Do you think that his defensive improvements are coming at the cost of his offensive production or is his lack of point production this year for other reasons?
Zegras - Frost - Brink
This would be the best press box line in Torts history
His offensive production is being blown out of proportion tbh but people that want zegras to fail... and people that prob havnt sat down and watched a ducks game all year(and trust me as a ducks fan i know its incredibly hard to watch anaheim play hockey the last few seasons). Hes still that same player that will attack dmen 1 on 1, pull off a flashy move, make a pass his teammates would never expect.Do you think that his defensive improvements are coming at the cost of his od him and we simply havnt had amuch offensive production or is his lack of point production this year for other reasons?
No one that says that actually has a good reason to say it other than they dont like zegras.Why does it seem that? They benched him for the defensive end of things from what I understood. I’ve never heard the team say or do anything that says they thinks he’s selfish either to be honest. Why do you think they agree with you?
Trading Zegras makes zero sense.
Verbeek traded Drysdale to fill the lack of forward depth the team had. To then go and trade one of your best young forwards would be down right dumb.
No, I said 'anyone' could be available for a price. And the price for PV to go help Leo pack up his apartment would have to be absolutely insane ... such as Bedard and this year's first.Wait, hold on… are you suggesting that Chicago would have to add a first with Bedard to get Carlsson?
I appreciate the rundown. If they're set with a top pairing then I see why Byram could be expendable. I just don't see Zegras being the kind of 2C you want come playoff time. I don't think the offense is plentiful enough for how one dimensional he is.I wouldn't say "fallen off" -- but his health is a concern; he's never going to get an opportunity to be 'the guy' on defense in Colorado with Makar and Toews clearly ahead of him; he has yet to settle into being the steady high end second pairing defender the Avs want him to be (and I'm not sure he wants to be that guy, it's not his playstyle -- he really wants to be far more of a rover); and the Avs desperately need a quality #2 center (and ideally one who is a 2+year solution) since Ryan Johansen is utterly useless. I'd happily move Byram and more for the right #2 center -- and Zegras would pretty much be perfect.
I think you're underselling Zegras quite a bit...
I'm not even a huge Zegras fan by any means but he's produced 60+ points on some awful Anaheim teams, and this year was making legitimate strides in his defensive game before the injuries hit.
He's easily still got 70-80 point upside. Especially on the Avs where he may get to spend time on the Top PP with Mackinnon/Makar or might get a winger like Rantanen or Nichushkin or even Landeskog playing with him.
Byram has regressed, but I don't think offering him up in a Zegras deal is an indication of that regression by any means.
If anything I would say Byram+ for Zegras would be very similar to the Drysdale+ for Gauthier deal we just saw except involving two more NHL established players essentially.
It could also have something to do with exactly what was said in the OP as well. He doesn’t seem to fit the team they’re trying to build and he’s having a brutal yearAll these overwhelming "The Ducks are going to trade Zegras" rumors seemed to start right with the Drysdale trade.
Apparently the "logic" of them is that both Drysdale & Zegras held out on contract negotiations during training camp. "Drysdale got traded therefore it's only logical that Zegras must be gone too..."
That's it, I've seen no other reason for them other than people making silly predictions to bring eyeballs to whatever hack column they wrote.
Could they trade him? Sure, pretty much anyone can be had for a price. If Chicago offered Bedard and their 1st this year for Carlsson, I'm sure PV would swing by Leo's apartment and help him pack. But unless it's one hell of a return, Zegras isn't going anywhere.
He’s a Kings fan. He’s allowing his Ducks hatred to cloud his judgment of a player who obviously has tremendous skill and has very good upside.I think you're underselling Zegras quite a bit...
I'm not even a huge Zegras fan by any means but he's produced 60+ points on some awful Anaheim teams, and this year was making legitimate strides in his defensive game before the injuries hit.
He's easily still got 70-80 point upside. Especially on the Avs where he may get to spend time on the Top PP with Mackinnon/Makar or might get a winger like Rantanen or Nichushkin or even Landeskog playing with him.
Byram has regressed, but I don't think offering him up in a Zegras deal is an indication of that regression by any means.
If anything I would say Byram+ for Zegras would be very similar to the Drysdale+ for Gauthier deal we just saw except involving two more NHL established players essentially.
You could just say “I hate zegras” and saved yourself the time typingI appreciate the rundown. If they're set with a top pairing then I see why Byram could be expendable. I just don't see Zegras being the kind of 2C you want come playoff time. I don't think the offense is plentiful enough for how one dimensional he is.
I look at it as only 60 points... he's had every opportunity to succeed and that's the best he's got? I can't see him improving much on that in a lesser role on a better team. Look at someone like Karlsson on the Sharks.
The Avs could be a decent fit because of the strength on the wings and he'd obviously not be expected to be a 1C there. But I look at Byram as still a potential top pairing D, while Zegras looks like he could top out as a 70ish point one dimensional forward. I'm taking the d man every single time there.
60 points also ain't what it once was. Look at some of the guys clearing a point per game these last few years. Suddenly a offense first forward doesn't look so hot if that's the best he can do
Nah man. 60+ points in both of your first two seasons is not good if you’re one dimensional. And he has no room for improvement, apparently.You could just say “I hate zegras” and saved yourself the time typing
I love Zegras and think he’s given a bad rap for being flashy. However, I’d also be ok with him being traded after his holdout, if he was against signing long term. (Assuming it’s a good return, of course)As a Ducks fan, I’d be more than OK trading Zegras. He is not what a winning team is built around. He will be a complimentary winger but he will never be a difference maker
Smoke and farts are not the same thing.Ducks fans swear he's not getting dealt , i tend to believe them but why is there so much smoke
Depending where we draft I think that is 1 way I could see him being movedCould see Montreal trade the 1st this year for him tbh
Yeah, I think the way our GM builds he’d be up for it especially if it’s a pick around 8-12Depending where we draft I think that is 1 way I could see him being moved
My opinion:Can a Ducks fan explain to me why it took until October for Zegras to sign only a 3-year extension when Anaheim had brink trucks of money ready to offload in their young elite "immovable" asset?
That alone was all I needed to see that he doesn't want to be on that team for longer than he has to be. What don't people understand? The rift between Zegras/Verbeek already was opened and where there is smoke there's fire. You think a guy like Pat Verbeek has any sort of respect for Trevor's overall game? I see what he's building in Anaheim and trust me, it doesn't include a mosquito player like Zegras. This isn't Jack Hughes we're talking about. They're going to be a monster team come playoff time once they add another big rig winger.