasons, because folks attach him to $9.25m and hold him to that standard and nothing less and because, two, the focus is much more on his mistakes as opposed to what he does well.
Perfect example.... Hardly a word muttered about him after the first 3 games outside of the one critical mistake he made in OT when he played very well for the majority of those games yet he's all over the headline when he made some mistakes in the 1st period in particular yesterday.
Thats why I posted the question about carrying lesser dmen.
I mean I would be comfortable putting virtually any dman on the team beside Ekholm and I am absolutely not comfortable doing that with Nurse.
Nurse simply doesnt own a refined enough game for him to be able to take that on and be successful. Thats been proven time and time again over the last few years.
So IMO that suggests that he definitely isnt a #1 dman because that is a quality that a #1 dman has.
I think that Nurse is a #2/#3 dman. No shame in that except that he is grossly overpaid for that role.
The only reason IMO why Nurse got the contract he did was because the team simply didnt have another dman that was better. Nurse was the best dman on the team.
That more than anything was an indictment on the quality of the defence.
As the team moves forward (and improves the defence) its going to be harder to justify Nurse and his contract.